Sexy AOC Makes A Statement

Dutch Uncle said:
Let's be honest, evince. You might old enough to remember the 1968 election which epitomized the Democratic mindset which we still see today; populist and anti-military.

What's changed from then to now is that the Republicans are now also populist and anti-military, but now they are doing worse than just spitting on the troops; they are constantly demeaning and eroding it as an institution for political aims.
Click to expand...

Post 424
 
Damocles said:
I'll watch for that in the future. If you are posting a new thread so you can opine on a subject you are banned from use something to tell me so I don't just merge stuff...

Usually they say something like "Part 2" or something at the end. But you can just add a "because I was banned" or something like that at the top of the post and I'll figure it out.
Click to expand...
Isn't that putting the burden upon the person banned because the banner is a pussy? Not that the situation comes up that much.

Part 2 is a good idea. Exact title matches should be avoided to prevent merger. I presume "-- F**K YOU!" would be an acceptable addition.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Damo,



It would be better to simply forbid copy cat threads. They make the thread ban feature useless and confuse discussions with two nearly identical threads. I appreciate having minimal rules but there doesn't seem to be much point in a thread ban feature if copy cat threads are allowed.

Naturally, it is ever so easy for me to sit here and create more work for you...

I'll have no beef if you blow my suggestion right off.

I thank you and appreciate what you do.
Click to expand...

I hear what you are saying, however i created the site to hold conversations not to proudly feature the ban from thread modification. If folks want to start a new thread with a different ban list on the same subject we normally would allow it. Basically, you didn't want them in your thread and they aren't. The feature isn't designed, or wasn't added, to make folks shut up just because someone who starts a thread dislikes them.
 
Damocles said:
I hear what you are saying, however i created the site to hold conversations not to proudly feature the ban from thread modification. If folks want to start a new thread with a different ban list on the same subject we normally would allow it. Basically, you didn't want them in your thread and they aren't. The feature isn't designed, or wasn't added, to make folks shut up just because someone who starts a thread dislikes them.
Click to expand...



It was used to keep me out because I kept turning out to be correct and was able to prove you guys wrong
 
While you guys and gals were discussing the "red spray paint job" on the dress, I looked back to the first page and checked the pictures and I noticed something.

IMG_2043.JPG


Notice those semi transparent tapes over the letters?
 
I would post threads with fully documented facts


And you chicken shits wouldn’t post in them


Then banned me from most of the threads


Truth hurts


I have have still never banned anyone


But now you make it look like I BAN KAZ



I WISH HE WASNT BANNED FROM MY THREADS


I don’t ban anyone
 
AProudLefty said:
While you guys and gals were discussing the "red spray paint job" on the dress, I looked back to the first page and checked the pictures and I noticed something.

IMG_2043.JPG


Notice those semi transparent tapes over the letters?
Click to expand...



Yeap it’s cloth or tape
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Damo,



Everyone at the MET gala was required to show proof of vaccination and wear a mask when not eating or drinking.

Only one NFL season football franchise required vaccination, and it was a bit soft at that. Fans were allowed in if they could show proof of vaccination or if they agreed to get their first shot on site prior to entry and then wear a mask once inside. All of the rest of the football games with thousands of animated people in close proximity and lots of yelling, screaming and heavy breathing required no proof of vaccination nor mask wearing. Some of the games did require / suggest mask wearing in the hallways, bathrooms and concessions.

I estimated that many stadiums contained over 3500 Active Cases of COVID-19.

Being outdoors was a big help in reducing transmission as long as it was windy enough to keep the air moving, but if any of those games was played with no wind, the risk of transmission went up by many factors. But the fact that so many people remained in such close proximity for so many hours increased the risk of transmission. It is probable that COVID-19 has been spread at most games. Hope nobody dies because of it. And, of course, just because somebody got it doesn't mean that's where it ends. They will likely go on to spread it to someone else, particularly if they don't even know they are a carrier. Others could die who didn't even go to any of the games.
Click to expand...

It's spreadinggggg! Run fer yur lives!!!!! Ohhhh!

I'm gonna call you Chicken Little from now on.
 
Jack said:
"The Democrat used the Met Gala — where tickets cost $35,000 each and business tycoons mingle with celebrities — to make a political statement."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...h-dress-to-met-gala-where-tickets-cost-35-000

"The gown was designed by Aurora James, founder of New York shoe and handbag line Brother Vellies and the Fifteen Percent Pledge, which asks retailers to dedicate 15% of their shelves to products made by Black-owned businesses."

Sounds like a promotional stunt.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

The gown was donated by the designer to help promote her designer label.
 
evince said:
They were anti wars designed to feed the military industrial complex
Click to expand...

What's your favorite beverage, evince? I like Hawaiian Punch, Milk, Fresca and unsweetened tea. Coffee in the morning and Jagermeister in the afternoon, of course.
 
What would it be like if AOC triggered you guys and you did not react? How about saying " I am not reacting to that setup". I know, not possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top