How is history being served by removing them?
Because they're no longer glorified.
Any other dumb questions?
How is history being served by removing them?
I did...in the link you obviously refused to read.
Repeating your fallacy and posting it in a huge font is a sure sign that you have lost.
How is history being served by removing them?
An opinion piece.
No, what's happening here is that you're a coward who refuses to read links. You ask a question, I answer it, then you say the question wasn't answered, even though it was...you just refused to accept it because you know you lost this debate and are just trying to save face at this point.
Delete your account; kill yourself
An opinion piece.
Black people have know since the statues went up that they were used to try to intimidate us.
It's racist idiots like you who are trying to deny that fact.
Racist white men will use any tactic to intimidate Blacks.
You offered an opinion piece. I have read it before. And your behavior demonstrates that you have lost. Now who asked you to protect black people from statues? Are black people afraid to visit Gettysburg?
I am not a racist. Please try to compose yourself.
Everyone who says they must be up to "remember".
"Remember" what?
You are flailing.
Thing is, you haven't actually put forth a defense of any kind of these monuments. All you've done is attack arguments against them. But in doing so, you're passively defending them as a means to "remember" history.
Why else would they be erected if not to intimidate black people?
I don't feel any need to be defensive.
It is up to you to make your arguments. You answer no questions. Are black people intimidated by statues? Are black people afraid to visit Gettysburg?
You can't seem to come up with a good reason as to why any of these monuments should be around.
Not one.
No, you're the snowflakes who had to erect participation trophies so you could feel better about losing a war you started, and to intimidate black people who won their freedom in the Civil War from slavery.
Everything else is just noise.
And maybe more black people would go to Gettysburg if it wasn't littered with monuments to those who fought to keep slavery.
Why do you need those monuments, anyway? What purpose are they serving?
A. I have offered no logical fallacy. You should likely refrain from referencing logic since you and it are clearly unacquainted.
B. The post I was responding to said that by removing these statutes history would be flushed into a memory hole.
C. Please try and pay better attention and lie less.
Because they serve as state-sanctioned intimidation of black people.
As a reminder that slavery was defeate