Shrubbie and Maineman

dear fucking black stone hearted creep who hates children being cared for by their parents who forgo more money to have a REAL close family life,


I guess your the party of More Money instead of the family friendly party now huh?

you just epic failed
 
These are the facts.....

If you insist it was all lies, then I'm proving that those lies started in 1996 by Democrats (before Bush) and continued until the war....

If you admit like I do, that it was not lies at all, it is what was honestly believed by both Dems and Repubs at that time....being wrong is totally different than lying.

stating an opinion is not a lie. claiming something is an absolute fact when it is not, IS a lie. sorry.
 
Or Fuckwit!

Yeah, or Numb nuts, or any derogatory term that comes to mind.

By the way Beefy, since the name change policy was instituted, if you go to the member's homepage there is a user name history.

Grind and Billy are easy, Grind's location in the top right statistics corner of any post is the internet, and Billy's is Detroit.
 
yeap a fuckstain that thinks being a stay at home mom is an epic fail.


a heart made of petrified rat shit you have

Again, hearing things that were never said...

I love stay at home moms. My mom was a stay at home mom.

She had 5 kids, and we basically all grew up well below the poverty line. My dad was just a laborer. He was 65 the last year he worked, and that was the only year he ever broke an annual salary of $20,000. We were eligible for all kinds of public assistance, but we never accepted any. Instead, we were all taught to live within our means. Not be wasteful. Not be extravagant.

We didn't sit around having tantrums demanding the government stick its hands in others' pockets and give us something. As a result, we all worked our ways through college with full time jobs, and all 5 of us have at least a Bachelor's degree.
 
Obviously by "regular jobs" you mean "jobs that never lifted me out of the 47%".

Those who've spent a lifetime paying taxes rarely share your support of government largesse. Unless they've reached the Kennedy/Heinz-Kerry/Rockefeller level of wealth, when they no longer have income to tax, only capital gains. Then they make a return to supporting government largesse.

So true! Most of those who support big government are those who need it, or those who don't have to worry about how much it costs.
 
So true! Most of those who support big government are those who need it, or those who don't have to worry about how much it costs.

Yes, those rich folks trolling for another tax cut... writing off their planes and yachts as business expenses... going for tax shelters... they sure do support big govt - when it helps them.
 
So true! Most of those who support big government are those who need it, or those who don't have to worry about how much it costs.

RETARD ALERT!

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/09/who-are-47/56965/

Everyone is still trying to make sense (or in the Democrats' case, make hay with) Mitt Romney's disparging remarks about "the 47 percent," but where did he come with that number and why are these people not paying income taxes?
While Romney's statement is technically true, and widely used conservative talking point, it's highly misleading and hardly the justifies the critique that these tax shirkers "should take personal responsibility and care for their lives." Even conservative pundit Ramesh Ponnuru said that the argument was "an intellectual and political dead end." The two main problems with Romney's statement are that many of the people in that 47 percent aren't actually living off government handouts — and they don't all vote Democratic either. Economics writers all over the internet broke out the chart machines to debunk these two claims. Here's the basics:
For starters, as you probably know, the 47 percent only applies to federal income taxes: Not the numerous other taxes that people have to pay. For example, 28 percent of Americans don't pay income tax, but they do contribute payroll taxes, which is what funds the two biggest entitlement programs, Medicare and Social Security. However, they either make next to nothing in wages or they qualify for enough credits (dependent exemptions; mortgage, tuition or student loan deductions, etc) to wipe out their tax bill. A family of four that makes less than $30,000 a year can easily erase their tax liability though standard deductions. These people have jobs and may or may not receive any government assistance at all. This popular chart from the Tax Policy Center is where the 47 percent figure originates, but it shows how the numbers break down:
Breakdown3-06-17-11.gif


So that leaves 18 percent of people who do not work at all, or make so little that they don't even pay payroll taxes. More than half of that group (10 percent of people) are retired and elderly people. They live off pensions or Social Security benefits, which are not taxed. But they spent a lifetime paying into those funds and no one would call them irresponsible. Not even Mitt Romney wants to axe Social Security.
So that means that of the Americans who don't pay income taxes, 83 percent either have a job or are retired. The rest — less then 10 percent of the total population — are probably unemployed (though even unemployment benefits are taxed); are too poor to pay taxes, or simply didn't file a return. Some of them are even be rich people who found ways to avoid having any liability, although that's a very small number of Americans. Plus, depending on where they live, most people pay some form of state and local income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, or other government fees. When you total those up and compare by income group, we all come out paying about as much in taxes as our share of income:
d535ffc32f8cccfd63805b3f6081d6e6_615x450.jpg

(One other point about payroll taxes too: If you do pay them, that's 15.3% of your income (half paid by your employer, the other half by you) or about 1.5 percent more than Mitt Romney paid in taxes in 2011.)
 
Back
Top