Some questions for our leftist friends at JPP.

What I see is that Trump supporters appear to be emotionally motivated by hatred of immigrants and government.

I see again, as usual you’re planning to IGNORE the topic of the OP and scatter your opinions all over this thread to cover the fact that you have little to no intension of answering a dime’s worth of the OP questions. I’ll only humor that quest for so long!!!!!

I don’t know about Trump supporters, I never totally support any politician and I didn’t vote for Trump and I don’t hate immigrants, I hate political parties and constitutional violations. I hate the fact that our Congress is simply nothing but a gang of duopoly racketeers, political hacks, outlandish liars and creepy hate filled wasters of taxpayer’s dollars and a gang of vote buying crooks. I hate the fact that they refuse to defend our borders, while they jump at every opportunity to defend the rest of the world’s borders. I hate the fact that they refuse to reform a stupid immigration system. I hate the fact that they waste billions on a stupid Drug War a multi-billion dollar Military Industrial Complex, socialist unconstitutional welfare and corporate subsidies.

I think hatred of government is ridiculous.

I do not! We have a federal government well worthy of being hated. We have a federal government that is involved in more unconstitutional activities than constitutional activities. I think our federal government gets more and more corrupt every day. I believe, (through my studies of our founders over my near 83 years), never respected or trusted any type of central government and rightfully so. That’s exactly why they gave us the Bill Of Rights.



This is the same government we built! And the one which we can change at will, change for the better.

“WE” haven’t built a government that follows the blueprint the founders gave us for good government. “WE’VE” constructed a bloated, corrupt, incompetent, social engineering, wasteful DUOPOLY DICTATORIAL EMPIRE, not totally unlike the old Roman Empire. And we’re fiddling where we don’t belong and ignoring the burning of our Constitution!

“WE” have no PEACEFUL power to change a damned thing! The Duopoly Dictatorship owns our media, our national debate, our ballot access laws and every dime of special interest money. Just what in hell kinda right or opportunity do you truly believe you have to change anything except the faces of the duopoly Republicans and Democrats who abuse our credit card, kill off our youth in other nation’s wars, and trash our Constitution?
 
I see again, as usual you’re planning to IGNORE the topic of the OP and scatter your opinions all over this thread to cover the fact that you have little to no intension of answering a dime’s worth of the OP questions. I’ll only humor that quest for so long!!!!!

I don’t know about Trump supporters, I never totally support any politician and I didn’t vote for Trump and I don’t hate immigrants, I hate political parties and constitutional violations. I hate the fact that our Congress is simply nothing but a gang of duopoly racketeers, political hacks, outlandish liars and creepy hate filled wasters of taxpayer’s dollars and a gang of vote buying crooks. I hate the fact that they refuse to defend our borders, while they jump at every opportunity to defend the rest of the world’s borders. I hate the fact that they refuse to reform a stupid immigration system. I hate the fact that they waste billions on a stupid Drug War a multi-billion dollar Military Industrial Complex, socialist unconstitutional welfare and corporate subsidies.



I do not! We have a federal government well worthy of being hated. We have a federal government that is involved in more unconstitutional activities than constitutional activities. I think our federal government gets more and more corrupt every day. I believe, (through my studies of our founders over my near 83 years), never respected or trusted any type of central government and rightfully so. That’s exactly why they gave us the Bill Of Rights.





“WE” haven’t built a government that follows the blueprint the founders gave us for good government. “WE’VE” constructed a bloated, corrupt, incompetent, social engineering, wasteful DUOPOLY DICTATORIAL EMPIRE, not totally unlike the old Roman Empire. And we’re fiddling where we don’t belong and ignoring the burning of our Constitution!

“WE” have no PEACEFUL power to change a damned thing! The Duopoly Dictatorship owns our media, our national debate, our ballot access laws and every dime of special interest money. Just what in hell kinda right or opportunity do you truly believe you have to change anything except the faces of the duopoly Republicans and Democrats who abuse our credit card, kill off our youth in other nation’s wars, and trash our Constitution?

So...here's the thing....

You are complaining, rightfully I might add, about special interest money infecting our politics.

On this, you and I are in agreement.

Where we differ is how to combat it.

I want a system that has elections and campaigns funded entirely with public money, with a ban on donations and PACs. Doing so would eliminate the need for candidates to attend fundraisers and thousand-dollar-a-plate-dinners, it would eliminate the incentive for lobbying, and would force candidates to compete for votes rather than competing for money. I do not believe that money = speech because if that's the case, then there's no such thing as "free" speech. You can't have "free" speech if there's a price tag attached to it. Now, I don't believe that wanting an entirely publicly-funded campaign and elections is that controversial, and I have not heard a convincing argument that it is.

We both agree that special interests have far too much sway in our political system, yet I'm the only one of the two of us who has a plan for how to combat it. A plan you...oppose? Support? Thought about?

How do you propose to eliminate special interests in politics if not through publicly-financed elections and campaigns?????
 
