Pakistan

Hitler and German aggression ..

Attacks on England andf other allied partners ..

Threats to legitimate US commerce ..

"Why" seems self-explanatory

So you think the US entered the war because of the blitz? Because of the attacks on shipping?

Why doesn't seem self-explanatory in the least.
 
It's an issue of self preservation. Isn't that better than supporting a dictatorial regime there?

We support and create dictators all the time throughout our history and we support and create terrorists .. even have our own terrorist traing camp right here in Georgia.

Russia has nukes, China has nukes .. why aren't you suggesting that it's our self-preserved right to attack them?
 
We support and create dictators all the time throughout our history and we support and create terrorists .. even have our own terrorist traing camp right here in Georgia.
SO we should keep doing it? I thought that's what was causing all the enmity around the globe?
Russia has nukes, China has nukes .. why aren't you suggesting that it's our self-preserved right to attack them?

Technically it is. But when they have nukes too, it really is like that game of thermonuclear war tick tack toe. Greeting professor Falken, WOuld you like to play a game?
 
So you think the US entered the war because of the blitz? Because of the attacks on shipping?

Why doesn't seem self-explanatory in the least.

"Why" make not be self-explanatory to you .. but that's not really meaningful.

The point is that it was self-explanatory to Allied nations and most of the world. Iraq is not.
 
SO we should keep doing it? I thought that's what was causing all the enmity around the globe?

Idiotic neocon-cowboy-pirate foreign policy is causing the problems .. as if that's a secret.

Technically it is. But when they have nukes too, it really is like that game of thermonuclear war tick tack toe. Greeting professor Falken, WOuld you like to play a game?

Sorry, not interested in games.
 
"Why" make not be self-explanatory to you .. but that's not really meaningful.

The point is that it was self-explanatory to Allied nations and most of the world. Iraq is not.

Well except all those allied with the Axis, most of which are now are 'allies.' Sigh.
 
Idiotic neocon-cowboy-pirate foreign policy is causing the problems .. as if that's a secret.



Sorry, not interested in games.

I don't know. I think the people would be happy if we left and took the nukes with us, rather than stay and MODERNIZE their society. I think supporting puppet regimes is another thing that peeves others about our behavior. Please see the whole picture, mental miniature.

Though he presents as some sort of rebel, BAC is shockingly status quo.
 
Last edited:
I don't know. I think the people would be happy if we left and took the nukes with us, rather than stay and MODERNIZE their society. I think supporting puppet regimes is another thing that peeves others about our behavior. Please see the whole picture, mental miniature.

Though he presents as some sort of rebel, BAC is shockingly status quo.

I'm sorry, did i read this right? You think the citizens of Pakistan would be "Happy" if we "took their nukes with us"?

Really.

I see.
 
It's an issue of self preservation. Isn't that better than supporting a dictatorial regime there?

Is it? We don't even know who is going to be running that country, IF Musharaff falls. Of course, you are swallowing the neocon line that Osama Bin Laden himself is going to be the new President, and shortly after he cackles his way through the oath, he's going to call up his manacial, beady-eyed,bearded pals and ask them, where do you want to put the first one, NY or Chicago?
 
So you think the US entered the war because of the blitz? Because of the attacks on shipping?

Why doesn't seem self-explanatory in the least.

I think the US entered WW II because Japan attacked us and Germany declared war against us.
 
I think the US entered WW II because Japan attacked us and Germany declared war against us.

But why? Could it possibly be the FDR had closed off all possible sources for oil for Japan? Could it be that he, the great white savior of Democrats everywhere wanted to draw us into a war? Or could it be, he wanted to draw us into a war for the best of reasons, using that as an excuse to push his programs, successfully?
 
So you think the US entered the war because of the blitz? Because of the attacks on shipping?

Why doesn't seem self-explanatory in the least.

Yes.

Do you think that if the US eastern seaboard had been blockaded by a massive Iraqi submarine fleet, and they were attacking our shipping, you would have had more support for your war? I do.
 
Yes.

Do you think that if the US eastern seaboard had been blockaded by a massive Iraqi submarine fleet, and they were attacking our shipping, you would have had more support for your war? I do.

On what premise? How would they get there from here?
 
But why? Could it possibly be the FDR had closed off all possible sources for oil for Japan? Could it be that he, the great white savior of Democrats everywhere wanted to draw us into a war? Or could it be, he wanted to draw us into a war for the best of reasons, using that as an excuse to push his programs, successfully?

Your right.

We shouldn't have fought japan and germany.
 
But why? Could it possibly be the FDR had closed off all possible sources for oil for Japan? Could it be that he, the great white savior of Democrats everywhere wanted to draw us into a war? Or could it be, he wanted to draw us into a war for the best of reasons, using that as an excuse to push his programs, successfully?

Could it be that Japan attacking us and Germany declaring war on us is historical fact, and everything you presented here is speculation?

I guess you are saying that the US asked for it? Doesn't that make you a traitor?
 
Back
Top