so?
Trump found guilty then not guilty!
- Thread starter T. A. Gardner
- Start date
Diogenes
It's my prerogative
And, so?
Tobytone
Verified User
LOL Wow, that's the hardest I've ever seen a Libtard drone work. You deserve at least a round of applause. 
I've been having a blast at your expense; it's like a hobby at this point. I've spelled it out so clearly even a toddler could get it.
I noticed, amidst all your ranting, you conveniently forgot to mention the "damning evidence" that supposedly convinced that jury of Libtard drones to find Trump guilty. Of course, I knew you wouldn't, because first, you haven't bothered to sift through the evidence like I have, and second, there's no such thing as "damning evidence" because it simply doesn't exist.
Who's the absolute idiot here that doesn't get that the appeal process (which, by the way, everyone has a right to, including Trump) would clash with his all-important job? This makes it a federal issue, to say the least. I suppose we'll just have to let time play this one out. lol.
Oh, and Trump's case is a textbook example of LAWFARE, apparently the concept is too complex for a Libtard drone to wrap their head around.
Regardless, reality will unfold whether or not the whining, crying, ungrateful, immature, sexually confused, racist, and incompetent drones choose to participate. I guess you'll just have to keep your eyes on the news.
I've been having a blast at your expense; it's like a hobby at this point. I've spelled it out so clearly even a toddler could get it.I noticed, amidst all your ranting, you conveniently forgot to mention the "damning evidence" that supposedly convinced that jury of Libtard drones to find Trump guilty. Of course, I knew you wouldn't, because first, you haven't bothered to sift through the evidence like I have, and second, there's no such thing as "damning evidence" because it simply doesn't exist.
Who's the absolute idiot here that doesn't get that the appeal process (which, by the way, everyone has a right to, including Trump) would clash with his all-important job? This makes it a federal issue, to say the least. I suppose we'll just have to let time play this one out. lol.
Oh, and Trump's case is a textbook example of LAWFARE, apparently the concept is too complex for a Libtard drone to wrap their head around.
Regardless, reality will unfold whether or not the whining, crying, ungrateful, immature, sexually confused, racist, and incompetent drones choose to participate. I guess you'll just have to keep your eyes on the news.
Tobytone
Verified User
Talk about repetitive. LOL 'you're a sock' good comeback. I guess it's better than most that come from libtard drones, so there's that. You're definitely triggered. lol Probably should stay away from hair clippers, we know how that story ends.
And?
Daylight63
Verified User
You've made America into an ASSylum.
Diogenes
It's my prerogative
Have I? Are you grateful for my ostensible provision of a place suitably tailored for you?
Tobytone
Verified User
HAHAHAAHA Wow, you guys really schooled me. You're so pathetic that you have to steal my lovingly chosen terms for losers like you. ROFL No originality, just SAD. Although, It's very flattering, in a pathetic way. You find my descriptions so spot-on that it sends you into a tailspin.As Richard and I explained to you during your embarrassing ass beating, literally everything you wrote is wrong. You could be lying. You could just be parroting the garbage that a good drone like you immerses yourself in from the KKKonservative media. Either way, you're a worthless moron. I hope you notice how I constructed this post.
I've already told you to steer clear of the hair clippers, but let's add something your parents are probably too scared to say: Don’t break their stuff when you read this and have your little tantrums. You didn't pay for it, you're lucky they support your sorry ass, and despite their passivity, you shouldn't abuse their kindness by taking your anger out on things that aren't yours. LOL, deep down, you know I'm right.
School me more please.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
They just didn't take the case. That isn't "ruling against him."
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Those would be separate crimes. Again, this is using the fallacy of the undistributed middle. The crime charged for fraudulent bookkeeping is normally--and up to Trump's case always--been charged as a single felony based on commission and conviction of an underlying felony. A typical case might be, you are running a business and defrauding customers and cooking the books to cover up the fraud. You get hit with two felonies, not two hundred.
What Bragg did was, one assume without proof or merit that Trump had committed some underlying felony that was never established or enumerated and then charged Trump for each count of bookkeeping separately in what amounted to charge stacking.
I guess that is why you get it. Because you are a toddler.LOL Wow, that's the hardest I've ever seen a Libtard drone work. You deserve at least a round of applause.
Since you claimed you sifted through all the evidence what day did Cohen testify that he met Trump at the WH?
What did Cohen testify to about the services provided under the "retainer agreement?"
That testimony was not in the exhibits introduced. The exhibits were to show Cohen actually did meet with Trump.
