I was talking about the thread title. And then I asked you a question. Why are you so defensive? And one more time... You have said "not for profit" thus promoting a government run system, or something much like that. No freaking way would I trust my kid to be raised by the government.Again Damo, I did not use that universal word. sheesh....
and I mentioned adjusting the cost to income level.
Again Damo, I did not use that universal word. sheesh....
and I mentioned adjusting the cost to income level.
I was talking about the thread title. And then I asked you a question. Why are you so defensive? And one more time... You have said "not for profit" thus promoting a government run system, or something much like that. No freaking way would I trust my kid to be raised by the government.
Right, that's your two choices, Catholic Priests or The Government, those are the only two possible solutions to day care.No let it be run by Catholic priests
We could pay for this by doing away with the deduction on income taxes for children. A libertarian thing
Read the initial post by Cypress, it cleary calls for Universal health care.
Wow, look a solution that doesn't involve the government starting a program of newthought with your kids so that they'll only speak in newspeak....What about dropping companies nominal tax rates by 1 or 2% if they have child care capacity to satisfy at 20% of their workforce. And in cases where companies are too small to do it alone, if they had some sort of trust or partnership with other local firms, they could merge facilities.
it wouldn't have to something that would cost $12K a yr per kid, but basic care - naptime, games, a meal or two etc.
What outrage? It's called sarcasm.Yep and I had a smiley at the end Damo. False outrage ?
You imply it by rejecting any other solution in your answer than government-run care, and suggesting that the only other option was "Catholic Priests" by giving no other solution. You attempt to limit the discussion to your absurdity by using a tool of logic called Reductio ad Absurdam, but in this case the reduction wasn't salient and it became a fallacy. I use sarcasm to note how ridiculous your fallacy was. It is fun.Yep and I had a smiley at the end Damo. False outrage ?
where did I imply or state that mine were the only possible soloutions ?
Wow, look a solution that doesn't involve the government starting a program of newthought with your kids so that they'll only speak in newspeak....
Amazingly there are ways that we can do this without 'universal' government-run daycares that don't involve Catholic Priests. In fact, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a daycare run by Catholic Priests, but heck we can invent one so that USC can send his grandchildren there. Since those are the only two choices we have.
When did health care become part of the conversation?
But anyway, what's the problem with universal child care? We have universal education for children.
yeah... and look how crappy THAT has turned out.