Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
once again here is the video zappa claims i plagerized....
mind you, i've never seen it
what a pathetic liar zappa....unlike you, i am not afraid to link to the video, despite never seeing it
The Official Debate Championship Shit Talking Thread!
- Thread starter BRUTALITOPS
- Start date
once again here is the video zappa claims i plagerized....
mind you, i've never seen it
what a pathetic liar zappa....unlike you, i am not afraid to link to the video, despite never seeing it
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Great Debate Guys! Stuff like this is what's going to make this competition a success!!Thanks.
I would of liked to have seen the sides reversed, just to see what would have been presented.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Yurt's not debating USF either but that hasn't stopped him from pissing and moaning about USF's debate.
I predict Bender and I will have a well reasoned debate...regardless of any wailing and gnashing of teeth Yurtsicle may do.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
if you plagerize like USF...expect to be called on your dishonesty
its funny how you're ignoring watermark's thread on it and acting as if i'm the only one....
oh yeah, thats because you're a lying POS
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
see...this is why you get no respect from me
on the one hand, you actually AGREE that plagerism is wrong and that watermark and i have a point....YET....you hack it up with your libby buddies in order to look cool in their eyes....
you have no integrity
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
The winner is southern man.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
OMG...Yurtsie's getting ready to Spurtsie!!
You unbelievable tool, it says right on my wall what I do for a living...you always do such "thorough" research before a case? I weep for your clients.
You really are a gigantic douche.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Great Debate Guys! Stuff like this is what's going to make this competition a success!!
I would much rather play the "Devil's Advocate", since I allready have the information that supports what I believe; this gives me the chance to look at more information and might just give me pause to re-think my position.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You had the more difficult side, no doubt. I don't know how I would have presented it.Thanks.
I would of liked to have seen the sides reversed, just to see what would have been presented.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
oh, you cock suck for a living....
i created a thread with a link to the video you claim i plagerized....prove it or recant
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
do we get to see the scoresheet on why sm won?
zappasguitar
Well-known member
So the whiny little girl who couldn't even be bothered to check my wall as part of his "research" to discover what I do for a living before calling me a coward wants to lecture others on "integrity"?
Ha Ha...it is to laugh...
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Stop being such a pussy. You claimed that there were regulations the The Obama couldn't waive, and you simply failed to prove that.No, I didn't make an assertion. You did and you failed to prove your assertion. I requested you to provide the regulatory references and you completely failed to do so. When you requested that of me, I did so easily. Game set, match, You can move the goal post all you want. You still lost! na, na, na, na na!
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i would never check a pervert's wall....
btw....i notice you've backed off your claim of plagerism and have now deflected about other bullshit....
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?t=27872
go there and prove it or recant
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
OK, there debate is over and now I can speak more fully.
SM clearly won the opening statement. He articulated a clear point of view, defended it well with clearly sited references. His opening statement was extremely well written.
But he made a big mistake in his logic in correlating the definition he used for mentall illness with homosexuality being a mental illness and USF nailed him on it in his rebuttal.
USF completely undermined SM's position when he stated that SM's definition and logic would also mean that those who have sex but are unable to procreate would be mentally ill or those who can procreate but chose not to and have sex would be mentally ill. OUCH!!!
Can you really seriously consider that those people would be mentally ill but how could they then not be as the very same definition and logic SM used would also apply to them?
You could also say, using SM's logic, that any hetero couple who has anal sex is mentally ill. It has nothing to do with reproduction and would not be "normal" by SM's definition. Do you really think that hetero couples who have anal sex are mentally ill? If the answer is no, then why would gay men be any different? You could also make the same argument about oral sex or masturbation, that anyone who paraticipated in these are mentally ill, and just like homosexuality, that too has been claimed in the past.
SM made the same mistake here that Skidmark made in his opening statement and USF's comment right there was a crushing rebuttal to SM's argument.
I also give the question/answer portion to USF. SM didn't even ask a question about the topic. He attacked USF's research on the topic, that's pretty close to an ad hom and from a debate standpoint is not only irrelevent but poor form, to make matters worse, he didn't actually answer USF's question.
On the other side, USF asked a tough question, for which he really didn't get a direct answer from his opponent. In addition USF responded directly to SM's question and used that as a sprngboard to further his attack on SM's postion. His answer to SM's question was definately USF's best post.
On that basis I score it a win for USF 2 pts to 1.
Last edited:
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I was looking at this the same way, especially with SM's response to my question, and was surprised by the Judge's outcome; but that's the way it goes.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Oh quit being obtuse, you can't defend your point because you don't know what your talking about and I proved it. Take it like a man son.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Can't even admit you were wrong about something as minuscule as that...speaks VOLUMES about you as a person.
Way to do that research...You EVER won a case yet?