Why does the appeal process interfere with Trump's job? Is Trump writing the briefs? Trump will take less time meeting with his lawyers on the appeal in the next year than he will golfing in the next month. Where someone works doesn't make the appeal a federal issue. Is Trump appealing his election to the Presidency? No. He is appealing his conviction in a state court for a state crime. That means there has to be a Constitutional issue related to the conviction for there to be a federal appeal.
Can you provide us with the name of that textbook. Do you even know what a textbook is?
The only one here being a whining, crying .... incompetent drone is you. You know absolutely nothing about the case and you certainly didn't examine all the exhibits
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Then why are you still living in America?
So if Trump wrote a false check on Oct 10 and then wrote a false check on Nov 10 those would both be separate crimes, would they not?
You are wrong on there needing to be a conviction of an underlying felony. Why are you repeating that false claim after I cited at least 5 other instances someone was convicted for falsifying business records and there was no other conviction on another felony?
Renee Houghtaling convicted on one count of falsifying business records and acquitted on 71 other counts.
And here you are misrepresenting the law again. There is ample court record to show that there is no need to have committed some underlying felony since the law only requires intent to commit or intent to conceal another crime.
McCumiskey convicted of more than one count of falsifying business records and the appeals court said
The jury could therefore convict defendant of falsifying business records if the jury concluded that defendant had the intent to commit or conceal another crime, even if he was not convicted of the other crime.
Diesel
Verified User
I guess. He's a pretty worthless troll if you ask me.
Diesel
Verified User
Wow. You are triggered. It took exactly 3 weeks to lose your fucking mind and prove yourself a damn fool. Go create another sock and try again.
Tobytone
Verified User
If I'm so "triggered" as you claim, then I guess it's a real mystery why I've been sporting this perma-grin since that glorious November day. lol. It's just adorable watching you flail around trying to insult me. The sad truth is you're the epitome of the Libtard Drone I've been describing all along. From now on, if someone asks, to clear up any confusion, I'll just say, "You know, someone just like 'Diesel' and his crew of drones." It will save me time.
So, as a tribute to your pathetic insult game, which matches your subpar thinking skills, I'll borrow one of your best: 'I know you are, but what am I?' ROFL. Now, go on, hurry up and hit that thumbs down, or maybe that middle finger, or if you're feeling adventurous, go for the puke button. And hey, why not call in your drone squad for backup?
Diesel
Verified User
So many words that mean nothing. I think I'm close to figuring out who you are. Carry on, bitch.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Wow. You're becoming more demented by the day, Terry.
Obviously, they saw the case was legitimate and should move forward to sentencing.
Sea lawyer or not, you voted a felon into office, son.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
He does that a lot. It's amazing he can type so much one-handed.
Tobytone
Verified User
Sign of low intelligence, 'I'm not a toddler, you're a toddler. Can't you come up with your own words?
Oh yes, I was waiting for 'Cohen'. Interesting that a disbarred, disgraced, established liar was even allowed to testify. hmmm LAWFARE MUCH. He said a lot of things, but as I said, I, unlike you went through all of the evidence and there is not one email, text message, recorded conversation, or anything at all to back up his testimony, if you weren't so lazy, you'd know that. Without something to back up his claims, his testimony relies solely on his credibility, and he has none by non-libtard standards. He could say that Diesel sits on his lap before naughty time and without the X-RATED video you probably keep, the jury would have to just believe it. That's Libtard Justice and LAWFARE on display.
This one, is so telling, the libtard mind or lack thereof, is on full display. I'll let you think a bit more about that one. lol CLUELESS!!
Poor Libtard, I know thinking is out of the question, but I'll try this one on you. Just because 'Libtard drone' isn't in a textbook doesn't change the fact that you are one. However lawfare is defined in dictionaries, I imagine it was added so long ago with drones like you in mind.
Let me help you AGAIN: Lawfare as defined: Legal action undertaken as part of a hostile campaign against a country or group,
It starting being used in the late 19th century as a blend of law and warfare. (that's the 1800's for you Libtards) it's really sad that high school failed you so badly.
More, 'I know you are, but what am I' it's a theme with you Libtards today. At the very least, considering you can't make coherent comments, you should be much, much better at insults. NOPE, you poor, sad little drone.
HAVE AN ORIGINAL THOUGHTS, STAY AWAY FROM MEMES AND RADICAL LIBTARD SITES FOR A LITTLE WHILE. it MIGHT help ignite your own thoughts. And, read the damn evidence and show me the compelling stuff. lol
THAT WAS FUN, THANK YOU FOR BEING SUCH MORON AND ADDING A LITTLE ENTERTAINMENT ON AN OTHERWISE DULL DAY. TRUE STORY