The Rich vs. Poor Pay Gap In America; When will the people say "enough is enough"..

The rich are a problem when they use their influence and power to rig the system in their favor, to the detriment of the lives of others.

Once again; this is a fiction of your own warped and distorted imagination. I am sure you will make the same incoherent arguments for Bill Gates and his Foundation that gives Billions towards reducing poverty and ignorance; perhaps you should apply for a grant, lord knows you define ignorance.

But because you are a clueless Marxist asshat, let me explain to you how the rich got the way they did for the most part; they had an idea which they were convinced was a better product or service. They worked tireless long hours perfecting that product or service, many times lacking sufficient funding or capital and coming close to bankruptcy on numerous occasions while ignoring close associates and family who continually told them they should give up. But with persistence, effort and long hours of devotion and about ten years, most achieved incredible wealth.

That is the difference between a loser class that gullibly falls for Marxist class envy rhetoric, and those who succeed. Gullible Marxists think that success can be achieved by making everyone equally miserable and that they should be the deciders. Successful wealthy individuals got their through hard work, long hours, sacrifices and persistence.

Now after they achieve such wealth, these same people see it as their duty to mankind to give back by becoming philanthropists and setting up huge charitable trusts for worthy causes; a much more effective method than massive Government efforts where most of the money is pissed away in administration and corruption.

If you spent half as much time studying successful entrepreneurs as you do parroting idiot Marxist talking points, perhaps you too could do better than minimum wage.

Dimwit.
 
Once again; this is a fiction of your own warped and distorted imagination. I am sure you will make the same incoherent arguments for Bill Gates and his Foundation that gives Billions towards reducing poverty and ignorance; perhaps you should apply for a grant, lord knows you define ignorance.

But because you are a clueless Marxist asshat, let me explain to you how the rich got the way they did for the most part; they had an idea which they were convinced was a better product or service. They worked tireless long hours perfecting that product or service, many times lacking sufficient funding or capital and coming close to bankruptcy on numerous occasions while ignoring close associates and family who continually told them they should give up. But with persistence, effort and long hours of devotion and about ten years, most achieved incredible wealth.

That is the difference between a loser class that gullibly falls for Marxist class envy rhetoric, and those who succeed. Gullible Marxists think that success can be achieved by making everyone equally miserable and that they should be the deciders. Successful wealthy individuals got their through hard work, long hours, sacrifices and persistence.

Now after they achieve such wealth, these same people see it as their duty to mankind to give back by becoming philanthropists and setting up huge charitable trusts for worthy causes; a much more effective method than massive Government efforts where most of the money is pissed away in administration and corruption.

If you spent half as much time studying successful entrepreneurs as you do parroting idiot Marxist talking points, perhaps you too could do better than minimum wage.

Dimwit.

Your pollyanna notions about the virtues of the rich and powerful are laughable. It proves you know nothing about the world.
 
Once again, and because you are an incredible buffoon who cannot read and comprehend the Liberal blogs you desperately think support your laughably dense version of history; from your own link:

Still, since we are forced to speculate, there is evidence of how the Founders, and the society they created, viewed these legal entities.

It says "SPECULATE" dipshit...I don't buy into speculation, I go for reality, the truth and the facts. Now run off and play in the sandbox with the kinder gardners; you're incapable of coherent debate.

Dimwit.

Again, what the founders really feared was an all powerful Government and politicians being elected by uneducated dullards like you.

Read and become informed dimwit:

The design of the government under the Constitution was not haphazard. Our Founding Fathers understood that governments can oppress people. They knew it from their own experience—and they knew it from their extensive scrutiny of governmental forms throughout history. Concentrated power was more than dangerous … it was life threatening.

That’s why:

1.They balanced power between the three branches.
2.They gave each branch robust checks on the other two.
3.They gave the national government only enumerated powers, and retained all other power in the hands of either the people or the states.
4.They used the states to check the national government.
5.The members of each branch were chosen by a different method.
6.The term of office varied by government position.
7.An impeachment process was defined for extreme cases.

