Crepitus
Verified User
Umm, where exactly is my "cheese hole"?oh blow it out your cheese hole.
Umm, where exactly is my "cheese hole"?oh blow it out your cheese hole.
that depends on how you identify.Umm, where exactly is my "cheese hole"?
Do you support abortion for convenience?Dude, are you really stupid enough to believe that shit?
I'm a middle aged white guy.that depends on how you identify.
I support people's right to do any of those things and more, as long as they decide to do it on their own.Do you support abortion for convenience?
Do you support women to not have children and instead work like any other man?
Do you support gender surgery?
Do you support gay/lesbian behavior?
I ask Hume the same questions.
so where is your cheese hole?I'm a middle aged white guy.
I have no idea.so where is your cheese hole?
You are already aware of the voluminous eyewitness testimony that you cannot refute.You can't make it appear. Void.
I'm aware that some people think they saw things, yes. I'm also aware of the investigations into claims, the audits in multiple states, claims proven wrong, security inherent in voting, etc. You only care about what supports what you want to believe.You are already aware of the voluminous eyewitness testimony that you cannot refute.
Nope. You dive into heavy denial over the reality you cannot face, i.e. voluminous eyewitness testimony that you cannot refute, of the stolen election that you cannot convince anyone somehow did not happen.I'm aware that some people think they saw things, yes.
... were conducted by the very people who stole the election, and you know this as well.I'm also aware of the investigations into claims ...
So you support the killing of living humans who have not committed any crime and who have not expressed any desire to die. That makes you a shitty person.I support people's right to do any of those things and more, as long as they decide to do it on their own.
"were conducted by the very people who stole the election, and you know this as well."Nope. You dive into heavy denial over the reality you cannot face, i.e. voluminous eyewitness testimony that you cannot refute, of the stolen election that you cannot convince anyone somehow did not happen.
Denial on your part. Eyewitness testimony. Inability to refute. Meanwhile you have zero evidence that the election wasn't stolen, because it was.
... were conducted by the very people who stole the election, and you know this as well.
Nope. It's you being caught being disingenuous and dishonest."were conducted by the very people who stole the election, and you know this as well."
That is textbook circular reasoning.
And the courts say you are full of it......
It's not. You are assuming the election was stolen, even though the vote total says Biden won. Based on your assumption that the election was stolen, you're assuming that those in positions of influence, in the "stolen" states were in on it.... but that all begins with the assumption of a stolen election.Nope. It's you being caught being disingenuous and dishonest.
what does 'presidential' imply?Here is Colbert using real Trump statements. He is an idiot and to think he is presidential shows you are even more stupid.
which was admitted to in this time article.It's not. You are assuming the election was stolen, even though the vote total says Biden won. Based on your assumption that the election was stolen, you're assuming that those in positions of influence, in the "stolen" states were in on it.... but that all begins with the assumption of a stolen election.
The Time story doesn't change anything. It reads more like an Infowars story than news.which was admitted to in this time article.
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election