Should Trump Ban Property Taxes Nationwide?

Oh. the stupidity.
The stupidity is the fact that "home ownership" is supposedly the American Dream, but once you have it you are forever in debt to your government. You never truly own it as you have to continue earning the rights to keep it.
You are just showing us how stupid you are.
From the moron who says revenue collections can't be shifted elsewhere. Dude, that was a really stupid thing to say! :rofl2:
 
I'd also say it would be a great incentive to get more people to be owners rather than renters. The Left loves renters because it gives them more control over them in increasing government. The Left hates the idea that someone could outright own stuff and the government can't take it away.

Perfect example of how the democrats are socialists to the extreme. Big government control socialists.
 
The stupidity is the fact that "home ownership" is supposedly the American Dream, but once you have it you are forever in debt to your government. You never truly own it as you have to continue earning the rights to keep it.
Yes. You have to pay for all those services that protect that property and allow you to keep it. Don't want police protection? How long before you don't own that property because someone bigger and stronger took it from you. Don't want the government to have a record of your ownership? How long before someone else claims it as their own and you have no legal recourse? It appears you haven't even read the most basic political treatises which explain how and why you pay taxes to protect you and your rights.
From the moron who says revenue collections can't be shifted elsewhere. Dude, that was a really stupid thing to say! :rofl2:
Cities are notorious for trying to lure businesses by promising no or low property taxes. How many businesses will stay in cities that want to increase their business taxes dramatically so home owners pay no taxes? The thing about problem solving is you have to look at more than just your desired outcome. You have to look at everything that can and will go wrong and plan for them.
 
Counties and cities have gasoline taxes? Do you even own property if you think that the gasoline tax pays for the city street in front of your house.
Are you retarded? Roads are not just county or city owned and paid for. States provide funding to lower levels of government for road maintenance, just as the federal government does.

Also, your statement "...if you think that the gasoline tax pays for the city street in front of your house" is really just a non sequitur. It doesn't fucking matter where the tax money comes from. It matters that there is tax money for that purpose. Therefore, if property taxes on a primary residence didn't exist--my argument--those taxes could, and would, be made up elsewhere. Or are you telling me that is impossible and that only taxation of all property is necessary to derive those taxes from the public?

Your argument is in essence, There is no alternative to taxing property to pay for certain government services... That is utterly idiotic.
 
Are you retarded? Roads are not just county or city owned and paid for. States provide funding to lower levels of government for road maintenance, just as the federal government does.

Also, your statement "...if you think that the gasoline tax pays for the city street in front of your house" is really just a non sequitur. It doesn't fucking matter where the tax money comes from. It matters that there is tax money for that purpose. Therefore, if property taxes on a primary residence didn't exist--my argument--those taxes could, and would, be made up elsewhere. Or are you telling me that is impossible and that only taxation of all property is necessary to derive those taxes from the public?

Your argument is in essence, There is no alternative to taxing property to pay for certain government services... That is utterly idiotic.
I never said they county and city weren't provided some funding. They are not however provided all the funding. It's clear you have never had to pay an assessment for road work in front of your home. Most people roll those into their property taxes to pay over time.
 
I never said they county and city weren't provided some funding. They are not however provided all the funding. It's clear you have never had to pay an assessment for road work in front of your home. Most people roll those into their property taxes to pay over time.
In Arizona, you never have to pay an assessment for road work in front of your house. Last year, they did a chip seal of the entire neighborhood I live in and updated several speed bumps. The metro Phoenix area also is slowly putting a heat barrier finish on streets to lower temperatures from pavement.


I will add that the Biden administration gave Peoria where I live millions upon millions of dollars to install ADA compliant handicap accessible crossings at all intersections that NOBODY WILL EVER USE! What a fucking waste of tax dollars that is.

ADA-Requirements-For-A-Sidewalk-1024x576.jpg


That is utterly asinine. Like somebody's going to go out in a wheelchair on a 110 degree + day and tootle down the sidewalk...

The stupidity of 'one size fits all' government planning is astronomical, and the waste that goes with it universal.
 
In Arizona, you never have to pay an assessment for road work in front of your house. Last year, they did a chip seal of the entire neighborhood I live in and updated several speed bumps. The metro Phoenix area also is slowly putting a heat barrier finish on streets to lower temperatures from pavement.
I wonder why there is a Phoenix city code for assessments for street work if they don't asses for street work
Upon completion of the improvements, the Council shall by ordinance, at a public hearing, determine the cost of the improvements and assess against the properties adjacent to the street improvement the total amount of the costs and expenses of the work in accordance with section 31-101(b). Notice of this public hearing shall be given to the property owners by regular mail at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. This notice shall contain:

I will add that the Biden administration gave Peoria where I live millions upon millions of dollars to install ADA compliant handicap accessible crossings at all intersections that NOBODY WILL EVER USE! What a fucking waste of tax dollars that is.

ADA-Requirements-For-A-Sidewalk-1024x576.jpg


That is utterly asinine. Like somebody's going to go out in a wheelchair on a 110 degree + day and tootle down the sidewalk...

