While I certainly agree that there are far bigger issues to worry about, my problem with the above is this....
IF Chavez is controlling the media... just how much do you think we will know about what is going on? That is why the suppression of the media is a big warning sign. Again, it does not mean that he will set himself up as a dictator... just that it is a big first step along the path.
The chavez hatred started way before he denied the television station a liscence renewel, and way before there was any talk of amending their constitution.
It started even before the Iraq war. the Bush admin supported the 2002 coup against Chavez. I don't think that is in much doubt. Why? Becasue Chavez was renogtiating oil contracts, to take away some of the interest of foreign oil investors. He's never said he's going to kick out foreign investors, or completely nationalize all the oil.
So really, the hatred was against him for economic reasons. The fact that foreign investors were going to lose part of their stake in venezuelan resources. That seems like a trivial reason to hate for you or me, but not for George Bush and corporate america.
It was exactly at this time, that Fox News and the WSJ started ginning up the hatred of Chavez (who, conicidentally got along pretty well with bill clinton). Dittoheads, like some we see on this board, took the bait from Fox News and ran with it. Never knowing a thing about venezuelan history, or that previous governments were as bad - or actually worse - than chavez on human rights
Link me to a post where I said anything of the sort!Neither you nor SF know what you're talking about on this issue, and I'm not going to discuss it with either one of you anymore, it's fruitless. But I don't want to hear any talk about "I hate Chavez, he's a socialist" and "free markets" because it sickens me, sickens me, sickens me.
Disgusting.
umm why are we not so outraged about Pakistan ?
Or the human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia ?
umm why are we not so outraged about Pakistan ?
Or the human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia ?
Hence the "victims of the cold war" in my post. I pointed out exactly how our foreign policy directly effected them, but also pointed out that their own government's reaction was also responsible for the state of affairs that caused the riots in 1989 that opened the way for the attempted coup in 1992, which pushed Chavez into the spotlight and made his eventual election in 1998 possible.all their ailments were not because of the USA Damo, but we contributed greatly.
Just continue to swing far to the other side and ignore all that is in the middle Damo.
It is that conservative brain thing, you can't help it.
Go back to cutting or clearing the brush already..or suffer the end result!
Today, 01:56 PM
Remove user from ignore listCypress
This message is hidden because Cypress is on your ignore list.
Seriously Damo... this is a such a nice feature. Not having to be bothered with the resident idiot.... priceless.
those countries are bush buddies.
If you could just admit that your Chavez-hatred goes back years, and is related to the fact that he bashed bush over the Iraq war, and over his leftist reforms of the venezuelan economy (which really isn't your business, since its not your country), we could finish up here.
Please don't pretend that venezulan press freedoms played any role in your chavez hatred, since your hatred predates by years the issue regarding the press.
Which person here said we should do anything to VZ or their leadership?Me defending Chavez, not especially. Just defending VZ's right to run their own country without interference from the good ol US of A.
Which person here said we should do anything to VZ or their leadership?
Certain events are certainly fact. But you seem to blame the US for the majority of problems that occured. Others do not share that viewpoint. While the US certainly has a responsibility in many cases, it is not the great evil you are appearing to portray it as. Your viewpoint seems to be coming directly from Chavez himself.
Right and Pakistan is harboring the OBL bunch it appears. But we have not invaded them yet....
We invaded 2 other countries over 911, and want to bomb another one that had nothing to do with it (Iran), so why not invade Pakistan ? Or even Saudi Arabia which is where most of the 911 terrorists came from....
but then I suppose that would be logical and not emotional enough...
Back to that false outrage thing I guess....
Which person here said we should do anything to VZ or their leadership?
It was a force of great evil before WWII and then from Truman on. As soon as Rooselvelt died, the US was a force for evil again there. That is the truth.