BartenderElite
Verified User
"Earl" is one person, Barfly. Generalize much?
I see no anger.
- Diogenes
- Replies: 35
- Forum: Current Events Forum
"Earl" is one person, Barfly. Generalize much?
I see no anger.
You finally get it.
The wealthy would pay more than the poor and the poor, who pay nothing now, would pay something.
It’s only fair.
Why should anyone get a free ride, except the mentally and physically impaired?
![]()
I see no anger.
- Diogenes
- Replies: 35
- Forum: Current Events Forum
If he is kicking out 5 K checks, can you imagine how much he is making through his coup? The dereg is because it helps him and his businesses.
No, the poor would finally pay their fair share.And the poor would pay more than they do right now.
You finally get it. We'd be shifting more of the tax burden to the poor under your proposed tax. Period.
So, shifting more of the tax burden to the poor - who are already falling way behind every day because their income can't keep up w/ the cost of living, while the top 1% prosper. Good luck w/ that.
No, the poor would finally pay their fair share.
They pay no federal income tax now.
That is not fair.
How can there be loopholes if everyone pays the exact same consumptive tax rate?What's the "no" for?
You proved what I was trying to say. You want to shift more of the tax burden to the poor.
I'm sure that will go over well w/ millions, while the wealthy in America get more wealthy and find more loopholes.
That is demonstrably wrong.It's almost impossible to get ahead if you're poor in America.
The idea of the working poor keeping even LESS of their income is mind-boggling in its insensitivity.
That is demonstrably wrong.
Tens of millions have risen from poverty to the middle class and then wealthy class in America.
It’s called the American dream.
You need to comprehend what you read. My point wasn't that folks in this thread weren't saying that, it was that it was not a "MAGA" thing.LOL
Maybe read the discussion next time, Damo.
Earl is literally saying that the poor need to pay more than they do now.
Pretty sure they already pay consumption taxes. But federal income tax? Not so much.
Can you think of a better way to convince more Americans that we need a smaller bureaucracy and less government spending?
No, since they enjoy the benefits of living in America, they must pay their fair share.I said "almost."
And you want to make it harder, for those who have the hardest time getting there.
You need to comprehend what you read. My point wasn't that folks in this thread weren't saying that, it was that it was not a "MAGA" thing.
Where on Trump's platform or during either of his campaigns did you ever hear of him suggesting a National Sales Tax?
I wonder if Americans would pay $5,000 to be more safe w/ their food, medicine, transportation, nuclear stockpile & national defense.