Question for dipshit 3rd Party voters
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
"Ends justify the means" is a BIG red flag for me because it implies that someone is going to suffer needlessly.
There is no virtue in suffering.
buh bye Joe....LMAO!
You could go anywhere during COVID, it's just that some places didn't want to accommodate you.
That's not brutality, that's capitalism.
And you lost the 2020 election because of your big mouth, not cheating.
Kinda weird that Trump would lavish praise on China for two straight months at the beginning of COVID.
Why did he do that if China is responsible?
So you're saying that the vaccines people got somehow managed to leave their bodies and alter vote count results?
Those must be SOME vaccines!
False.
The claim of no members is your straw man fallacy. You have a habit of assigning what you want your opponent to say rather than dealing with what we actually say.
You're flailing.
It's obvious that one of the fascist hate sites that do your thinking for you is panicking that a third-party candidate will act as a spoiler against Quid Pro.
This assumes that Bought and Paid For is the candidate - which is increasingly doubtful.
And how did I "screw up" about third party candidate Lincoln winning the presidency? Because you stomped your feet and screamed "nuhn uhn?
ROFL
You are a clown.
How do I know this? Because it's what the Constitution says.
Legislation has to be introduced in Congress to be voted on. If the 3P POTUS doesn't have any members of Congress from his party, then who introduces the legislation in committee?
Who votes for it in committee?
Who convinces the Speaker of the House to bring it to a vote? I'll give you a hint...It's not POTUS.
None of these are rhetorical questions.
No.
You just didn't bother to ask these questions before committing yourself to a losing argument.
That's not what I said at all.
What I said was that the economy entered a recession BEFORE the lockdowns.
According to Fox News, the recession started in February 2020, the lockdowns didn't start until March. And manufacturing was in a recession for all of 2019.
So is time not linear in Conservatardia?
There were no lockdowns in 2019, so once again you're lying and making stuff up because you're losing the argument and it's upsetting you.
NOPE! Not even then! The best annual GDP growth rate Trump got was 2.85% in 2018...short of the 3% promised from the tax cut and 0.04% below Obama's best annual GDP growth rate.
So you're not even accurate when you lie about the economy.
What data are you looking at that is leading you to that conclusion because there's nothing in the data that says 2017-2018 were the best years for our economy...how can that be when the annual GDP growth rate didn't even top Obama's?!
What does "becoming a Republic" mean? None of you seem to know.
When Lincoln ran for office in 1860, the Republican Party controlled 106/180 seats in the House and 26/66 seats in the Senate.
So the Republican Party, by 1860, was the majority party in the House of Representatives.
Every time you open your mouth, you fuck over your argument because you don't know what you're talking about.
Lincoln was technically a third-party president.
The fledgling Republicans were a scant 6 years in existence. The major parties were the Whig and democrats.
No, you got so angry because I destroyed your stupid argument so now you're trying to save face by moving goalposts and pretending to be a victim.
The only thing you are a victim of is your own poor judgment and ignorance.
What a loser.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you are the prime example, other than evince, of women are unable to think logically and go simply off of emotion. If you were concerned, at all, about democracy, you'd be out there fighting against the 2 party system, but you can't do that because you have no courage to do so.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
another good example of your inability to use logic. you can't use 'congress' as a measure of the majority of voters in one instance and deny it in the next, deferring to the presidential majority. It is wholly illogical and shows that your thread here is nothing more than a 3rd party bashfest, which you hugely failed at doing.
When Lincoln ran for President in 1860, Republicans controlled 116/183 House seats and 29/66 Senate seats.
So they weren't a Third Party, they were the majority party.
The only one yapping about "no congressional support" is you, with your failed straw man fallacy.
Lincoln did not run as a Whig, though he had served in Congress as a Whig. He certainly did not run as a slaver. He was not affiliated with either party.
But I find it good that you are in such a panic over third party candidates. It shows you know how unpopular your filthy Reich is.
This guy was definitely home schooled because by 1860, Republicans controlled a majority of House seats and 26/66 Senate seats.
The major parties in 1860 were the Democrats and Republicans.