THE TARA READE CHARGES AGAINST JOE BIDEN.

Let me see if I understand the phony Consevative's stand on this issue:
Biden's accuser must be telling the truth, while Kavanaugh's accuser and tRump's MULTIPLE accusers ALL have to be lying. LMAO

Once again you got it all wrong you triggered loon; The PHONY left demanded that we believe Kavanaugh's accuser but now claim that Joe's is lying. You should see someone about that serious case of stupid and hypocrite you wallow in. ;)
 
Here is the problem when you have a demented mentality and severe derangement issue like "Nontruth Demented" has: Clinton agreed to testify and perjured himself. tRump refused to testify. As such, his single digit IQ processes tRUMP as being innocent.

You pathetic, triggered loon; Clinton actually banged in intern in the White House, lied about it and obstructed the investigation. The FIFTH Amendment; READ it. Trump isn't compelled to answer anything the triggered assholes in the Party of the Jackass demand.

Trump hadn't committed an crimes and he certainly doesn't lack the judgement Clinton did to be banging White House interns. Who does that??? Who defends that crap??? Morons like you. :rolleyes:

Now go see someone about that mental retardation. ;)
 
There weren't any accusations; they were all proven facts. Remember, Clinton wasn't impeached for banging an intern in the White House, which in itself is very poor judgement, but for obstructing the investigation and lying under oath which he admitted to.

So are you saying it's an established fact that Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick? What evidence is there, other than her word?

What criteria do you rely on to decide who's lying and who's telling the truth?
 
So are you saying it's an established fact that Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick? What evidence is there, other than her word?

Where in any of my posts did I mention Broaddrick? Are you now saying that Broaddrick is lying? Is she a bimbo, as Hillary liked to call all her husbands victims? Is Norma Rogers a liar too? How about Susan Lewis; Louis Ma; and Jean Darden? Are they all liars too?

What criteria do you rely on to decide who's lying and who's telling the truth?

That's not for me to decide or you. So let's try to get you back on topic; this is about the glaring hypocrisy on the left and their double standards. This is about demanding Ford be believed, yet now, when the shoe is on the other foot and it is THEIR guy, saying Tara Reade is a liar.

Run along; I don't like wallowing in the circle of stupidity with someone who can't stay on topic and would rather flail and deflect.
 
Where in any of my posts did I mention Broaddrick?

I asked, "Did you believe any of the accusations against Bill Clinton?" You responded, "There weren't any accusations; they were all proven facts." This strongly implies that you believe all Clinton accusers, including Broaddrick. So do you believe her?

Are you now saying that Broaddrick is lying? Is she a bimbo, as Hillary liked to call all her husbands victims? Is Norma Rogers a liar too? How about Susan Lewis; Louis Ma; and Jean Darden? Are they all liars too?

On the contrary, I find it completely believable that Bill Clinton raped Broaddrick, and sexually harassed a multitude of other women.

That's not for me to decide or you.

Interesting. You said you don't believe Reade or Ford, so you must use some kind of criteria to determine who's lying and who's telling the truth. Now you're saying it's not for us to decide. Which is it?

So let's try to get you back on topic; this is about the glaring hypocrisy on the left and their double standards.

That's not actually the topic at all. The original post was about Tara Reade's story, and has become a discussion about accusers in general. It seems like you're looking for a quick exit from this conversation. Why?
 
I asked, "Did you believe any of the accusations against Bill Clinton?" You responded, "There weren't any accusations; they were all proven facts." This strongly implies that you believe all Clinton accusers, including Broaddrick. So do you believe her?



On the contrary, I find it completely believable that Bill Clinton raped Broaddrick, and sexually harassed a multitude of other women.



Interesting. You said you don't believe Reade or Ford, so you must use some kind of criteria to determine who's lying and who's telling the truth. Now you're saying it's not for us to decide. Which is it?



That's not actually the topic at all. The original post was about Tara Reade's story, and has become a discussion about accusers in general. It seems like you're looking for a quick exit from this conversation. Why?

maybe he's tired of talking to a moron.
 

I don't see how my questions were stupid or unfair. I've been relatively civil the whole time; I never called you names or accused you of being a hypocrite. On the contrary, I offered you an opportunity to clear up what some would view as an inconsistency (believing all of Clinton's accusers, but not believing Ford or Reade). That you choose to insult me instead of answering some very straightforward questions is puzzling.
 
I don't see how my questions were stupid or unfair. I've been relatively civil the whole time; I never called you names or accused you of being a hypocrite. On the contrary, I offered you an opportunity to clear up what some would view as an inconsistency (believing all of Clinton's accusers, but not believing Ford or Reade). That you choose to insult me instead of answering some very straightforward questions is puzzling.

AssHat (who started the issue of which you are speaking here)...is just doing what the scorpion did in the scorpion and the frog fable.

He is a nasty jerk...doing what nasty jerks do. If it surprises you, you should be aware of what the frog forgot. It is his nature! You should know what he is.
 
I don't see how my questions were stupid or unfair. I've been relatively civil the whole time; I never called you names or accused you of being a hypocrite. On the contrary, I offered you an opportunity to clear up what some would view as an inconsistency (believing all of Clinton's accusers, but not believing Ford or Reade). That you choose to insult me instead of answering some very straightforward questions is puzzling.

You got to be new to this forum "Joe," "anything but the truth's" schtick is personal insults, that and corny copy and pastes, he attempts to employ them to cover up his lack of content, but to put it in perspective, the insults are like the towel hitting the canvas, he's done, best to just record "next" and move on, he'll have nothing further to deliver on the topic

However, as I always say, he is entertaining, been known to deliver instant classics
 
AssHat (who started the issue of which you are speaking here)...is just doing what the scorpion did in the scorpion and the frog fable.

He is a nasty jerk...doing what nasty jerks do. If it surprises you, you should be aware of what the frog forgot. It is his nature! You should know what he is.

you're such a dog-faced pony soldier.
 
I agree that it would be out of character for Biden; I have long supported him specifically because I believe he's a decent man capable of great compassion and empathy. The idea of him being a rapist is inconceivable to me. That being said, the call to Larry King in August 1993 shows that something happened to Reade, and that it was serious enough to consider bringing to the press. We now also have a former neighbor of Reade backing up the story. What am I supposed to make of these facts?

Here's the clip from that Larry King show. How do we know this was about Biden? How do we know this really was Tara Reade's mom?

 
Back
Top