Questions that Wingnut Presidential Candidates need to Answer

Damocles said:
The embryo, while inside, growing. Is one complete life. It isn't "potential life" while it is alive. That is plain ridiculous.

Once again, one can argue whether the embryo is yet a "person", but not that it isn't alive or that it isn't human. One can argue as to when rights apply to this particular life, but not that it is only a potential life, as it is clearly alive it is already life, not "potential", it is a reality.
Click to expand...

One complete functionaing human being.

The embryo cannot survive without the host, it is a parasite in a sense.

If the complete functionaing human life chooses to harbor it then fine, if not then its that persons choice, NO ONE ELSES!
 
doniston said:
allowing abortions is no more "ending" human life than ejackulating in your hand, or having a normal menstrational period.

they also are potential human lives
Click to expand...
They are potential human lives, however an embryo is a human life while it is growing and developing.

Sperm has only half of what it takes to be a human, as does an ovum. It is when they combine that a human life is formed.

Therefore you scenario is ridiculous, and flatly scientifically incorrect.
 
Desh said:
One complete functionaing human being.

The embryo cannot survive without the host, it is a parasite in a sense.

If the complete functionaing human life chooses to harbor it then fine, if not then its that persons choice, NO ONE ELSES!
Click to expand...
Nor can an infant survive without dependence. That doesn't change that it is a complete human life.

Dependence is not the measure of humanity else we would have no infanticide laws.
 
But the infant can be raised by others than just the mother ,hell there are instances of them being raised by ohter species.
 
I can't wait until science evolves to a point where an aborted fetus can implanted in men or other women if they want to carry it to term. Then we'll see who's really "pro-life"
 
Desh said:
But the infant can be raised by others than just the mother ,hell there are instances of them being raised by ohter species.
Click to expand...
And embryos have been successfully implanted in different mothers. Your point is irrelevant.
 
LadyT said:
I can't wait until science evolves to a point where an aborted fetus can implanted in men or other women if they want to carry it to term. Then we'll see who's really "pro-life"
Click to expand...
Me too.

As I have said, I think we should work toward expediting ex-utero incubation so that the choices are not limited to kill or be an incubator for any woman.

Believe me, I am not arguing at this time that because the embryo is a complete human life that it means that abortions should be illegal. That is only an assumption.

I am only arguing the science of it.
 
Desh said:
One complete functionaing human being.

The embryo cannot survive without the host, it is a parasite in a sense.

If the complete functionaing human life chooses to harbor it then fine, if not then its that persons choice, NO ONE ELSES!
Click to expand...

So even when you are provided with the correct argument for abortion, you are STILL going to cling to the idiotic claims like the above?

Why do you hate science Desh? Is the earth still flat? Does gravity not really exist? You don't believe in evolution?

Science disagrees with you 100%. That by itself does not mean abortions should be legalized. As I said, you can argue whether or not human rights should be assigned to an unborn child. THAT is a valid argument. One that would not make you look like the leftwingnut retard that you are.
 
Cypress said:
Oh be honest.

We men are always saying to each other, that we can't believe how much pain and effort women in labor and childbirth go through. We practically faint at the mere thought of it. ;)
Click to expand...

There was nothing dishonest about it. I did not say that it would be easy to do.
 
Superfreak said:
I have no problem with that.
Click to expand...
Neither do I, in fact that idea is being played with in England and Devito/Swartzy stared in a movie years ago called "JUNIOR"

(I wrote a similar story Called "INVITRO SAM")
 
Last edited:
Darla said:
Even if they could make it so that men could carry and nurish a fetus, it's not going to be painful. It would come out by ceasarian section, of course.
Click to expand...
Surgery is painful, and as far as I understand it uncomfortable...
 
Damocles said:
And embryos have been successfully implanted in different mothers. Your point is irrelevant.
Click to expand...


Then they need to develop a method of removing and reimplanting it in ohter people and then Like Darla said we will see who is really"pro fetus".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top