Will the US end up in a war with Iran because of the genocide on Palestinians?
The Gates of Hell have opened
- Thread starter goat
- Start date
I don't think so.
The US borrows for war spending and subsidies. The necons have wanted war with Iran for a long time. Odds are it will lead to WW3 and put a lot more Americans into poverty.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win
Clueless Hamas supporter
Last edited:
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Your choice on banning me, CO/goat.
As for gaying up this thread, you were well on the way long before I showed up.
The OP:
Your third post:
Your fourth post:
^^^
This is so gay, it deserves an award.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Guno צְבִי;5904993 said:
Careful, guno. You'll be thread-banned for disagreeing with goat or by making him look bad....which he does fine all by himself.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Which NeoCon?
Try Google. Your stupidity is showing.
serendipity
Verified User
There was no mention of WTC-7 in NIST original report. Architects & Engineers forced NIST to explain the symmetries of WTC-7 at free fall speed, so NIST pulled some bullshit out of their ass. There are countless smoking guns on the crime of 911 but WTC-7 is the most obvious.
serendipity
Verified User
There was a series of articles drawn from the various NIST reports, including the one you mention, in the peer-reviewed journal Fire Technology Journal in 2012. They can be found at ResearchGate.
- Structural Response of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 to Impact and Fire Damage
- Structural Analysis of Impact Damage to World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7
- Analysis of Structural Response of WTC 7 to Fire and Sequential Failures Leading to Collapse
- Overview of the Structural Design of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 Buildings
serendipity
Verified User
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Conspiracy theorists have long claimed that explosives downed World Trade Center 7, north of the Twin Towers. The long-awaited report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conclusively rebuts those claims. Fire alone brought down the building, the report concludes, pointing to thermal expansion of key structural members as the culprit. The report also raises concerns that other large buildings might be more vulnerable to fire-induced structural failure than previously thought.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
Conspiracy theorists have long claimed that explosives downed World Trade Center 7, north of the Twin Towers. The long-awaited report from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conclusively rebuts those claims. Fire alone brought down the building, the report concludes, pointing to thermal expansion of key structural members as the culprit. The report also raises concerns that other large buildings might be more vulnerable to fire-induced structural failure than previously thought.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
People know controlled demolition when they see it. You have to remove every support column at the same time. That takes weeks or months of planning along with placing the explosives. Who had access to WTC-7 and the expertise to bring down 3 steel framed skyscrapers at free fall speed?
So, you don't actually know a single NeoCon who wants WW3?
This thread is here for a reason. It will show who knows what they're talking about and who watches msnbc.
NeoCons are a Republican movement. Are you claiming MSNBC is too Republican?
Neocons started with the Carter administration but jumped ship to Reagan when Carter refused to bomb Iran. Neocons have complete control over Biden and are preparing Americans for war with Iran by spreading fear through corporate media. You already fell for WMDs and mushroom clouds so neocons know you need their protection, so you continue to show your support for genocide.
Another name for NeoCons is Neo-Reaganites. It would be impossible for them to be new Reaganites before Reagan was President.
Reagan took a decidedly aggressive posture to the Cold War. It is impossible to know what Reagan would have done after the Cold War, because he was not mentally fit after the Cold War, but NeoCons think he would have continued to take an aggressive posture after the Cold War.
I was against their invasion of Iraq. I am also against their demands we bomb Iran, and their demands we get out of the treaty limiting Iran's nuclear development. trump agreed to withdrawing from the treaty, with the promise that he would do something better. What better? As with trump in general, it was vague and constantly changing. Sometimes he was going to bomb Iran into submission, and other times he was going to make a "really great deal" with Iran. Iran is not going to agree to a new deal, and I do not see bombing them as defeating them. In fact, bombing them might just save their government.