Our Constitution is so amazing, so beautiful I cam constantly in awe. It sets up our government. To me, if you hate the government, that is the same as hating the Constitution which sets it all up.

I just hate the constitutional violations, how about you?

I trust our government FAR more than I trust for-profit mega corporations.

Then “IN MY OPINION,” you’re a damned fool! Corporations have only one “LEGAL” responsibility, and while their greed may well be immoral, they have no legal responsibility to be moral. Therefore, their duty as they see it is to make profits for their investors and themselves, that’s why they’re in business, and if they don’t, their competitors will. Thus, they’ll use every law and legal bribery opportunity to their own advantage and in America preparing and coaching their lobbyist to write legislation, advantaging themselves for our legislators to copy and institute in exchange for campaign coffer filling up’ers, isn’t illegal. And if you believe for a New York minute our duopoly political puppets don’t operate that way then your naivety is outstanding!!!

Corporations have ripped me off my entire life. They are relentless at coming up with new ways to extract my wealth away from me and give it to the very rich. I don't trust them for an instant to do the right thing. I have no representation with corporations. I have well established representation with government. It is all established by our beautiful Constitution.

Well good buddy, damned fool, you have more representation with corporations than you realize and even more than that if you have a 401K. The corporations don’t represent you unless you have invested in them. The corporations “REPRESENT” the politicians you vote for, because they invest in the corporations, and the politicians you vote for represent the corporations. That my damned fool friend is how your beloved government operates! I actually blame the politicians you vote for, I don’t vote in the duopoly’s corrupt rigged elections. And even if I did, there would be far between any viable, honest constitutionalist Republican and or Democrat worth my vote. I do believe that elected officials, have a moral responsibility for the laws they write, I have little to no belief that corporations have any moral responsibility for the legal bribery legislation they get the folks you vote for to copy into law.
 
Hello Robo,

I see again, as usual you’re planning to IGNORE the topic of the OP and scatter your opinions all over this thread to cover the fact that you have little to no intension of answering a dime’s worth of the OP questions. I’ll only humor that quest for so long!!!!!

Completely false charge. I now direct you to my post "]#94 of this thread in which I very honestly answered every single question of the OP. That was the very first post I made in this thread, a post which went unanswered by you.

I don’t know about Trump supporters, I never totally support any politician and I didn’t vote for Trump and I don’t hate immigrants,

Same here.

I hate political parties and constitutional violations.

I am not a member of any political party. I don't hate, but I favor adherence to the Constitution. Naturally, the Constitution is open to interpretation which leads to disagreement. No big. Life is not as simple as a sound byte mentality.

I hate the fact that our Congress is simply nothing but a gang of duopoly racketeers, political hacks, outlandish liars and creepy hate filled wasters of taxpayer’s dollars and a gang of vote buying crooks.

That's a lot of hatred. And I believe it is misplaced. Maybe the problem is not the people but the system. The people do change, but the problems remain. Maybe this new crop will be different. Time will tell.

I hate the fact that they refuse to defend our borders,

BS. First of all, no defense is currently needed. There is no attack, no invasion. It was a stupid decision to send troops to the border. They couldn't do anything. There were no battles to be fought, no enemy. Needy people want to build a better life for themselves. That's what is going on. Workers make our nation stronger. The great USA was built on the backs of immigrants.

while they jump at every opportunity to defend the rest of the world’s borders. I hate the fact that they refuse to reform a stupid immigration system.

It is not refusal but disagreement on what reform is appropriate.

I hate the fact that they waste billions on a stupid Drug War a multi-billion dollar Military Industrial Complex,

Right on. I agree those things are misspent funds.

socialist unconstitutional welfare and corporate subsidies.

Our safety net is part of Promoting the General Welfare. It's right there in the Preamble. Some capitalist efforts should be supported by government. It just boils down to what we believe best serves the public. I am in favor of helping industry that combats climate change. I do not favor helping industry that is engaged in wealth extraction and/or building extreme wealth inequality.

I do not! [think hatred of government is ridiculous] We have a federal government well worthy of being hated. We have a federal government that is involved in more unconstitutional activities than constitutional activities. I think our federal government gets more and more corrupt every day. I believe, (through my studies of our founders over my near 83 years), never respected or trusted any type of central government and rightfully so. That’s exactly why they gave us the Bill Of Rights.

The Constitution would never have been ratified without the Bill Of Rights. I'm glad we have that part of it. And I for one am glad we have a large government. We need that. America could not be great with a mediocre government. We would have lost WWII and all be speaking German without our large powerful government. The Great Depression would have been far more devastating if our Big Government had not come to the rescue with jobs and the basics of the safety net we now take for granted. Anybody who ran on a ticket of abolishing Social Security would lose. Hatred is a strong motivator, but it is not a positive one. Little good comes from hatred. Hatred serves to make people dislike their life. It makes no logical sense to hate. The secret of life is enjoying the passage of time. Hatred violates that. When hatred consumes an individual they hate life. I don't want to hate life. I love life. I love my life. I have no room in my life for hatred. Hatred is the basis for revenge. Revenge is a dead-end trip. Revenge does nothing for the perpetrator. It only hurts the victim. Revenge and hatred are shallow and unwise. Hatred has no place in a beautiful life. Hatred prevents having a beautiful life.

