Prison Walls Are Closing In On Hillary Clinton

floridafan said:
He said that what she had done was not sufficient to prosecute. END of story
Personally you couldn't give a flying fuck as to the security of this nation after supporting trump.
Click to expand...

Bull shit I suggest you take your partisan head out of your ass and read Comey's statement concerning the violations found.
 
Phantasmal said:
Show me where Comey states she broke the law, thanks
Click to expand...

I will highlight it for you.

Comey's statement to congress.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice:
In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
Click to expand...

Those were violations that someone like you or I would have been tried for and jailed at a minimum.
 
Grumpy said:
I will highlight it for you.



Those were violations that someone like you or I would have been tried for and jailed at a minimum.
Click to expand...
I still do not see where he says she committed a crime as you claimed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...-sloppy-handling-classified/story?id=54487996

“I should've worked harder to find a way to convey that it's more than just the ordinary mistake, but it's not criminal behavior, and find different words to describe that,” Comey said.
 
Phantasmal said:
I still do not see where he says she committed a crime as you claimed.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...-sloppy-handling-classified/story?id=54487996

“I should've worked harder to find a way to convey that it's more than just the ordinary mistake, but it's not criminal behavior, and find different words to describe that,” Comey said.
Click to expand...

So you are going to pull the bullshit defense he didn't say it was a crime therefor no crime was committed. Law enforcement never say someone committed a crime. That is for the courts to decide.

The problem is people like you who have never worked with or handled national classified or any classified for that matter have no concept of the gravity that Hillary committed. It is entirely possible people died due to her mishandling of classified. Tell me in your eyes did the young sailor who took some unauthorized pics (none of which were classified) commit bigger crime than Hillary?

Let's pretend Hillary was SOS in 1944 and she talked openly on the phone about the plans for DDay would that have been a crime even if she didn't mean to commit a crime?
 
Grumpy said:
So you are going to pull the bullshit defense he didn't say it was a crime therefor no crime was committed. Law enforcement never say someone committed a crime. That is for the courts to decide.

The problem is people like you who have never worked with or handled national classified or any classified for that matter have no concept of the gravity that Hillary committed. It is entirely possible people died due to her mishandling of classified. Tell me in your eyes did the young sailor who took some unauthorized pics (none of which were classified) commit bigger crime than Hillary?

Let's pretend Hillary was SOS in 1944 and she talked openly on the phone about the plans for DDay would that have been a crime even if she didn't mean to commit a crime?
Click to expand...


I've handled plenty of TOP SECRET documents...and I think you are full of shit.

If you could step outside your body and mind-set...you would think you are full of shit also.
 
Grumpy said:
So you are going to pull the bullshit defense he didn't say it was a crime therefor no crime was committed. Law enforcement never say someone committed a crime. That is for the courts to decide.

The problem is people like you who have never worked with or handled national classified or any classified for that matter have no concept of the gravity that Hillary committed. It is entirely possible people died due to her mishandling of classified. Tell me in your eyes did the young sailor who took some unauthorized pics (none of which were classified) commit bigger crime than Hillary?

Let's pretend Hillary was SOS in 1944 and she talked openly on the phone about the plans for DDay would that have been a crime even if she didn't mean to commit a crime?
Click to expand...
I didn’t read your word salad, Comey says their was no prosecutable crime, she was careless but committed no crime.
 
Phantasmal said:
I didn’t read your word salad, Comey says their was no prosecutable crime, she was careless but committed no crime.
Click to expand...

Phan Phan Phan you are reading in things that weren't there.

Does this sound like no prosecutable crime.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,
Click to expand...

Reality we found violations but didn't pursue them.
 
Phantasmal said:
I got to bullshit and quit reading.
Click to expand...

Shows how much you believe in the truth. Let me put it another way why Hillary wasn't prosecuted. They found Vince Foster wrapped in chains at the bottom of the river holding a piece of Hillary's coat. Comey looks at him and turns to his assistant and says "Just like a Arkansas attorney, steal more chain than he can swim with".

That my dear is your concept of justice for Hillary.
 
Grumpy said:
Shows how much you believe in the truth. Let me put it another way why Hillary wasn't prosecuted. They found Vince Foster wrapped in chains at the bottom of the river holding a piece of Hillary's coat. Comey looks at him and turns to his assistant and says "Just like a Arkansas attorney, steal more chain than he can swim with".

That my dear is your concept of justice for Hillary.
Click to expand...
Yawn
 
Phantasmal said:
I didn’t read your word salad, Comey says their was no prosecutable crime, she was careless but committed no crime.
Click to expand...

If a Republican run Department of Justice could have gotten a jaywalking conviction against Hillary Clinton...they would have.

These people are so used to being full of shit...it comes second nature to them.

Gonna reverse Obamacare.

Gonna build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it.

Gonna put Hillary in prison.

FULL OF SHIT!
 
Grumpy said:
Phan Phan Phan you are reading in things that weren't there.

Does this sound like no prosecutable crime.

Reality we found violations but didn't pursue them.
Click to expand...

Grumpy...if your side could get her for illegal parking...they would do it.

Give it a break. You morons have nothing. But I doubt that will stop you from pretending that you have lots...but the Republican headed Department of Justice just doesn't want to prosecute.
 
Frank Apisa said:
If a Republican run Department of Justice could have gotten a jaywalking conviction against Hillary Clinton...they would have.

These people are so used to being full of shit...it comes second nature to them.

Gonna reverse Obamacare.

Gonna build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it.

Gonna put Hillary in prison.

FULL OF SHIT!
Click to expand...
Exactly, these people truly have Hillary Obsession Syndrome. Barr would absolutely love to
please dear leader and prosecute Hillary if he could. Sessions would have loved to do it to keep his dream job, but as Session said, there isn’t anything to prosecute.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top