Surgery is painful, and as far as I understand it uncomfortable...
Is that your out or excuse for not wanting to carry it? "Its painful"?
Surgery is painful, and as far as I understand it uncomfortable...
LMAO......oh you mean if other people volunteer you have no problem with that.
I'm calling BS.
No male on this board, is going to put his career and his family on hold, to carry and give birth to some random embryo from a fertility clinic.
I'm calling BS.
No male on this board, is going to put his career and his family on hold, to carry and give birth to some random embryo from a fertility clinic.
Then they need to develop a method of removing and reimplanting it in ohter people and then Like Darla said we will see who is really"pro fetus".
1) We are not talking about random embryos
2) We are not talking about embryos fertilized at a fertility clinic
3) You are the king of strawmen.
No, I mean I have no problem with that.
That has always been my position...Then they need to develop a method of removing and reimplanting it in ohter people and then Like Darla said we will see who is really"pro fetus".
Lady T.....
Would I do so if it were my child... yes. I believe in personal responsibility for my actions. I believe we choose whether or not to have sex. We choose whether or not to use protection. If the results of my actions are a child and the woman decides to abort my child... without question, if the technology were available to do so, I would carry the child.
I would not likely do so if it was not my child.
Lady T.....
Would I do so if it were my child... yes. I believe in personal responsibility for my actions. I believe we choose whether or not to have sex. We choose whether or not to use protection. If the results of my actions are a child and the woman decides to abort my child... without question, if the technology were available to do so, I would carry the child.
I would not likely do so if it was not my child.
You'd be comfortable with all those children dying knowing you could do something to save them?
thanks this is a reasonable and honest answer. And I venture to say that this would be the same answer for 99.99999% of anti-abortion men: those who pound their fists on the table, and proclaim that excess blastocyts in a fertility clinic that are destined for disposal, are in fact "human beings".
But, evidently the belief that these blastocysts are "human beings" in need of rescue, is pretty shallow amongst these table-pounders.
and again, here comes the strawman. a fertilized egg that implants itself and begins to grow and develop is most certainly a human being. A fertilized egg in a petri dish is NOT ALIVE. Now is it?
and again, here comes the strawman. a fertilized egg that implants itself and begins to grow and develop is most certainly a human being. A fertilized egg in a petri dish is NOT ALIVE. Now is it?
You can call them blastocysts all you want, call them fetus while you are at it. Genetically it will NOT change the fact that they are a unique human life. Or do you really believe in the magic baby fairy that comes along and "turns" your "blastocyst" into a real live human?