Question for you Anti-Assault rifle people

Miss Margot Frank said:
How about the Wal-Mart and Dayton murders?
Gun nuts have ever accuse to keep their weapons of war
Click to expand...

Self defenders don't have weapons of war, and our guns never harm innocent people you sick fuck. Fuck you for wanting to leave innocent people at the mercy of violent criminals. FUCK YOU.
 
Truth Detector said:
This statement can only be made in ignorance. Have you ever hunted or fired a weapon?



Banning all semi-automatic weapons will not stop mass murders. The worst mass murder in the US was committed using airliners.

France has a strict ban on such weapons; yet they have had several instances where REAL assault weapons and grenades were used to commit murder. Why do people like you think criminals obey laws? That's painfully naive and stupid.

November 2015 Paris attacks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks

Charlie Hebdo shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

Toulouse and Montauban shootings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toulouse_and_Montauban_shootings
Click to expand...

And let's not forget this one:

On the evening of 14 July 2016, a 19-tonne cargo truck was deliberately driven into crowds of people celebrating*Bastille Day*on the*Promenade des Anglais*in*Nice, France, resulting in the deaths of 86 people[2]*and the injury of 458 others.
Click to expand...

That whack job killed and injured more than the Las Vegas shooter. No "assault rifles" required.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_truck_attack
 
Jade Dragon said:
Capable of a mass assault against groups of people. That's a weapon for attack, not basic protection. Civilians don't need to clear a space of enemies or blast away a hippo in civilian life. They aren't even practical when compared to a good pistol.
Click to expand...

You think an AR-15 would kill a hippo? God you're a retard.
 
Gonzomin said:
Oh, the old define it away trick. This is not new. We all know this game.
Weapons of war that are designed to kill lots of people in as fast as a way possible do not belong in society. They will be used and misused. They make us all less safe.
Gun lovers are prioritizing gun ownership over the rights of people to live in relative peace.
Click to expand...

You are prioritizing your paranoia about guns over the rights of people to be able to defend their lives. Those "weapons of war" are exactly what is needed for a well regulated militia.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Cypress said:
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
"Assault Rifle" (definition)
"Any of various intermediate-range, magazine-fed military rifles (such as the AK-47) that can be set for automatic or semiautomatic fire; also: a rifle that resembles a military assault rifle but is designed to allow only semiautomatic fire."


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/assault rifle

It is extremely curious that teabaggers have suddenly and very belatedly become reticent to call these things assault rifles.

Teabaggers have spent message board careers claiming the 2nd amendment allows them to be prepared to overthrow a tyrannical government by military force if necessary.

If you are going to play Rambo and take on the armed forces of a tyrannical government, surely you would need weaponry that at least approximates military capability in range, ammo capacity, ballistics, , aka assault rifles.
Click to expand...
The last bit of that definition is only because the control freaks started misusing the term.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top