Every country has seen a savings after implementing national health care. Every statistic has shown the cost to be less per person in actual dollars and as a precentage of GDP. Furthermore, the vast majority of citizens support their respective plans. Of all government plans I can't think of any that garners such wide spread support in so many varied nations.
To begin with, Obamacare isn’t socialized medicine in the same traditions as other nations with socialized medicine and I repeat, there’s no constitutional authority for the federal government in America to operate any kind of healthcare program. Aside from that all I can say relative to the government saving money with Obamacare or any other type of federal government healthcare program is
”That will be the day!” History makes it perfectly clear our federal government has never created a program that wasn’t at least 10 times more costly than its initial projected cost and or the program makes a b-line toward bankruptcy.
As for Canadians crossing the border statistics show an equal or greater longevity in countries with a national health care policy. Countries that don't share a border with the US. Furthermore, the number of Canadians who do seek medical attention in the US is negligible.
Leftist talking points for sure. I’ve talked to folks from the UK who say the healthcare system there is expensive, the folks are highly taxed to support it, critical operations are often sent to India because there aren’t enough doctors or hospital facilities to handle the operations, the hospitals are poorly staffed and most are even filthy and in no way meet the standards of American healtrhcare and American hospitals.
As for the US being the world's policeman, as the old saying goes, charity begins at home. Protecting weaker countries may be noble and moral and the right thing to do but so is looking after the citizens here.
The citizens of America are guaranteed by our Constitution
equal opportunity not equal economy supported by the collective. I repeat “The powers not delegated to the United States, (federal government), nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” If you want government to
take care of the people, then you should support
STATE welfare programs and oppose the federal government’s violations of our Constitution or at least demand that an amendment be passed to our Constitution authorizing the federal government to create and finance its social programs and corporate subsidies, because they’re
unconstitutional.
We are not all equal! We’re not all equally beautiful, or equally smart, or equally ambitious or equally industrious or humorous. There’s no constitutional right or God given inalienable right to be anything equal about us except our right to
equal opportunity.
Lastly, warfare is becoming more efficient. It's like when McCain was arguing with Obama about fewer war ships. Of course there are fewer ships as there are more planes.
That wasn’t McCain, it was Romney. Efficiency is technology and technology is expensive . Every year we spend more on the Military Industrial Complex that Eisenhower warned us about and we ignored.
Drones will eliminate a large number of soldiers and I think that's excellent. If drones result in greater collateral damage maybe there will be less involvement in other countries unless it's an all out war. This idea of helping rebels here and there is a waste of money, military goods and US soldier's lives. Maybe people will start demanding it's "either you're in or you're out" rather than involvement all around the world.
No war was ever won from the air without boots on the ground. Only nuclear weapons have that capability and since we are not the sole owner thereof anymore, nobody can
win a nuclear war.
Choices will have to be made and the choice made in countries with a national health car plan is maintain the plan and cut elsewhere and that is/was the purpose of ObamaCare. It is a law.
Its
unconstitutional law the proof thereof is in the Constitution irrespective of what the partisan ideologues on the Court have said.
It is now an obligation of government. The common sense thing to do now is to make it a true one payer system. It takes time as people have invested/set up businesses in medical offices and equipment maunfacturing, etc. so that has to be taken into consideration but a clear directive given that the government is headed towards such a system needs to be established. In other words don't invest in the medical field if your intention is to get rich quick. It ain't gonna happen. Don't expect to work for a health care provider and fly on private jets. Those jobs are going to disappear.
Disappear right along with the doctors and credible hospitals which we’re already short on and Obamacare provides no financial incentive for anybody to become a doctor or establish a hospital. The major incentive of Obamacare is opportunity for insurance companies to rip off the government even more than it already does. When government can mandate insurance, insurance company profits skyrocket and the CEO thereof make billions and fly private jets regularly even on lavish vacations.