“WE” haven’t built a government that follows the blueprint the founders gave us for good government. “WE’VE” constructed a bloated, corrupt, incompetent, social engineering, wasteful DUOPOLY DICTATORIAL EMPIRE, not totally unlike the old Roman Empire. And we’re fiddling where we don’t belong and ignoring the burning of our Constitution!

Then the thing to do is roll up our shirt sleeves and get busy fixing the problems with our government instead of wasting out time hating it, which does nothing to help anything.

“WE” have no PEACEFUL power to change a damned thing!

That's false. We have the collective power. Individually, we don't have much power unless we become politically engaged, public advocates or become elected. Our power to change the government is a collective one which hinges on successfully communicating ideas to the masses and causing others to join us in support for change.

The Duopoly Dictatorship owns our media,

Only the commercial media. Fortunately, there are other sources of information if we seek them out. But individuals must take the initiative to do so, and they must learn to vet the fake news out.

our national debate, our ballot access laws and every dime of special interest money.

If it was easy to create change it would have happened already. That doesn't mean it is impossible.

Just what in hell kinda right or opportunity do you truly believe you have to change anything except the faces of the duopoly Republicans and Democrats who abuse our credit card, kill off our youth in other nation’s wars, and trash our Constitution?

I have the same rights as anybody else to engage in freedom of speech, to spread ideas, to discuss and learn. I can help on campaigns, I can contact representatives, I can write letters to the editor of publications, I could become an investigative reporter, I can vote and I could run for office. I can do anything I want. One thing is certain. Sitting around complaining and hating doesn't accomplish very much.
 
Whatever it takes. I know that a system with profits built in has to cost more than one where the goal is actually providing health care.

There’s an old saying, “you get what you pay for!” If you believe America will ever actually institute a national NON-profit healthcare system I do believe it could never happen here short of finding a way to unseat every corporate puppet politician in the swamp and replacing them with certified saints directly sent from the god of perfect socialism, of which there is absolutely no such animal, but maybe y’all lefties can pretend to invent some and force them down the throats of the uninformed and damned fools. And even if you did/do manage to institute an actual NON-profit healthcare system, (impossible), it wouldn’t work for at least 100 different reasons, the main one being it would be a totally NON-incentive operation, employing sackers and idiots and all day computer porno watchers, delivering next to nothing in services, advancements in equipment, procedures and medications.



Whatever can be reasonably provided. If a treatment is too expensive, logically that cannot be provided.

Not even to those who can afford it? Why not?

Whatever can be reasonably provided. I don't think I am special nor deserve higher quality than can be provided to all. I actually believe the quality of health care will rise when the goal of the system is to provide the best quality of health care possible for everyone, rather than to make the most money.

Then everybody should be paid the same, right? How much?



If it's not an emergency I am willing to wait my fair turn. That seems reasonable.

What’s reasonable? I’m not buying ambagious answers! When do waiting-time become unacceptable and how do you prevent them or shorten them?

Why would I be entitled to anything that anyone else isn't? If wait times are too long, then services need to be expanded to meet the demand. Seems simple enough. Just basic logic.

Seems simple only if you can produce a credible plan of expansion! What’s causing the wait times and what’s your plan to shorten them? What if there’s way too many patients for the amount of doctors? What if there’s not nearly enough doctor’s offices and hospitals for 300, 400; 500 million people? Where do you find the money for more? More medical schools? Do you lower the standards for graduating doctors? What about malpractice law suits? Who pays those bills?



The rich should pay more. The poor should pay nothing. Just like all normal progressive taxing. Taxing the rich more is what makes America great. We could not possibly be as great if we could only afford the government which could be had with a flat tax that everyone including the poor could afford.

Well friend I never understood the progressive nightmare! What degree of justice do y’all find in punishing the successful among us when they provide the opportunities to share in the wealth to every employee they create? Of what amount of justice is it to reward the lesser successful among us when most often it’s their own decisions in life that has guaranteed their lesser success?

I’m a true capitalist friend. I believe everybody should pay the same for everything regardless of their success or lack thereof and have the freedom to support private charities for the wounded veterans of our wars and the folks that haven’t the physical or mental abilities to provide for themselves I only call welfare programs and corporate subsidies constitutional when they’re State programs and they’re unconstitutional when they’re federal programs. I say if the folks want a Single Payer healthcare program let them pass a constitutional amendment for a federal program if that’s their wish or let them promote and pass State legislation to institute a State Single Payer program.
 
All an insurance company does is administration.

It's not germane to health care delivery at all.

It's a part of the process that happens after your doctor treats you.

The added cost and complications are germane. Insurance companies also deny the care you paid for.
 
Hello Robo,

I just hate the constitutional violations, how about you?

