National divorce would be devastating for red states

QP! said:
Floor steps and shifts the pot to me, as even Maxime Waters does not have the history of abjectly stupid quotes MTG does, and i am happy to bet you on that in a quote for quote challenge. Despite MW having a much longer public career, MJT will already trounce her.

That is why you would never take the bet, as you know you would lose.
Click to expand...

here are your first ten.....get busy......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no one out-"shitholes" California.....
Click to expand...

Except Red States.

And if that is the case, and you believe it, you should argue for California to get to keep all the money they send out to Red State shitholes, so they can spend it on themselves.

Put it this way. If you look at your typical shithole Red voting family and they were forced to pay out more, to their neighbours who were also shitholes but Blue voting, it would make no sense to ask the Blue voting family to keep paying out more, and giving that welfare to the Red voting family. Why take the money from the worse (as you say) Blue Family/State to give to the less worse Red family/State?


And yet they do? Why? Because by your logic, even when Red State are better they cannot stuck sucking on the Welfare teet.

Red States are a scourge on America by your own admission as you say 'even when they are better they still want Welfare'.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....Maxine has no history of non-stupid quotes......
Click to expand...

Easy bet for you then but you won't take it as you know you will lose.

Avatar bet. 3 months. I have to post 2 stupid statements by MTG for everyone you have to post by Maxine. Maxine has been in politics and on the air way longer and yet you still will not take that bet.

I offer the same bet re Trumps idiocy and dementia statements versus Biden and not one rightie will ever take it as they know. They shit talk but they know the truth.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you are a fucking joke.....you know the majority of welfare recipients live in blue cities but you are too dishonest to admit it......
Click to expand...

In 'blue cities in Red States that ultimately control the budgets'. You are too dishonest to admit that.

You see the Governor and State funneling money meant for the poor to Brett Favre and the rich and then you say 'but those blue cities in Red States are the problem'. Well d'uh. Yes Red State Governors deliberately take all the Federal money given to them to help uplift the poor (for education, etc) and they gift it as welfare to the rich. You then blame the poor for that and will not admit as you are to dishonest to because you are fucking joke.
 
QP! said:
then the Shit hole Red States should let California keep most of its money and say they no longer want California subsidizing them.
Click to expand...

The red states have been trying to cut those income transfer programs for year but are told it helps the poor. Then, those who support those programs complain when those funds go to the poor in red states.

Most of those red states are relatively small compared to the much large populations getting benefits in blue states such as CA, NY, IL, PA, NJ... A lot more money goes to those blue states but they also pay higher taxes.
 
Flash said:
The red states have been trying to cut those income transfer programs for year but are told it helps the poor. Then, those who support those programs complain when those funds go to the poor in red states.

Most of those red states are relatively small compared to the much large populations getting benefits in blue states such as CA, NY, IL, PA, NJ... A lot more money goes to those blue states but they also pay higher taxes.
Click to expand...

what you do not recognize is that the money going to Blue States comes from Blue States.

So for example if California gives $1 to the Feds, they get back less than $1 from the Feds in total, and thus have to fund the social programs from their own State tax payer money. Whereas if a Red State gives the Feds $1, they then get back more than $1 to fund social programs and other. Thus State taxpayers are being subsidized by taxpayers in Cali and other Blue States, when they instead give that welfare money to rich guys like Brett Favre.
 
QP! said:
Except Red States.

And if that is the case, and you believe it, you should argue for California to get to keep all the money they send out to Red State shitholes, so they can spend it on themselves.

Put it this way. If you look at your typical shithole Red voting family and they were forced to pay out more, to their neighbours who were also shitholes but Blue voting, it would make no sense to ask the Blue voting family to keep paying out more, and giving that welfare to the Red voting family. Why take the money from the worse (as you say) Blue Family/State to give to the less worse Red family/State?


And yet they do? Why? Because by your logic, even when Red State are better they cannot stuck sucking on the Welfare teet.

Red States are a scourge on America by your own admission as you say 'even when they are better they still want Welfare'.
Click to expand...

you are not an honest poster.....we all know California has both a large population and the highest poverty rate.....there is no way they don't have the most on welfare.......
 
