The Covid Jab Jive: a gentle reminder

No worries, Taichi. You're free to use Facebook and Youtube for your medical advice.
God bless America! :thup:
Stop braying like an ass, you're smarter than that. Ignoring what I write to double down on a stupid personal shot that (as I detailed) doesn't make sense is what I expect from our local MAGA/Alt-Right/Christo-fascist flunkies. Do better.
 
Stop braying like an ass, you're smarter than that. Ignoring what I write to double down on a stupid personal shot that (as I detailed) doesn't make sense is what I expect from our local MAGA/Alt-Right/Christo-fascist flunkies. Do better.
You're free to spread fear about vaxxes, TC. All the MAGAts have been doing it for years now. :thup:

 
Here's a little tidbit from 2 years ago regarding just how objective and scientific all the pro-Covid vaccine mantra from the professionals and arm chair experts were regarding the public discussion:


www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1OxrSOsBfI

We got ours last week. It is a new type, akin to traditional vaccines using "killed" viruses, or rather, the proteins that make up their coatings. It is not the mRNA vaccine that first came out. It's efficacy is about the same as the mRNA type.
 
We got ours last week. It is a new type, akin to traditional vaccines using "killed" viruses, or rather, the proteins that make up their coatings. It is not the mRNA vaccine that first came out. It's efficacy is about the same as the mRNA type.
I got mine a week or so back too and saw the option but stuck with the Pfizer. My flu and RSV were a few weeks earlier.

 
I'm always fascinated how folk like you take this condescending stance because you are lucky enough (so far) hasn't been negatively affected by the jabs and boosters. Here's what you don't want to hear:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb2YMvfvm_M

Public health is not about individuals but about large numbers of people. There are always side effects with anything we introduce into the body, whether that's a vaccine, food, oral medication, etc. Patients and physicians must weigh the benefit-cost equation when considering whether a proposed med should be used, or not.
 
YOU got YOUR information from the same sources, son. Newspapers, magazines, radio programs, the net. And stop pretending that the link I used didn't source the who, what & where.

Here's the thing, when the worlds foremost authority stated contrary information to the CDC/Big pharma line, he suddenly is nearly dubbed a quack and given a smear job. Other bonafide researchers and scientist get the same treatment. So spare me the "ignore doctors" mantra, because that is merely a projection on your part.

My microbiology professor was one of the test subjects in 2020 for the Moderna vaccine. I trust his education, knowledge, and experience over that of Internet/popular media ppl with axes to grind.

My take on vaccines: If you don't believe in them, don't want one, are afraid of them -- fine, don't get any. But for the love of dog please don't try to dissuade others who want to protect their own health and that of others.
 
Public health is not about individuals but about large numbers of people. There are always side effects with anything we introduce into the body, whether that's a vaccine, food, oral medication, etc. Patients and physicians must weigh the benefit-cost equation when considering whether a proposed med should be used, or not.
A point the anti-vaxxers never bring up. Note that most anti-vaxxers are also anti-maskers and walk around coughing their germs upon everything within range. They don't care if a person is immuno-compromised, elderly or too young to have a vaccination.

The mRNA shots require babies to be 6 months or older. The Novavax has a minimum age of 12 years old....not that the anti-vaxxers give a fuck.

 
Public health is not about individuals but about large numbers of people. There are always side effects with anything we introduce into the body, whether that's a vaccine, food, oral medication, etc. Patients and physicians must weigh the benefit-cost equation when considering whether a proposed med should be used, or not.
That is no excuse for bad practices or suppression of better alternatives.
 
My microbiology professor was one of the test subjects in 2020 for the Moderna vaccine. I trust his education, knowledge, and experience over that of Internet/popular media ppl with axes to grind.

My take on vaccines: If you don't believe in them, don't want one, are afraid of them -- fine, don't get any. But for the love of dog please don't try to dissuade others who want to protect their own health and that of others.
Its not a question of belief but accumulating facts that the status would like to ignore.
 
We got ours last week. It is a new type, akin to traditional vaccines using "killed" viruses, or rather, the proteins that make up their coatings. It is not the mRNA vaccine that first came out. It's efficacy is about the same as the mRNA type.
Go with God, because it most likely did not go through usual 15 year test trials.
 
Tacky isn't being forced to take any shots.
Why is he obsessed with what others do?

During the height of the pandemic, sure....
if you took Tacky's position and didn't get your shots, you were essentially a social criminal.
I'd have had no problem with shooting them.

Now that new strains of Covid are just another type of bad cold for MOST PEOPLE (not all),
just do whatever the hell you want and let others do the same.

Me? I take the shots.
I'm older than my life expectancy anyway.
I'll chance the shot rather than be inconvenienced by Covid.
 
You're scared of facts that don't tell you what you want to hear. Maga mooks just display the broken clock syndrome.
That fact that I was 65 when the mRNA vaccines came out and the problems were with young men? Sure, TC, I was "scared". LOL

 
We got ours last week. It is a new type, akin to traditional vaccines using "killed" viruses, or rather, the proteins that make up their coatings. It is not the mRNA vaccine that first came out. It's efficacy is about the same as the mRNA type.
Like that ole' Drug Habit, eh?
 
Back
Top