I don't hate. I do believe Constitutional violations are wrong and should be corrected. But there is great latitude in Constitutional interpretation. Something you call a violation may not be considered as such by another. The SCOTUS is the deciding authority.

Then “IN MY OPINION,” you’re a damned fool! [For trusting our government more than for-profit corporations] Corporations have only one “LEGAL” responsibility, and while their greed may well be immoral, they have no legal responsibility to be moral. Therefore, their duty as they see it is to make profits for their investors and themselves, that’s why they’re in business, and if they don’t, their competitors will. Thus, they’ll use every law and legal bribery opportunity to their own advantage and in America preparing and coaching their lobbyist to write legislation, advantaging themselves for our legislators to copy and institute in exchange for campaign coffer filling up’ers, isn’t illegal. And if you believe for a New York minute our duopoly political puppets don’t operate that way then your naivety is outstanding!!!

You seem predetermined to paint me with a certain brush and then disparage what it looks like. If you are aware that big money influence is the reason our government does not serve we the people as well as it should then the logical response to that is to try to find a way to eliminate the influence of big money on our government.

Well good buddy, damned fool, you have more representation with corporations than you realize and even more than that if you have a 401K. The corporations don’t represent you unless you have invested in them. The corporations “REPRESENT” the politicians you vote for, because they invest in the corporations, and the politicians you vote for represent the corporations. That my damned fool friend

Sometimes when somebody does something different, and it appears foolish, it is later learned that that person has a unique perspective and was actually very wise.

is how your beloved government operates!

It is OUR government. It is just as much mine as it is yours. You can't call it mine just because I appreciate it more than you do. It is OURS.

I actually blame the politicians you vote for, I don’t vote in the duopoly’s corrupt rigged elections.

It is hard for me to understand how somebody can support the Constitution which establishes voting and then not vote. That seems illogical to me.

And even if I did, there would be far between any viable, honest constitutionalist Republican and or Democrat worth my vote. I do believe that elected officials, have a moral responsibility for the laws they write, I have little to no belief that corporations have any moral responsibility for the legal bribery legislation they get the folks you vote for to copy into law.

Agreed corporations have no moral responsibility. For that to exist, they would have to have morals. Corporations have no morals because corporations are not people.
 
That's a misleading question. You and your doctors do not currently make that decision. It is made by the for-profit insurance industry.

I disagree! You can author and sign your own end of life instructions that are legally binding. You and your doctors and family can decide your end of life services as long as you have the means to pay for them and some healthcare insurance policies cover particular services and or procedures as long as your premiums are paid. No such choices would be available with a Single Payer system as proven by the Obamacare regulations that DO HAVE a Death clause, i.e. the plug pulling regulation, somewhere on page 7 million 38 of the 4 foot stack of paper.

And the term 'federal government bureaucrat' is a loaded term designed to elicit a predicted response.

Well friend it’s only truthfully loaded to produce a reality for the folks that get it shoved down their throats. The law will require it and a government bureaucrat will see to it that the regulation is followed.

These decisions need to be made on the basis of availability and cost.

Well friend if you truly believe that then you should be supporting the folk’s freedom to CHOSE for themselves as recommended by their doctors and family as long as they pay for it, like I support!


There should probably be boards of experts to make the determinations in tough cases. These boards should be subject to public oversight, and comprised of people who work for and answer to us, we the people.

What happened to your “LOADED” terms? You claim there’s no government bureaucrats involved in those issues, then propose a whole truck load of em to make decisions for you, your family and your doctors.
 
Hello Robo,

I see you are finally now responding to my first post #94 of this thread. And you are doing this after wrongly claiming that I never did respond to the OP and had no intention to:

I see again, as usual you’re planning to IGNORE the topic of the OP and scatter your opinions all over this thread to cover the fact that you have little to no intension of answering a dime’s worth of the OP questions. I’ll only humor that quest for so long!!!!!

Do you have a problem with acknowledging it when you made a mistake? No apology for claiming I had no intention to answer the questions of the OP; when in truth I already had? Refusing to admit to mistakes could lead to having inaccurate political views and believing in things which just are not so.

There’s an old saying, “you get what you pay for!” If you believe America will ever actually institute a national NON-profit healthcare system I do believe it could never happen here short of finding a way to unseat every corporate puppet politician in the swamp and replacing them with certified saints directly sent from the god of perfect socialism, of which there is absolutely no such animal, but maybe y’all lefties can pretend to invent some and force them down the throats of the uninformed and damned fools. And even if you did/do manage to institute an actual NON-profit healthcare system, (impossible), it wouldn’t work for at least 100 different reasons, the main one being it would be a totally NON-incentive operation, employing sackers and idiots and all day computer porno watchers, delivering next to nothing in services, advancements in equipment, procedures and medications.

You are entitled to your opinion. The problem with it is: Non-profit Universal Health Care already works so well in other countries. They spend less, live longer. Nobody goes medically bankrupt. I don't understand why those concepts might be distasteful. Those sound like good things to me. Why should people work hard without the reward of more profits? Ask most American workers. They don't get the profits if they work harder. They get to keep their job.

