first of all you fucking MORON I never said forensic evidence simply recovers itself.
first of all, you fucking uneducated shit-for-brains, you use the passive voice like a six-year-old because you have no idea what you are talking about and you have no business bothering the adults at the adults' table. Go back to the kids' table and resume coloring. I'll have some more crayons sent over to you.
people have to first step back and think could he have been hit by anything other then a bullet,
... and after realizing that there aren't any plausible possibilities beyond the bullets that were fired, they become reassured and move onto something productive.
yes there was shooting when it happened but that doesn't make it a bullet that hit him
... but nobody really considers that an invisible purple gremlin teleported in and stabbed Trump in the ear. If you are going to argue that others who are absolutely sure that Trump was hit by a bullet should somehow doubt that Trump was somehow hit by a bullet, then you need to provide a plausible reason. You can't claim that it could be anything that hit Trump because physics tells us that many things are not possible.
Why should any rational adult remain unsure about what hit Trump's ear? Feel free to incorporate the entirety of your science acumen in your explanation. Don't hold back.
a slight possibility it could have been something else,
Is this "slight" possibility anything that is plausible and that could cause a rational adult to remain unsure about what hit Trump's ear?
with that slight possibility they have to go out and search the area to make sure it was a bullet.
You harp on this but you are mistaken. No one has disclosed to me any details of the crime scene investigation, but I am aware that it is common for bullets to go unrecovered. It is possible that one or more bullets were simply not found before some kid inadvertently discovered it, picked it up and put it in his pocket, or some landscaper's shovel buried it while performing grounds maintenance, or any of a myriad or reasons that a bullet might go unfound. It's also stupid to focus solely on finding a bullet that might not have any DNA on it in the first place, when you can examine the fucking wound. You have at least one examining doctor confirming that it was a bullet wound. You no longer need the bullet. If a doctor confirms a stabbing with a serrated blade, do you remain "unsure" until the DNA-bearing blade is discovered?
I am just showing you morons that there are more possibilities then it JUST being a bullet.
Nope. You're just showing that you are a moron who relies on the passive voice to avoid any and all critical reasoning. What other plausible possibilities are there?
well I am not an expert but wouldn't any power the bullet had on it be burned off at that range?
Nope.
and as for being or not being educated I will put my DEGREES up against yours any day,
That won't do you any good, and you make it very difficult to believe that you have a high school diploma.
How about you demonstrate the full scope of your critical reasoning skills? Set the crayons down and let's have a go at it.
IF all my college credit hours were in one curriculum I would have enough for a masters,
... but they don't really count if you sleep through them. Showing up for class is not enough. You have to learn the material.