QP! said:
Easy bet for you then but you won't take it as you know you will lose.

Avatar bet. 3 months. I have to post 2 stupid statements by MTG for everyone you have to post by Maxine. Maxine has been in politics and on the air way longer and yet you still will not take that bet.

I offer the same bet re Trumps idiocy and dementia statements versus Biden and not one rightie will ever take it as they know. They shit talk but they know the truth.
Click to expand...

silly cunt.....fuck the bet.....produce or be a cunt......your fucking choice...../
 
QP! said:
Get busy???

First hit in google search is top 10. That sits on top of the bottom 500.

Marjorie Taylor Greene's 10 Most Outrageous Quotes This Year
Click to expand...

what's outrageous about asking if Harris's husband is worth less because he's white........she's correcting demmycunt assumptions......should I waste my time correcting your other errors?.....

if so she was correct about the way lib'ruls treat our military.....more?....
 
Addressing a rally in Sioux City, Iowa, she said: "The only border that [Democrats] care about is Ukraine, not America's southern border. Under Republicans, not another penny will go to Ukraine, our country comes first. They [Democrats] don't care about our border or our people."
Click to expand...

its true the Demmycrats don't give a fuck about our southern border isn't it?.....
 
SmarterthanYou said:
If she were the sole individual talking about this, you would have a solid point. the problem is that there are many talking about this, so it merits serious discussion.
Click to expand...

There are? Sorry but most of America does not read and listen to far rightys who want to destroy America. I do not hear people talking insurrection, but I do not follow Breitbart, Qanon and Fox Gnus.
 
Nordberg said:
There are? Sorry but most of America does not read and listen to far rightys who want to destroy America. I do not hear people talking insurrection, but I do not follow Breitbart, Qanon and Fox Gnus.
Click to expand...

I've been a registered Democrat since 1967, the year that I turned 21 [that was the voting age then].
I've voted straight blue tickets on every general election ballot since then.

I am anything but a "far righty."

I think a negotiated partition of the republic is definitely an idea worth exploring.

People who share NO common values shouldn't be writing each other's laws and tax codes.
 
floridafan said:
A so-called "national divorce" would work out poorly for red states, which a new analysis shows depend heavily on blue states.

MSNBC economic analyst Steve Rattner presented data on "Morning Joe" showing that states won by Donald Trump contribute far less to the federal budget than states won by President Biden, which Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and some other Republicans said should be separated from one another.

"The Trump states, virtually every single state except for Utah, don't ask me why Utah, got back more from Washington than it paid," Rattner said. "So it would not really work very well to their advantage to leave. In fact, the top states for getting a better deal from Washington are Kentucky, Mississippi and West Virginia."

Higher state-level poverty rates correlate with support for Republican candidates, Rattner said, while Democratic-leaning states tend to have higher income.

"You can see with your eye that the red states tend to be above the national average in poverty," Rattner said, while presenting a chart showing that correlation. "The blue states tend to be below the national average in poverty. Another way to look at it is if -- this is by counties but you get to the same place, on the right, how much of the [gross domestic product] is produced in these places -- red counties, 29 percent, blue counties, 71 percent. They're suffering more economically, and that does lead to the question of, how does that result in more money going to these states?"
https://www.rawstory.com/national-divorce/
Click to expand...

Blue states would starve within 6 mos, retard.
 
QP! said:
Except Red States.

And if that is the case, and you believe it, you should argue for California to get to keep all the money they send out to Red State shitholes, so they can spend it on themselves.

Put it this way. If you look at your typical shithole Red voting family and they were forced to pay out more, to their neighbours who were also shitholes but Blue voting, it would make no sense to ask the Blue voting family to keep paying out more, and giving that welfare to the Red voting family. Why take the money from the worse (as you say) Blue Family/State to give to the less worse Red family/State?


And yet they do? Why? Because by your logic, even when Red State are better they cannot stuck sucking on the Welfare teet.

Red States are a scourge on America by your own admission as you say 'even when they are better they still want Welfare'.
Click to expand...

Oh look! A new commie shill, yay!

Said no one ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top