Most American workers are very diligent in their work and they have zero incentive for working hard other than if they don't work hard they lose their job. People like doing a good job and accomplishing things. Our entire military operates without capitalism. Very dedicated people who believe serving their nation is an excellent motivator. In the UK, health care professionals get advancement and higher pay if they produce better results, ie, their patients are healthier. Makes sense to me. They are proud to serve their nation just like those in the military. And let me tell you something. The people in the military are not a bunch of slackers.

I said, in response to the question of what quality of services should be provided: "Whatever can be reasonably provided. If a treatment is too expensive, logically that cannot be provided."

Not even to those who can afford it? Why not?
I don't see why that should be precluded. If a rich person wants to pursue a prohibitively expensive treatment, he should be free to do so on his own dime.

Then everybody should be paid the same, right? How much?

No, I didn't say that. I think health care professionals should be paid well for what they do. I think doctors should be well-off, but I do not think doctors should be making a killing or be getting super-rich by over charging for saving people's lives as those people go broke paying for it. And some of them die for lack of ability to pay.

What’s reasonable?

If care is needed immediately then it should be provided immediately. If it is not life-threatening then go into the queue.

I’m not buying ambagious answers! When do waiting-time become unacceptable and how do you prevent them or shorten them?

We already have wait times under our current system. Some doctors don't even accept new patients at all, so the wait time for that doctor is infinity. To reduce wait times, the obvious solution is to have more capacity to provide services. So our medical school capacity needs to be expanded. Part of the problem with that is that is not happening. Ivy League schools do not expand. They simply become more and more elite. The size of each class each year remains the same. That is hurting our nation, adding to the class war. Doctoring is nothing but knowledge and skill plus experience. It's not like doctors are special. They are just smart dedicated people. Guess what. There are LOTS of smart dedicated people. We can and should train more doctors and medical professionals.

We should tax the super-rich more to pay for free college to produce the medical workers our nation needs. Leaving it up to the elite institutions is failing our national needs, falling short of demand. We need great new schools with expanded capacity to churn out doctors at an unprecedented pace. There is nothing about practicing medicine that is magical or voodoo. It has become far too exclusive. We should have so many doctors that doctor pay becomes more in line with any other workers. Doctors are not god and it is time they stopped getting away with acting like they are so special. They are just people doing a job and their attitude needs to change. The cushy days of being an exclusive doctor need to be OVER. It should be about administering quality care on the scale needed by the nation, not getting rich or gaining prestige.

Seems simple only if you can produce a credible plan of expansion! [That can be done] What’s causing the wait times and what’s your plan to shorten them? [insufficient capacity] What if there’s way too many patients for the amount of doctors? [That's the case] What if there’s not nearly enough doctor’s offices and hospitals for 300, 400; 500 million people? Where do you find the money for more? [tax the super-rich] More medical schools? [Yes, government ones] Do you lower the standards for graduating doctors?

No, you find more efficient ways to teach the knowledge. It's not magic, right? It is just knowledge. Smart people can learn it. There are a lot of smart people who never get the chance because they are not from a rich family. Our current system leaves a vast potential completely untapped because of exclusivity.

What about malpractice law suits? Who pays those bills?

Good question. Maybe we need to revamp that whole system, too. I would favor a National Health Service. Perhaps we should look at how malpractice is handled in the UK. Doctors tend to hate lawyers. Doctors also have a tendency to think they can do no wrong. But they are not perfect. Doctors are not god. The are humans and they can make mistakes. Maybe if all doctors worked for the government, then the government would stand behind them when they mess up. And then perhaps the government would be motivated to make certain that bad doctors are eliminated from the system. Solving malpractice settlements could protect doctors and reduce the cost of health care.

Well friend I never understood the progressive nightmare! What degree of justice do y’all find in punishing the successful among us when they provide the opportunities to share in the wealth to every employee they create?

That is a total misnomer. Nobody from the left talks about punishing success. Those are words put into the mouths of the left by the right. If you would listen to what we actually say you would have a better idea of our positions. If you just want to regurgitate rhetoric that orginated on the right then that won't accomplish any understanding or constructive dialog. That would be the same as making a mistake and then pretending you never made it, glossing right over it, brushing it under the carpet. Well, one can fool oneself like that, but it is becoming increasingly impossible to fool others. And there is no way you can fool everybody. The world thrives on progress. Being progressive is being part of the world that naturally progresses. Things change and we are taking control of the changes. We are changing our nation for the better. We are making America a better place to live. Universal health care is part of that.

Of what amount of justice is it to reward the lesser successful among us when most often it’s their own decisions in life that has guaranteed their lesser success?

