So, you believe in the Christian God... Which is essentially a human with superpowers.
You mean organized religion! Not to be confused with a personal relationship with YHWH ,through the Holy SpiritBand religion? No way. Religion is already on the decline in the US and, I believe, as we become more educated it will continue to decrease.
It really doesn't matter. The only real difference between organized religion and what you practice is that you don't go to a separate building on Sundays.You mean organized religion! Not to be confused with a personal relationship with YHWH ,through the Holy Spirit
I was trained by the Holy Spirit not a "book"!It really doesn't matter. The only real difference between organized religion and what you practice is that you don't go to a separate building on Sundays.
Either way, the only evidence for your God is the same evidence that there is for Santa Claus and all of the Greek gods, which is to say a book written by men.
Nice try. I don't think you are fooling anyone. You are the scientifically illiterate one in this discussion.Again....you are showing your ignorance.
What a stupid thing to say. The sun obviously maintains all temperatures. Why am I the first person to teach you something so obvious?Our atmosphere is THE reason that temperatures are maintained
There is no such thing as the "life temperature band."in a range that allows for life to exist.
Nope. Stefan-Boltzmann determines RADIANCE, and that is a function solely of temperature, not of atmosphere or anything else.This happens because the atmosphere allows in X amount of energy and slows how quickly energy leaves the atmosphere.
Nope. All of this is likewise gibberish.Temps don't get too high or too low. This is enhanced on cloudy nights.
Nope. One preliminary requirement for Climate Change to be true is for there to exist an unambiguous definition of Climate Change that doesn't violate science, math or logic. You don't have that. Climate Change has therefore not been shown to be true.All that needs to happen for climate change to be true is for the atmosphere to slow, even further, the rate of energy leaving.
"The sun obviously maintains all temperatures"Nice try. I don't think you are fooling anyone. You are the scientifically illiterate one in this discussion.
What a stupid thing to say. The sun obviously maintains all temperatures. Why am I the first person to teach you something so obvious?
There is no such thing as the "life temperature band."
Nope. Stefan-Boltzmann determines RADIANCE, and that is a function solely of temperature, not of atmosphere or anything else.
By the way, to "how quickly" energy leaves earth ... it's "instantaneous."
Nope. All of this is likewise gibberish.
Nope. One preliminary requirement for Climate Change to be true is for there to exist an unambiguous definition of Climate Change that doesn't violate science, math or logic. You don't have that. Climate Change has therefore not been shown to be true.
No, you weren't. You were trained by your imagination.I was trained by the Holy Spirit not a "book"!
That will take awhile since Islam is the fastest growing religion and, like most religions, is predominant among the poor.Band religion? No way. Religion is already on the decline in the US and, I believe, as we become more educated it will continue to decrease.
To clarify, you STILL don't know what the "average global equilibrium temperature" means, right?"The sun obviously maintains all temperatures"
To clarify, you are saying that, without the atmosphere, the high and low temperatures on Earth would be identical to what they are now?
Wow! I never read the Bible ,but somehow "my imagination" was an expert on Passover! That I knew nothing about!No, you weren't. You were trained by your imagination.
I'm not talking about average. I'm talking about high and low.To clarify, you STILL don't know what the "average global equilibrium temperature" means, right?
I know. You pivoted. The high's and lows are irrelevant. The average global equilibrium temperature is all that matters. You have essentially tipped your king.I'm not talking about average. I'm talking about high and low.
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.Publishing has nothing to do with it. It's "odd" that I, a non-omniscient, non-all-powerful being, could write a better book of common sense than the book inspired by the creator of the universe.
Science isn't religion, Void.I don't believe, definitively, in climate change and never have. The question was whether or not there is reason to believe in climate change. A belief, based on the science, isn't a religion. It's the opposite of religion. Religion is based on fairytales and faith... "faith" is another way of saying you believe something on bad/no evidence.
Because your religion compels you to deny physics."All of your beliefs are based on violations of physics."
This is why I stopped discussing the topic with you and Into the Night.
Climate cannot change.IF you had any understanding of how climate change is believed to work, you wouldn't be making these claims.
Climate cannot change.Since you have no interest in understanding how climate change is believed to work, you continue to repeat falsehoods.
The Earth is a spheroid. Mantra 1a. Lame.It's the equivalent of me trying to have a scientific discussion about the earth with someone who believes the earth is flat and refuses to even look at the facts about the earth that shows it's not flat. You're basically doubling down on ignorance.
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.I'm not talking about average. I'm talking about high and low.
So.....
To clarify, you are saying that, without the atmosphere, the high and low temperatures on Earth would be identical to what they are now?
He's accurate.Nice try.
Climate is not work.Anyone who has an understanding of how climate is believed to work would not
You cannot create energy out of nothing, Void....could not....claim a violation of the first law of thermodynamics, yet you repeatedly made the claim.
Not possible. Now you are ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics.All that is needed for global temps to increase is for LESS energy to escape.
Higher temperatures mean additional energy, Void. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics again.There is no need for additional energy.
Climate cannot change.Again anyone who had a basic understanding of climate change would know that.
No gas or vapor has the capability to slow heat. Heat has no speed. You are also ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law again.Again....you are showing your ignorance. Our atmosphere is THE reason that temperatures are maintained in a range that allows for life to exist. This happens because the atmosphere allows in X amount of energy and slows how quickly energy leaves the atmosphere.
Argument from randU fallacy. Attempted proof by contrivance.Temps don't get too high or too low. This is enhanced on cloudy nights.
Climate cannot change.All that needs to happen for climate change to be true is for the atmosphere to slow, even further, the rate of energy leaving.
Religion is not illiteracy. Redefinition fallacy.Band religion? No way. Religion is already on the decline in the US and, I believe, as we become more educated it will continue to decrease.