Romney on Energy and Climate Change

That seems rather rediculous to me.

From what I have seen at this point is that schools teach children to be tolerant of homosexuals and that they are human like anyone else.

Saying that this is worship doesn't follow. Worship implies that homosexuals would be elevated above heterosexuals by a large margin. I don't see this happening.

It is happening, and it is ridiculous.
 
I put "homosexual worship schools" into google this is what I got.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200703/CUL20070330a.html

this article is opposed to the national day of silence. I don't agree with national day of silence being observed in public school but it isn't worship either.

http://www.thelionofjudah.org/newsletter/december_2000.htm

This article also rails against tolerance and acceptance programs. Some of their concerns may be valid but again nothing they are railing against here equates to homosexual worship either.
 
I put "homosexual worship schools" into google this is what I got.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200703/CUL20070330a.html

this article is opposed to the national day of silence. I don't agree with national day of silence being observed in public school but it isn't worship either.

http://www.thelionofjudah.org/newsletter/december_2000.htm

This article also rails against tolerance and acceptance programs. Some of their concerns may be valid but again nothing they are railing against here equates to homosexual worship either.

"Homosexual aggrandizement" . try that, mr. disprover-head.
 
If you mean aggrandizement as in an attempt to improve one's station than you have no argument here.

If you mean it is trying to exalt homosexuality I would disagree.
 
Notice he didn't deny the socialism-worship charge.
Whatever. He is questioning the exaggeration of one thing at a time. "Worship" is nothing like what they teach about homosexuality in the schools. When they do teach it, it is to say don't bully them and treat them like people. If you call that worship then, wow, we've all be worshipped in the past.
 
how about widen in scope, or intensity, or make appear greater than it is?

We'll have to be more specific. If you mean make it appear greater by elevating it from being something worthy of getting you ass beat for to accepting it as anothers personal choice than year it is elevating it.

That doesn't bother me though. Does it bother you and why?
 
how about widen in scope, or intensity, or make appear greater than it is?

We'll have to be more specific. If you mean make it appear greater by elevating it from being something worthy of getting you ass beat for to accepting it as anothers personal choice than year it is elevating it.

That doesn't bother me though. Does it bother you and why?


Why don't you avail yourself of the standard quoting mechanism. I hate being italicized. It makes me feel like a wop.
 
Back
Top