That amounts to blaming the poor for being born that way. The super-rich aggressively act to close doors and shut out chances for success for the disadvantaged, then blame them for 'making poor decisions.' Not buying that line of poppycock. Equal opportunity is a myth. Upward mobility is hardly existent for the lower half of the nation. And ya wanna know what's more? That level of available opportunity is getting harder to reach as time goes by. When I look back on my life and I think about the opportunities I seized, those don't exist any more. I couldn't take a protege under my arm and teach him how to be successful the way I was. The jobs I did don't exist any more. I was lucky to get while the gettin was good. I would not want to have to start out fresh as an 18yo in today's world. It's tougher now.

I’m a true capitalist friend. I believe everybody should pay the same for everything regardless of their success or lack thereof and have the freedom to support private charities for the wounded veterans of our wars and the folks that haven’t the physical or mental abilities to provide for themselves I only call welfare programs and corporate subsidies constitutional when they’re State programs and they’re unconstitutional when they’re federal programs. I say if the folks want a Single Payer healthcare program let them pass a constitutional amendment for a federal program if that’s their wish or let them promote and pass State legislation to institute a State Single Payer program.

If it takes a US Constitutional amendment then maybe that is what we will do. We are strong. We are growing in number and we demand a government that Promotes the General Welfare. It is a crying shame that the richest nation on Earth can't provide health care for all in this nation. That is just shameful. Especially when some are SO rich. That's just not right. We are going to fix that one way or another. The numbers are on our side. There are more of us who feel this way than there are of you who want to keep everything exclusive and only available to the rich. Greedy capitalists pushed it too far, made health care too expensive. Push has come to shove. Mark my words. The old days are done. We are fixing this with you or without you.
 
You and your family, normally, and under guidelines set up logically by the system. Nobody should be able to bleed the system dry hanging on to a hopeless case. But hey. If you want to pay for endless support for a vegetable and you've got the money that's your business.

Nobody will “bleed the system dry by paying their “Private Health Insurance” premiums!!!



I don't see why it needs to be. If you want to pay more to get ripped off and make the profiteers richer, that should be your business. But there should be no break in taxes because you opt out. Anything you want to pay for is above and beyond your tax obligation. Knock yourself out making the rich richer.

Now your talking! The only revision I’d make to that statement is a criminalizing of the lobbying corporate/politician bribery system. I’m a true capitalist, but the key word there is “true” Crony capitalism is damned near as corrupt and disgusting as socialism. A constitutional amendment to limit corporate and labor union to single person donations, capped at the limits for every citizen. No corporate or labor union jobs offered as bribes to any corporate or union lobbyist or officer thereof. No collected collective money allowed, single citizen capped donations only!


It should cost less per person than it currently does. The reason is that if no other changes are made besides cutting out the middle man profits of the insurance industry money-handlers (take in money, pay out money, keep some money) then those savings are spread across the system.

The system we have could cost less with legislation deregulating the current system written by corporate lobbyist and making it open to more smaller corporate competition. And encouraging and supporting the Paul/Trump plan of cooperative organization thereby allowing the coops to buy insurance anywhere they canget the best deal like corporations and unions and the AARP do now and giving Trump credit for pushing the Congress NOW to submit legislation to lower drug prices.

Taxes will be higher to pay for it, but mostly for the super-rich.

That’s just one place where we disagree. I oppose punishing the successful to reward the lesser successful! That’s not freedom or justice, it’s socialist authoritarianism!

There will be huge savings for workers because there will be no insurance deductions from paychecks. It doesn't have to cost most workers more to cover all the currently not-covered people, because all we have to do is tax the super-rich more to pay for it.

Y’all lefties need to sell another scam! Y’all been taxing the rich for decades to pay for every phony socialist scam you can come up with! Some day you need to recognize and admit there just ain’t that many super rich folks and there ain’t that much money to pay for your vote purchasing scams
 
Hello Robo,

I see you are finally now responding to my first post #94 of this thread. And you are doing this after wrongly claiming that I never did respond to the OP and had no intention to:



Do you have a problem with acknowledging it when you made a mistake?

Not at all, I’m not a Democrat! My apologies! My accusation was made before I read all of your encyclopedia of leftist scripture.
 
Hello Robo,

I disagree! You can author and sign your own end of life instructions that are legally binding. You and your doctors and family can decide your end of life services as long as you have the means to pay for them and some healthcare insurance policies cover particular services and or procedures as long as your premiums are paid. No such choices would be available with a Single Payer system as proven by the Obamacare regulations that DO HAVE a Death clause, i.e. the plug pulling regulation, somewhere on page 7 million 38 of the 4 foot stack of paper.

You are responding to a different quote. Please keep track of what you are responding to. My above quote was in response to your question: "Who do you want to decide what medicines and treatments you can have, your doctors and you, or a federal government bureaucrat?"

Previously, I said: "the term 'federal government bureaucrat' is a loaded term designed to elicit a predicted response." (a dog whistle)

Well friend it’s only truthfully loaded to produce a reality for the folks that get it shoved down their throats. The law will require it and a government bureaucrat will see to it that the regulation is followed.