Concentrated political power frightened the Founders. They believed that only by limiting government could liberty survive the natural tendency of man to dictate the habits of other men. The balanced separation of power with checks was designed to prevent tyranny. Each branch was given delineated powers, and then each of these powers was limited and checked by another branch or entity. The system was purposely designed to slow governmental actions enough to allow due deliberation. This frustrates those who want the government to always “do something” about every problem, but it also hampers the government from doing something grievous that affects our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.


I understand your desperate attempts to prove what an ignorant asshat you are, but even the dimmest wit would know when to give it a rest.

Seriously, you have proven that you are unwilling to even research a subject you are wrong about and rather try to disprove it by introducing a co-existing situation as if it disproves my position.
Your ignorance of your own country's history is embarrassing enough.

You are a perfect example of why we are fucked. Even supposedly educated conservatards deny the most basic reality.
 
“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. ”


― Thomas Jefferson

This quote does not support the moronic claims that "the founders had a healthy fear of corporate power” or that we fought the revolution over corporations, nor negates my argument that the founders greatest fear was concentrated political power.

Now what you probably also do not comprehend is that my arguments do not suggest that we should have complete and total monopolistic corporate power either; but you’re a dullard who can’t comprehend complex arguments beyond Marxist talking points.

Another epic fail by the asshat. At least your forum name is appropriate; too bad you do not comprehend how true it is in your case.
 
Seriously, you have proven that you are unwilling to even research a subject you are wrong about and rather try to disprove it by introducing a co-existing situation as if it disproves my position.
Your ignorance of your own country's history is embarrassing enough.

You are a perfect example of why we are fucked. Even supposedly educated conservatards deny the most basic reality.

Seriously, you have proven that you are unwilling to even research a subject you are wrong about and rather try to disprove it by introducing a co-existing situation as if it disproves my position.

Your ignorance of your own country's history is embarrassing enough.

You are a perfect example of why we are fucked. Even supposedly educated lefttards deny the most basic reality.

Get a mirror dimwit. Your glaring ignorance stares back at you.
 
Seriously, you have proven that you are unwilling to even research a subject you are wrong about and rather try to disprove it by introducing a co-existing situation as if it disproves my position.

Your ignorance of your own country's history is embarrassing enough.

You are a perfect example of why we are fucked. Even supposedly educated lefttards deny the most basic reality.

Get a mirror dimwit. Your glaring ignorance stares back at you.

Talk about originality. :palm:
 
Talk about originality. :palm:

I was just reflecting your glaring ignorance back at you. Apparently it is having little effect because you seem compelled to continually remove all doubt of what a brain dead dullard you really are.

Perhaps there is so little grey matter between your ears you are prevented from comprehending even the obvious?

Dimwit.
 
This quote does not support the moronic claims that "the founders had a healthy fear of corporate power” or that we fought the revolution over corporations, nor negates my argument that the founders greatest fear was concentrated political power.

Now what you probably also do not comprehend is that my arguments do not suggest that we should have complete and total monopolistic corporate power either; but you’re a dullard who can’t comprehend complex arguments beyond Marxist talking points.

Another epic fail by the asshat. At least your forum name is appropriate; too bad you do not comprehend how true it is in your case.

read it again, focus on this part " the banks AND CORPORATIONS that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. ”
 
read it again, focus on this part " the banks AND CORPORATIONS that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. ”

There is no getting through to this one Asshat.
 
read it again, focus on this part " the banks AND CORPORATIONS that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. ”

Read my lips; it is a false claim that has no basis in reality or the facts. Please provide an example of a Corporation depriving people of their property you twit.
 
There is no getting through to this one Asshat.

Translation; "I am being exposed as an incredibly dense moron so I better quit while I'm behind."

Dismissed dipshit. Get some books, read, comprehend and get back to me when you grow a brain.

Moron.
 
1. Show where I said I had a problem.

So, now you have no problem with corporate profits, right Goober?
2. The list is too long for the amount of storage available at this forum. Corporate stooge.

In other words again you have no rational argument so you’re posting a fucking cop-out, right Goober? BIG fucking government stooge!
 
