Mask Mandate Doesn't Translate To Wearing Masks While Driving

[Into the Night]

Another "constitutionalist" teabagger, Trump U. grad?

That is their primary function, RETARD.

WRONG. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States. The Supreme Court has NO authority over the Constitution. They can neither change nor interpret it.

Only the States have that authority. The States create and empower the Constitution. They are the owners. Only they can change it, interpret it, or even choose to destroy it and thus dissolve the federal government.
It is the same kind of thing with each State constitution. The people of that State own a State constitution. They are the only ones that can change it, interpret it, or even choose to destroy it and thus dissolve their State government.

No court has any authority over a State constitution either.

 

[Into the Night]

Why do you care? Maybe, people want to wait to wash their hands before they remove the mask. Maybe, they don’t mind wearing the mask, it makes them feel secure. It’s silly to comment on this.

Because such hypochondria is unnecessary. Masks do not stop a virus.

 

[Into the Night]

no, it's not, biden blower. the founders would have been pretty god damned stupid to create a LIMITED government and then give them power over defining their limitations.

how do you stupid fucking people survive on a daily basis with zero critical thinking skills?

Google.

 

[Into the Night]

You bet I’m a sheep and proud of it. I will comply with the mask mandates because I care. It’s the least we can do to alleviate this pandemic. So call me whatever name you wish. I want to rid the planet of CoVID. Baaaaaaaaa, now where’s Mott?

You cannot rid the planet of covid19.

 

[Into the Night]

how does wearing your mask alone in the care show you care?

It doesn't. It's sheer hypochondria.

the more these disposable one time use masks that you are wearing every day, when you don't need to, the less efficacious they become.

Masks can and do harbor bacteria.

How is you wearing a mask alone in your car ridding the planet of covid?

It doesn't, obviously.

Interesting peer reviewed study for your consideration.

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/exten...acepiece-respirators-a-rapid-evidence-review/

This is not a study, but it is a reiteration of surgical mask extended use and reuse guidelines as published by various organizations such as the CDC and WHO. Yes, this applies to any N95 mask. No N95 mask is effective against a virus. No cloth mask is either.

Masks can and do harbor bacteria.

 

[Into the Night]

I wear my mask till I can remove it safely, but then, again, I rarely go out.

So you are agoraphobic as well?

 

[Into the Night]

That’s great to know I bet! It’s very encouraging that you still have antibodies.

What do you care? You are still terrified to go out, and terrified that you will catch The Covid Plague and somehow a magick mask will protect you.

 

[Into the Night]

Holy fuck, Dotard really must love you, mind numbingly STUPID.

Insult fallacies.

The courts define government limitations,

No. Constitutions define government limitations, including the limitations and authorities of any court system. The purpose of a constitution is to declare and define a government and give it certain powers. It has NO powers outside what that constitution specifically gives it. The only way that constitution can be changed is specified in that constitution, or it can be utterly destroyed by those that created it. The States create and ordain the Constitution of the United States. Only the States can change it, interpret it, or destroy it.

that's why they have filings, hearings and trials,

A filing is submitting paperwork to a court. It does not define anything in a constitution.
A hearing or a trial is a court listening to a case that has been filed. It does not define anything in a constitution.

some times the government (prosecution) LOSES because they went BEYOND their limitations according to laws on the books at the time, in the US, the states, the counties at the time.

Some times they do. Courts DO have authority to nullify laws passed by a government. They do NOT have authority to interpret or change any constitution.

Wish stupidity was painful, teabaggers would be ICU's all over the country.
The worst pandemic in the country, TEABAGGERS.

More insult fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

it is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would create a LIMITED government, then hand the power to define those limits to that government. stop being a moron and defining adjudication with defining limits. it makes you look like a supreme retard

He is trying to make the Supreme Court an oligarchy and destroy the Constitution.

 

[no worries]

Insult fallacies.