Nobody shoved anything down anybody's throat except a doctor with a wooden stick. Stop exaggerating.

Well friend if you truly believe that then you should be supporting the folk’s freedom to CHOSE for themselves as recommended by their doctors and family as long as they pay for it, like I support!

And what should become of those who cannot pay for it? They should just die?

What happened to your “LOADED” terms? You claim there’s no government bureaucrats involved in those issues, then propose a whole truck load of em to make decisions for you, your family and your doctors.

You know that some of those 'federal government bureaucrats' are actually doctors who went through medical school and achieved all the qualifications to practice medicine, right? I hope you understand that working for the US government is a good job. People who work in government serve our nation. We should rightfully be just as thankful for what they do as we are appreciative of for-profit doctors. It takes all the people doing all the jobs to make our nation what it is. None should be disparaged unless what they are doing actually hurts our nation, in which case it is what they do which should be disparaged, not the person. We need to have more respect for one another. It's the whole 'we/they' thing that really hurts us. Try watching something besides Fox Hate News.
 
Hello Robo,

Not at all, I’m not a Democrat! My apologies! My accusation was made before I read all of your encyclopedia of leftist scripture.

Thank you. Although it would have been more sincere without the slam on Dems or the complaint about in-depth answers. Sound bytes are handy but hardly true representations of issues or political views. True understanding of complex issues usually requires more thought than can be conveyed in a brief answer. And, after all, you began the thread asking for answers to why liberals feel the way we do on these things. If you wanted window dressing just breeze by the outside. If you want to know what's inside the store you have to walk in and spend some time. We can't solve our nation's toughest issues on the basis of instant gratitude.
 
Hello Robo,

Now your talking! The only revision I’d make to that statement is a criminalizing of the lobbying corporate/politician bribery system. I’m a true capitalist, but the key word there is “true” Crony capitalism is damned near as corrupt and disgusting as socialism.

More so. Capitalism has it's upside and it has it's downside, just as socialism does.

A constitutional amendment to limit corporate and labor union to single person donations, capped at the limits for every citizen. No corporate or labor union jobs offered as bribes to any corporate or union lobbyist or officer thereof. No collected collective money allowed, single citizen capped donations only!

I have actually tried to write a draft for such an Amendment. I tell you it gets pretty tricky real quick. Such an Amendment would also have unintended consequences. If you make lobbying illegal, then all groups such as the Sierra Club and the NRA would also be excluded from trying to influence legislation. And if you impose strict limits on campaign contributions then that does nothing about dark money and PACs. And if you include them then that still does nothing about a very rich individual who wants to buy PR and get his political message out there. And if that's the case then only the rich have the chance to get use PR to circulate a message? That isn't going to work very well. Some countries simply have a law outlawing any political advertising. That's hard to define and hard to enforce, and it also limits freedom of speech so it would take an Amendment to do that. And do we really want to go there? Most people would not.

The system we have could cost less with legislation deregulating the current system written by corporate lobbyist and making it open to more smaller corporate competition. And encouraging and supporting the Paul/Trump plan of cooperative organization thereby allowing the coops to buy insurance anywhere they canget the best deal like corporations and unions and the AARP do now and giving Trump credit for pushing the Congress NOW to submit legislation to lower drug prices.

Drug prices are a huge part of the problem. Deregulation is not going to fix that. What do you do with a company like Valeant Pharmaceuticals, which spent practically nothing on R&D, and instead used such funds to simply buy out other pharma companies along with their sole source products, and then jack the price of the drug up by 700%? Clearly, deregulated capitalism does not always serve the public very well. How do you prevent a company which has a product that nobody else has from jacking the price up arbitrarily? There's no free market at work. No competition. Nobody else sells that drug. What's to keep them from pricing it as high as they feel like pricing it?

I am wondering if drug R&D should be done by the government (perhaps at government universities) and drug production done by contract for the government. Then let the government price that drug wherever it needs to be to cover the costs only. The free market and capitalism is simply not a very good system to use for developing and producing drugs, because each product is unique and there is generally no competition. We can do anything we want you know. We, the People, have the power. All we have to do is agree on what we want and then make our government to do it. Our government derives it's power from us. The consent of the governed.

Republicans and Libertarians are afraid of government so they want it limited. They want to try to pretend there is no government, want the smallest footprint possible. I don't think that is very realistic. I'm saying being afraid of something powerful is not the most logical approach. I'm saying the thing to do is harness that power and make it work for We, the People. US.

That’s just one place where we disagree. I oppose punishing the successful to reward the lesser successful! That’s not freedom or justice, it’s socialist authoritarianism!

