Noncooperation With Congress? Yeah, Nixon Tried That. Didn't Work For Him Either.

Adolf_Twitler said:
i-am-not-30eacc02fa.jpg


i-am-a-1faebb0a0c.jpg
Click to expand...

You guys still can’t get over Nixon. Still trying to run that playbook

Romney ain’t no Goldwater

And


Trump ain’t no Nixon

You aren’t going to get Trump to resign. There will have to be a vote. Only Nancy can start this.
 
Teflon Don said:
You guys still can’t get over Nixon. Still trying to run that playbook

Romney ain’t no Goldwater

And


Trump ain’t no Nixon

You aren’t going to get Trump to resign. There will have to be a vote. Only Nancy can start this.
Click to expand...

Trump's crimes make Nixon look like he got caught Farting In Church or something by comparison.

No Trump will not resign, and I doubt Mitch will remove Donald from office.

But, let me ask you- What would Trump have to do for you to want to see him removed from office?
 
What's so wrong with Pence or Romney? You don't think they would be good presidents?

Additional question for you Don!
 
Last edited:
Adolf_Twitler said:
Trump's crimes make Nixon look like he got caught Farting In Church or something by comparison.

No Trump will not resign, and I doubt Mitch will remove Donald from office.

But, let me ask you- What would Trump have to do for you to want to see him removed from office?
Click to expand...

Agree with liberal/progressive scumbags like you.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Trump's crimes make Nixon look like he got caught Farting In Church or something by comparison.

No Trump will not resign, and I doubt Mitch will remove Donald from office.

But, let me ask you- What would Trump have to do for you to want to see him removed from office?
Click to expand...

I'd want him to be removed if he stopped winning......
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Trump's crimes make Nixon look like he got caught Farting In Church or something by comparison.

No Trump will not resign, and I doubt Mitch will remove Donald from office.

But, let me ask you- What would Trump have to do for you to want to see him removed from office?
Click to expand...

Agree with the left on anything
 
Teflon Don said:
Did you vote for Romney in 2012?

If not, what's so wrong with him?
Click to expand...

NO! But my decision was not based on party or policy, it was based on who I thought was most likely to win. And I'm not going to lie, I WAS STILL DAMN MAD At Bush and the Republicans economy, which led to a career ending lay-off for me, losing about 300K of my 401K- JUST WHEN I NEEDED IT MOST.

But, Romney I believe was a great Republican choice, and I certainly didn't have anything against him personally. I think he is a great leader and glad to see him in Washington now.
 
PoliTalker said:
The power of impeachment lies with the House.

It is not up to the executive to decide how impeachment is supposed to go.

The power lies with the House. That's in the Constitution. The House has no Rules requiring a floor vote.

And there is no court to go to about this. (Trump's favorite recourse to get his way.)

Nixon tried not cooperating with the House. Nixon also had articles against him for obstructing the Impeachment Inquiry, in addition to Watergate.

Trump is going to have articles against him for obstructing the House Impeachment Inquiry, in addition to Abuse of office and Violation of Oath of office, over the Ukraine Affair.

Keep it up, Mr. President. You're just digging yourself in deeper.
Click to expand...

Yeah.....there was an actual "IMPEACHMENT" hearing with actual Subpoenas. Nothing like the left wing circle jerk going on now with Shitforbrains being the pivot man. This (wink, wink) INQUIRY has no authority to issue subpoenas...they are issuing threatening letters without the power of legal penalty. Its a most difficult thing to impeach someone when you can't even get make witnesses show up or you do not have enough house support to hold an actual up/down vote with the judicial committee literally being BENCHED on the sidelines. :laugh:


Reality: during the Nixon hearings....it was Nixon hiding in the shadows attempting to avoid due process......NOT CONGRESS. :bigthink:
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
LOL! You know bias and political hatred gets no one anywhere! Sometimes like the one we are in today, is a time when we must all put our love of country and the Constitution above PARTY politics.
Click to expand...

I agree with the last statement that is why I oppose EVERYTHING the left stands for and will never compromise with them. I want them defeated
 
PoliTalker said:
The power of impeachment lies with the House.

It is not up to the executive to decide how impeachment is supposed to go.

The power lies with the House. That's in the Constitution. The House has no Rules requiring a floor vote.
Click to expand...

Any appearance of fairness toward the Executive should in the very least afford the President a full vote of the House before convening an impeachment inquiry in my opinion. But then of course I’d never expect Nancy Pelosi or any democrat politician for that matter to have a dime’s worth of respect for the Presidency or any example of fairness for an opposition President.

Not only is Pelosi & her democrat henchmen willfully ignorant about any appearance of fairness, but transparency in their kangaroo court is being hidden behind closed hearing doors so that only any tidbits supporting impeachment get leaked to their major media propaganda machine CNN while any exculpatory testimony can only be noticed by the Republican leaks to Fox. Honest folk would prefer open public hearings & the antiseptic of sun light. But what the hell why be fair, honest and non-partisan when you can get away being a typical lo-life scumbag? To hell with America’s public citizens, those ass-holes ain’t paying attention anyhow And like Hitler once noted, “the people ain’t smart enough to know who their leaders should be.”

Then we have old Bug Eyes Adam Schiff, Kangaroo Court Committee Chairman leading the charge. Madam Nancy couldn’t have picked a better hyper partisan serial liar and crooked bastard to lead the mob. Ole Adam is still waiting on those Russian impersonators to deliver up those naked Trump pictures he fell for.

But never fear folks! Every intelligent folk in America who’s paying any attention to this sham knows just by watching the democrat’s Kabuki theater operation that Madam Nancy won’t call for a full house vote because she doesn’t have the votes, and or she wants to protect those moderate democrats that got elected in those precincts that Trump won in 16. Voting for an impeachment inquiry could get them defeated in 20. We’re also very well aware that Bug Eyes Schiff’s hearings are all secret because to allow them to be public, would reveal to honest folk the sham that’s taking place & like always the neo-commie democrats have squat for evidence to impeach this President, & every day it’s becoming more & more apparent that the lynch mob of democrat candidates for the Presidency couldn’t get elected dogcatcher in any honest & informed country.
 
PS. Oh yeah, if Madam Nancy actually did call for a full House vote, then the Republicans could have the right to subpoena their own witnesses, like Hunter Biden & old sleepy Joe himself. Nancy can't have that now can she?
 
PoliTalker said:
Noncooperation With Congress? Yeah, Nixon Tried That. Didn't Work For Him Either.
Click to expand...

This isn't Watergate. This is nothing like Watergate. People who think it is don't have their facts. Trump has no reason to allow a radical leftist Democratic Party of the Jackass cabal to interfere with his job.

Until the Party of the Jackass can prove that Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, and conduct a floor vote in the House with articles of impeachment, Trump doesn't have to do a damned thing.

The Party of the Jackass are the one's out of control, not this President. ;)
 
Gonzomin said:
What Trump is doing is called obstruction. Mueller showed another 10 incidents of obstruction.
Click to expand...

Obstruction of what? I have read the Mueller report, nothing in that report would be considered evidence of obstruction. In fact, it would be laughed out of a court of law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top