So, now you have no problem with corporate profits, right Goober?


In other words again you have no rational argument so you’re posting a fucking cop-out, right Goober? BIG fucking government stooge!
Do some research smuck.
Start with the East India Company in all it's national permutations,
continue on to the Stamp Act, The Boston Tea Party and the House of Rothschild (Mayer Amsel and his five sons in particular.
Get back to me when you are smarter than Truth Deflector which should take about 10 minutes.
 
Do some research smuck.
Start with the East India Company in all it's national permutations,
continue on to the Stamp Act, The Boston Tea Party and the House of Rothschild (Mayer Amsel and his five sons in particular.
Get back to me when you are smarter than Truth Deflector which should take about 10 minutes.

How about maybe you study up on how BIG corporations manage to ally themselves with BIG fucking governments and how easy they manage to find it to bribe the government’s bastards. Maybe then you will lose some of the stars in your eyes for BIG-ASSED fucking government, huh Goober? BTW, its so, so easy to prove that its equally easy to bribe members of either membership of the fucking duopoly.
 
How about maybe you study up on how BIG corporations manage to ally themselves with BIG fucking governments and how easy they manage to find it to bribe the government’s bastards. Maybe then you will lose some of the stars in your eyes for BIG-ASSED fucking government, huh Goober? BTW, its so, so easy to prove that its equally easy to bribe members of either membership of the fucking duopoly.

maybe you'll manage to see that the bribers are just as culpable as those taking the bribes.

And what if politicians can't be bought? They get wacked. It's their silver or their lead.
 
How about maybe you study up on how BIG corporations manage to ally themselves with BIG fucking governments and how easy they manage to find it to bribe the government’s bastards. Maybe then you will lose some of the stars in your eyes for BIG-ASSED fucking government, huh Goober? BTW, its so, so easy to prove that its equally easy to bribe members of either membership of the fucking duopoly.

OK did I indicate anything to the contrary?
'
The only thing you are terminally wrong about is that CU is a good thing. It is an outrage which enables the exact system you describe to operate with even greater secrecy.

Where do you get the dimwitted notion that I am in favor of big government, retard?
 
OK did I indicate anything to the contrary?
'
The only thing you are terminally wrong about is that CU is a good thing. It is an outrage which enables the exact system you describe to operate with even greater secrecy.

Not hardly. What allows the bribery system to operate is the willfully uninformed voting Goobers who’s only interest is in their own share of the fucking bribery or their being bewitched by and loyal to a fucking political party.

Where do you get the dimwitted notion that I am in favor of big government, retard?

Your opposition to the ”CORRECT” Citizens United decision and your favoritism for the unconstitutional McCain/Feingold 1st Amendment violation which should have been named “Incumbent Politicians Job Security Insurance Policy.”

The only legal and constitutional way to eliminate special interest money from politics is for an informed public of voters to make it irrelevant with informed voting or by a constitutional amendment.
 
Not hardly. What allows the bribery system to operate is the willfully uninformed voting Goobers who’s only interest is in their own share of the fucking bribery or their being bewitched by and loyal to a fucking political party.



Your opposition to the ”CORRECT” Citizens United decision and your favoritism for the unconstitutional McCain/Feingold 1st Amendment violation which should have been named “Incumbent Politicians Job Security Insurance Policy.”

The only legal and constitutional way to eliminate special interest money from politics is for an informed public of voters to make it irrelevant with informed voting or by a constitutional amendment.

Show where I supported the McCain/Feingold 1st Amendment violation idiot.

You may also want to participate in this thread, where I soundly disproved the legitimacy of CU; http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?41700-Defend-Citizens-United
 
Last edited:
Have you ever heard of a foreclosure or a repossession?

So you believe that banks should not be entitled to the asset used to secure the loan if the payor no longer pays? Are you really THAT stupid?

What the fuck do you think a contract is? Toilet paper?

You take moron to epic levels here dimwit. You’re beyond merely stupid. I feel like I am talking to a three year old with no clue about the real world.
 
Back
Top