Call it whatever you like. That is what we have to do. Progressive taxation does not punish success. It rewards it. Maintaining higher tax brackets for the super-wealthy does not cause them to fall in stature, relative to the rest of the income scale. High taxes never made a rich man poor. Even with those high brackets, the richest are still the richest. They still have more money than everybody else, and they still have their luxurious life. They are still very rich. Those who pay higher taxes are rewarded with the satisfaction of knowing that they are making America great by providing most of the revenue that allows us to have a large and fantastic government that maintains the best safety net in the world. We don't currently have that 'best safety net in the world,' but that is exactly what we need and we progressives will not rest until it is achieved. Time and demographics are on our side. Misinformation and hatred are on your side. The battle is on. And I am telling you: The richest cannot continue to bleed the rest drier and drier, with so many having so little after producing so much, forever. People are going to catch on. People are tired of big money pushing them around. Occupy Wall Street was a warning. That sentiment has not gone away.

Y’all lefties need to sell another scam! Y’all been taxing the rich for decades to pay for every phony socialist scam you can come up with! Some day you need to recognize and admit there just ain’t that many super rich folks and there ain’t that much money to pay for your vote purchasing scams

Total baloney. There is so much wealth out there in the hands of a relatively very few number of people that most people don't even understand how poor they are comparatively. Got a million bucks? That's nothing compared to these people. Pocket change.

Ya wanna know how wealth is REALLY distributed in the USA? If you did, you would have zero problem with redistributive taxation. Check this out:

 
Britain has had a National Health Service for 70 years. As the NHS is funded out of general taxation, not just income-based tax, the best way to look at the cost is as a percentage of GDP.

In 2017/18 the GDP was £2 trillion. Total NHS spending was £125 billion. So a little over 6% of GDP went on the health service.
NHS facilities are FREE AT THE POINT OF USE - free of charge and free of hassle.

There is also private medical expenditure of around £30 billion a year, funded mainly through insurance. Anyone who wishes to pay into a private insurance scheme is free to do so. The main benefits are access to a private hospital with a more luxurious level of accomodation, at a time of the patient's choice.

Nearly all medical consultants work primarily for NHS hospitals, but many also take private patients.


Added
There are other models than the NHS, of course. Almost every country in the developed world has a universal health service of some kind. There seem to be no ideological objections - except in one country.
 
Last edited:
In America, we have limits to the number of doctors that can be trained. We could use a lot more, but the docs and hospitals do not want competition. Artificial shortages are great ways to wield control and demand more money.
 
I don't hate. I do believe Constitutional violations are wrong and should be corrected. But there is great latitude in Constitutional interpretation. Something you call a violation may not be considered as such by another. The SCOTUS is the deciding authority.

Here friend we disagree again. I don’t find “great latitude” in the wording of the Constitution, I find literal English interpretations unambiguous in the vast majority of the Constitution, especially the Bill Of Rights, Articles One, Two and Three. I think most pre-teen youths of average intelligence could correctly interpret it. I also believe the leftist idiocy that the Constitution is a living breathing document is absurd! I think claiming it takes a constitutional scholar to interpret the Constitution is also absurd! I think what really is needed for interpretation in constitutional issues is the written law compiled by lawyers professional in the art of linguistic gymnastics who’s talents are for skirting the truest of Constitutional interpretations with mumbo jumbo meant to ambiguously confuse the positive Constitutional opinion.
 
The SCOTUS is the deciding authority.

The Supreme Court is made up of 9 black robed humans, with their own biases, appointed by partisan ideological Presidents and confirmed by partisan ideological Senators. Their every decision doesn’t PROVE the sanctity of constitutional and unconstitutional decisions. As a matter of fact some of their majority decisions are absurd and plainly biased. Though their decisions ARE the last word until, and if, later amended, their decisions aren’t “necessarily” constitutionally valid, they’re often simply a legalization of unconstitutional laws that can most often be easily recognized by the average interested citizen.
 
You seem predetermined to paint me with a certain brush and then disparage what it looks like. If you are aware that big money influence is the reason our government does not serve we the people as well as it should then the logical response to that is to try to find a way to eliminate the influence of big money on our government.

But of course we have an insolvable problem short of revolution for eliminating BIG money out of “your” most trusted government. That being the corrupt BIG money bought and paid for Duopoly two party dictatorship, because of the BIG corruption and BIG money in the election and reelection system incorporated in both parties your obscure vote is simply shoveling shit against a stone wall. Again, I’ll remind you the duopoly owns the national media, the national debate, the ballot access system and every dime of special interest loot. They, (the crooked bastards), have a collective lock on government. They hold the gavel that passes the legislation that determines how government works. It is absurdly naive to even waste a thought on any idea the those folks will legislate their perfect government racket away, don’t you think?
 
It is OUR government. It is just as much mine as it is yours. You can't call it mine just because I appreciate it more than you do. It is OURS.

But I take no responsibility for it! Because I don’t participate in their duopoly dictatorship racket, stacked deck. At 83 I’m on my way out of this world and I’m quickly finding a blessing in that thought. I have no faith in any world government. I accept the fact that humans have no credibility, loyalty or ability to govern themselves honestly, and with any real justice and freedom for any truly extended period of time. I can only see a bankrupted future for a once great America, poverty, elitism and tyrannical dictatorial government and a near future revolution. I think our founders great experiment is quickly ending!
 
Back
Top