No. Constitutions define government limitations, including the limitations and authorities of any court system. The purpose of a constitution is to declare and define a government and give it certain powers. It has NO powers outside what that constitution specifically gives it. The only way that constitution can be changed is specified in that constitution, or it can be utterly destroyed by those that created it. The States create and ordain the Constitution of the United States. Only the States can change it, interpret it, or destroy it.

A filing is submitting paperwork to a court. It does not define anything in a constitution.
A hearing or a trial is a court listening to a case that has been filed. It does not define anything in a constitution.

Some times they do. Courts DO have authority to nullify laws passed by a government. They do NOT have authority to interpret or change any constitution.

More insult fallacies.

it is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the framers would create a LIMITED government, then hand the power to define those limits to that government. stop being a moron and defining adjudication with defining limits. it makes you look like a supreme retard

The height of stupidity lies with the Trump U. "law" school correspondence course "gradiates".

That's the exact purpose of the courts, supreme retard.

 

[no worries]

Insult fallacies.

No. Constitutions define government limitations, including the limitations and authorities of any court system. The purpose of a constitution is to declare and define a government and give it certain powers. It has NO powers outside what that constitution specifically gives it. The only way that constitution can be changed is specified in that constitution, or it can be utterly destroyed by those that created it. The States create and ordain the Constitution of the United States. Only the States can change it, interpret it, or destroy it.

A filing is submitting paperwork to a court. It does not define anything in a constitution.
A hearing or a trial is a court listening to a case that has been filed. It does not define anything in a constitution.

Some times they do. Courts DO have authority to nullify laws passed by a government. They do NOT have authority to interpret or change any constitution.

More insult fallacies.

Yes they do.

The federal government has NO authority to create the EPA, the NEA, the Federal Reserve, the BATF, airport screening, or portions of the FAA and the FCC. NOTHING in the Constitution authorizes those actions. The federal government can legally only perform those actions specifically authorized by the Constitution of the United States. Nothing else.

Who does, "genius"? Walmart?

Mind numbingly STUPID.

 

[no worries]

Insult fallacies.

No. Constitutions define government limitations, including the limitations and authorities of any court system. The purpose of a constitution is to declare and define a government and give it certain powers. It has NO powers outside what that constitution specifically gives it. The only way that constitution can be changed is specified in that constitution, or it can be utterly destroyed by those that created it. The States create and ordain the Constitution of the United States. Only the States can change it, interpret it, or destroy it.

A filing is submitting paperwork to a court. It does not define anything in a constitution.
A hearing or a trial is a court listening to a case that has been filed. It does not define anything in a constitution.

Some times they do. Courts DO have authority to nullify laws passed by a government. They do NOT have authority to interpret or change any constitution.

More insult fallacies.

I'm not giving a retard another grade school civics lesson.

You MUST belong to Q annon, no one gets that stupid on their own.

 

[no worries]

He is trying to make the Supreme Court an oligarchy and destroy the Constitution.

Teabaggers are trying to make their communist, dear leader's regime, into an oligarchy and destroy the constitution and America.

 

[AProudLefty]

Yea, along with the rim polishers, and sleazy three-pack-a-day waitresses in the choke and puke restaurant...

"Rim polishers". Why did I think of something nasty?

 

[AProudLefty]

So you are agoraphobic as well?

Monk, his brother, me and others don't like crowded places.

Ever been to malls during Christmas shopping the past few years? Yeah.

 

[Peace n Safety]

"Rim polishers". Why did I think of something nasty?

Because you’re out of fellowship with God


Blessings

 

[AProudLefty]

Because you’re out of fellowship with God


Blessings

Nope I wasn't. God has a sense of humor. Not many people know that.

Bless your heart, my child.

 

[Peace n Safety]

Nope I wasn't. God has a sense of humor. Not many people know that.

Bless your heart, my child.

Fornicatin is a sin


Blessings

 

[AProudLefty]

Fornicatin is a sin


Blessings

Ever heard of a lady named Lilith?

 

[Peace n Safety]

Ever heard of a lady named Lilith?

Unfortunately yes. A lie.


Blessings