The stupidity of 'one size fits all' government planning is astronomical, and the waste that goes with it universal.
How interesting that it's 110 degrees and daytime 24 hours ever day and 365 days a year. I don't think it's the government that's stupid.
 
Yes. You have to pay for all those services that protect that property and allow you to keep it.
There are no services that " allow me to keep it".
Don't want police protection?
Last time I called 911 for a severely drunk driver on my road, I believe the quote was... I'm sorry sir. "I can't get a deputy there for at least 20 minutes".
Out here in flyover country, we take matters in our own hands. Try to take over my home and you will have far less health problems if you had messed with the local police instead.
The drunk driver was handled "locally".
How long before you don't own that property because someone bigger and stronger took it from you.
Good luck.
Don't want the government to have a record of your ownership?
Seriously? What percent of record keeping is funded by property taxes? Don't be stupid.
How long before someone else claims it as their own and you have no legal recourse?
I have the title in my possession. My home is paid for. However, for people with mortgages, you think the bank might have an interest in defending property ownership?
It appears you haven't even read the most basic political treatises which explain how and why you pay taxes to protect you and your rights.
It appears you are terrified of a consumption tax in place of a mandatory property tax because that would give homeowners a choice.
Cities are notorious for trying to lure businesses by promising no or low property taxes. How many businesses will stay in cities that want to increase their business taxes dramatically so home owners pay no taxes?
Careful there Sparky, you are swerving dangerously close to making a great argument in support of lower taxes for corporations. You know that is forbidden talk in your world. Stop it already.
The thing about problem solving is you have to look at more than just your desired outcome. You have to look at everything that can and will go wrong and plan for them.
The thing about problem solving is that government is rarely the answer.
 
How many businesses will stay in cities that want to increase their business taxes dramatically so home owners pay no taxes?
Well, let's see...

If all my customers have an extra $3000 to $4,000 in their discretionary spending budget...

Sounds to me like a slightly different pricing structure and a very lucrative opportunity.

... but who am I besides just a hick from flyover country?
 
Only for the mansions. They have eliminated taxes on Yachts and personal jets, so this follows.
I like your thinking, but I'd rather see a libtard tax. 95% tax on all trust funds that the recipient can be verified as a libtard. They could put me in charge with making the call.

You wouldn't mind, you love taxes and who should get trust funds anyways? The government, that's who, they are the most efficient, trustworthy, effective, and ethical of all places one could send their money, right? Libtard Tax has a nice ring to it as well. What do you think?
 
Well, let's see...

If all my customers have an extra $3000 to $4,000 in their discretionary spending budget...

Sounds to me like a slightly different pricing structure and a very lucrative opportunity.

... but who am I besides just a hick from flyover country?
Possibly, but all your competition just moved to the next community over and since you are the only business you are paying all the taxes in the city where you are and they are all paying much lower taxes so they can undercut your prices. But who would think that businesses would try to reduce their taxes?
 
Possibly, but all your competition just moved to the next community over and since you are the only business you are paying all the taxes in the city where you are and they are all paying much lower taxes so they can undercut your prices. But who would think that businesses would try to reduce their taxes?
I'm not asking the businesses to put up the revenue in place of property taxes. I'm asking for a consumption tax, a sales tax. Yes, some pathetic people need more services than I do, and the people should pay for it. What I'm saying is if the extra dollars are in my pocket because I didn't send my local their $5,200 this year, I (and most others) will have no issues paying extra tax on items we will likely buy anyway.
If I happen to fall on hard times, I can choose carefully what I spend on and work my way through with no fear of the government taking away my paid for home.

Is that so ridiculous? Do you own your home? Do you have any idea what I'm talking about?
 
Yes. You have to pay for all those services that protect that property and allow you to keep it. Don't want police protection? How long before you don't own that property because someone bigger and stronger took it from you. Don't want the government to have a record of your ownership? How long before someone else claims it as their own and you have no legal recourse? It appears you haven't even read the most basic political treatises which explain how and why you pay taxes to protect you and your rights.

Cities are notorious for trying to lure businesses by promising no or low property taxes. How many businesses will stay in cities that want to increase their business taxes dramatically so home owners pay no taxes? The thing about problem solving is you have to look at more than just your desired outcome. You have to look at everything that can and will go wrong and plan for them.
Damn, that’s a tough read without pitying you and the education system that clearly dropped the ball. First off, allow me to break the news: there are multiple ways to raise tax revenue, plenty of them. As a libtard, I’d figure you’d be a guru at dreaming up creative tax schemes, but apparently, knowing stuff isn’t your forte, lol.

Why not lean on sales tax instead? You can’t evict someone from their dream home, built with blood, sweat, and tears for not buying something, right? I'll clue you in, property taxes in some spots are jacked so high, it’s obvious they’re designed to boot out residents because those wealthy elites you adore to loathe start slipping your favorite libtard politicians a few bucks to clear the way for their waterfront mansions or whatever prime spot a working-class family calls home.

Here’s the kicker: high property taxes hammer the working class, often forcing them to lose homes or land passed down for generations. Is that your grand plan? Can’t muster a better idea? You think this punishes the wealthy? Are you clueless or just painfully unimaginative? No worries, I know the answer.
 
Back
Top