Because Wal-Mart had deeper pockets?
Which former Senator and Secretary of State sat on the Board of said Wal-Mart?
Why do libs think it's OK for illegals to unlawfully invade America?
- Thread starter Big Money
- Start date
Because Wal-Mart had deeper pockets?
Which former Senator and Secretary of State sat on the Board of said Wal-Mart?
christiefan915
Catalyst
I thought cons were against a pathway to legal status.
"President Bush called for a major overhaul of America’s immigration system Wednesday to grant legal status to millions of undocumented workers in the United States, saying the current program was not working."
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3887721/n...legal-status-illegal-immigrants/#.UjzCua7X9n4
christiefan915
Catalyst
Because Wal-Mart was guilty.
What does Hillary's board membership in the '80s and '90s have to do with Wal-mart's illegal actions in 2005?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Members of both parties, for different reasons.
Where is your link buddy? Which thread, which post #? That or link to it, I told you and showed you how.
Now, in reference to post #172 in this thread, are you going to respond or not? These are very simple questions. Certainly a person of your caliber could answer them with ease.
Why do you keep evading the simple facts of the matter?
If Wal-Mart was guilty, you can post a link to such an adjudication, can't you?
Are you claiming that The Hildebeast of Benghazi was innocent of any knowledge of these matters?
In six years as a member of the Wal-Mart board of directors, between 1986 and 1992, Hillary Clinton remained silent as the world's largest retailer waged a major campaign against labor unions seeking to represent store workers.
An ABC News analysis of the videotapes of at least four stockholder meetings where Clinton appeared shows she never once rose to defend the role of American labor unions.
The tapes, broadcast this morning on "Good Morning America," were provided to ABC News from the archives of Flagler Productions, a Lenexa, Kan., company hired by Wal-Mart to record its meetings and events.
A former board member told ABCNews.com that he had no recollection of Clinton defending unions during more than 20 board meetings held in private.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4218509&page=1
Is it your contention that Wal-Mart only hired illegals after The Hildebeast of Benghazi left?
Democrat history (Nannygate) indicates otherwise.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
It's kind of a no brainer to let in highly skilled and educated immigrants, it's the societies they left that should be worried.
It's retarded, we have plenty of college grads underemployed.
Ie the half of our mods who actually went
Taft2016
Verified User
http://democrats.senate.gov/2006/04/12/reid-the-senate-should-return-to-immigration-reform/
Below see excerpts from Harry Reid's letter to then Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, 2006:
Last edited:
T-Fat, why are you posting things which show the base underside of the GOP and the goodness of Harry Reid?
One would assume a man of your bluster and arrogance to be a conservative.
Taft2016
Verified User
Why?
Well for starters because you've been screeching for an historical link for the very topic that post covered; that the GOP rank and file obstructed President Bush's efforts at immigration reform. Which is obviously unnecessary to link to because common sense would tell one that Democrats have always supported it, and if Republicans got behind it as well it would have already passed and we wouldn't even be discussing it now.
This is something that happened a mere 7 years ago and is quite common knowledge. Which indicates to me that you're a political neophyte and had zero political awareness as recently as 2006. Which means you really should be doing more reading and less insulting of those more informed than you.
Your village called, they don't want you back.
Then you would be a retard. Not only am I both smarter and more well informed than you, but based upon your typical arrogance of a conservative parrot, I am older than you as well, since generally speaking, the older, or more educated or more experienced one becomes, the more liberal one becomes.
Lets try this one more time.
Common sense means nothing here, especially what you purport to be common sense.
Your word means nothing here, it proves nothing.
I already completely destroyed your effort involving that particular link, proving that it meant the opposite of what you indicated.
Posting snippets of it again, which support my argument just shows that you are unaware, out of touch with reality, and have not received this week's talking points information sheet from the Rove/Kock Bros. Foundation for the Betterment of the Excessively Wealthy, i.e., you have no fucking clue how to respond.
Got any source for that assertion?
Taft2016
Verified User
Yes. Let's.
Ehhh, no you didn't. It's a second and different link
Let me sum this up for you: For you to "destroy" my point, you would need to prove that the Republicans lined up behind President Bush's immigration reform efforts in 2006 and supported it.
It's quite simple.
I just posted a letter Harry Reid wrote to then Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist bemoaning that not a single Republican in the Senate would get behind the effort.
It's really simple Einstein.... Democrats have always supported "immigration reform". If the Republicans were behind it at the time in 2006, it would have passed and we wouldn't still be talking about it, would we?
What you need to do now is answer my link from Harry Reid and demonstrate that the Republicans rallied behind President Bush's 2006 immigration reform efforts. That is how you will prove me wrong.
But you won't find that link. I think even you know that by now.
And that is why you have nothing other than insults.
EDIT: Oh, and you didn't prove that my link meant the opposite. You just read it wrong you moron. lol.
Yeah, reality. If you need a hint, start by looking at how rulings of the Supremes become more liberal as the justices age.
Like your partisan butt-fuck buddy says, it is common sense.