Conservatives think the after 9 months in the womb it is time for the parents to take over the baby's care and not turn it over to the government.
And what if the mother didn't want to BE a parent, but was forced to -- by the government?
Conservatives think the after 9 months in the womb it is time for the parents to take over the baby's care and not turn it over to the government.
No, it's not entirely fair; but when the woman has vaginal sex, she knows what she's risking, It's not like she has no choice in the matter.
Yes, it's not entirely fair, but when a guy has vaginal sex, he knows what he's risking. It's not like he has no choice in the matter.
Why? They have all the same welfare benefits under both Democrats and Republicans and those benefits continue to increase. This year's budget increased discretionary non-defense spending 11%. If Republicans require work for able bodied adults without children that has no effect on the baby.
If she doesn't want to get preggers, then she should refrain from vaginal sex too. She should get a man who eats pussy.
So pretty much any idea you don't like.
This is a hypothetical, obviously, because its not realistic.
Lets assume that upon conception, there is no developmental stage of the fetus. It's just "poof" and then there is a fully formed baby in the womb right off the bat. However, the baby would still need to be in the womb for 9 months before birth.
Should abortion still be allowed in these cases?
If so, why. If not, why not?
I already agreed to this.
Grind are you old enough to remember back alley,coat hanger abortions?
Making abortion illegal doesn't end abortion!
Did illegal pot,stop pot smoking?
Does this mean we can finally abolish speed zones that are too slow for my taste?
Then why were you being one sided in your sexism and initially trying to say the guy had the responsibility??
Idiotic reply
Mason is shocked that one kind of murder will not vanish once it becomes criminalized.
I didn't say that. I said that the guy has a choice in the matter in response to someone saying it's not entirely fair for the guy, a point I agreed with.
This is what happens when you jump in the middle of a conversation specifically to try to disagree with someone.
The male has a choice here too. If he doesn't want to risk having to provide, simply don't have vaginal sex.
if someone said that about a woman they would be called sexist.
Then why just mention the guy, instead of making it both gender inclusive.
if someone said that about a woman they would be called sexist.
Exactly. Men who are against abortion should be keeping it in their pants, and instructing their sons to do likewise.
Grind are you old enough to remember back alley,coat hanger abortions?
Making abortion illegal doesn't end abortion!
Did illegal pot,stop pot smoking?
Exactly. Men who are against abortion should be keeping it in their pants, and instructing their sons to do likewise.