Israel says jump then we ask how high...America became so corrupt and weak that the zionists took control of the Swamp. Remember that Epstein was a Mossad/CIA intel/blackmail operation.
The Gates of Hell have opened
- Thread starter goat
- Start date
Israel says jump then we ask how high...America became so corrupt and weak that the zionists took control of the Swamp. Remember that Epstein was a Mossad/CIA intel/blackmail operation.
I doubt the USA is to blame, but even more doubt that Israel is to blame.
Five days ago, Israel bombed Iran's embassy in Syria. These acts of war are condoned by the US.
Iran/Russia/China know that this is the failing American Empires aim, and are responsponding reasonably and rationally as they wait for the West to do its final collapse.
China Bloc out thinks and out performs America every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
All the signs of WW3 were there right in front of me but I kept thinking Russia/China/Iran would avoid the US trap. There's no more denying that WW3 is here.
I just did it.
I see claims that the current Hezbollah attack is a softening up operation to prepare for massive Iranian strikes on Israel...but I tend to doubt it...I expect a very limited Iranian strike with the US warned that if we get in it our bases in Syria and Iraq will be cancelled.
No matter how Iran responds, the US and israel got the regional war they wanted. The war machine is itching to try out their new weapons. There's no turning back now.
The last few years have shown that Western weapons tend to be not fit for purpose, and that the American military and civilian leadership are some mix of incompetent and Evil.
America needs to stop digging.
The israeli air force wants to make Lebanon look like Gaza. Then they'll take out electric, water and sewage in Iran. The region will not sit back this time and allow israel to go unpunished again. This is the drip drip drip of WW3.
We have never been closer....drink the best wines now.
timmyogoodwin
TimmyOGoodwin
The scenario depicted in this statement does not align well with the facts or history. It seems to blend speculative elements with interpretations of geopolitical dynamics. Reliable information from trusted sources should be consulted to obtain a clear and accurate understanding of the Middle East's current geopolitical climate and U.S. foreign policy before making such statements. Bottom line, incontrovertible irrefutable proof with pure fact must and should always accompany all such allegations.
I'm waiting on your concise Middle East geopolitical stance. I make it clear that I'm not here for cryptic mind games. Spit it out and tell us how WW3 benefits the failed US empire.
timmyogoodwin
TimmyOGoodwin
The Middle East has a deep and complex history. This region has seen many conflicts over time, often fueled by a mix of religious, territorial, and cultural disputes. These age-old conflicts have evolved through the centuries, influenced by the rise and fall of empires and the ongoing clash of ideologies.
The U.S. involvement in the Middle East has varied over the decades. Initially, the interest was primarily in oil and strategic alliances, but over time, the focus has shifted towards promoting stability and countering terrorism. The U.S. has sometimes been drawn into military actions, but these have often been controversial both at home and abroad.
Given the historical complexity and the entrenched nature of conflicts in the region, many, including myself, argue that the U.S. should prioritize a humanitarian role in the Middle East conflicts. By focusing on humanitarian aid and support for peaceful resolutions only, the U.S. can help address the immediate needs of the people affected by conflicts without becoming embroiled in the deeper ideological battles.
In this context, maintaining a vigilant but non-interventionist stance could be wise. Watching and being alert allows the U.S. to respond to crises without getting deeply involved in conflicts that have centuries-old roots and complex, often intractable ideological dimensions. This approach also respects the sovereignty of Middle Eastern countries and acknowledges the limits of outside influence in resolving deep-seated regional issues.
As to the WW3 equation. Overall, it is unlikely to benefit the U.S. or anyone for that matter, and most strategies should focus on prevention and peaceful resolution and not weaponizing regions or providing money to weaponize. There are circumstances where direct involvement may become necessary, but I won't even begin to pretend to know when that should or would be. There are far more professional minds better equipped to deal with such scenarios than my little ole pea brain. So, I hold a stand down and provide humanitarian aid only stance for the time being and WW3 does not even show up on my radar yet.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
I hate to tell you, goat, but you're no different from anybody else that has ever lived in this one respect.
Your mom's labia were the gates to your hell.
That's a response I expect from AI. I feel like I'm talking to a bot, Tim. How about we get US troops out of the Middle East before they end up dead. They're sitting ducks over there. israel will not survive the wrath they brought to themselves.
I've been to Boston so I know the street junkies have a better grasp on reality than you. I'm willing to bet you're from the Bronx.