Why do libs think it's OK for illegals to unlawfully invade America?

Rune said:
Hey Retard! She asked for solid proof. Your word is not solid proof. Fucking moronic dweeb.
Click to expand...

Well you could all quite simply prove me wrong by pointing out legislation liberals enacted, or even introduced, to crack down on illegal aliens.

Now, who resisted Bush's immigration reform in 2006? And who supported it?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/16/immigration/

That led Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid to complain that "the president needs to talk to his own leaders here if he wants comprehensive immigration reform."

"We've got a lot of tough votes coming up," the Nevada Democrat said. "He's got to do more than say, 'I want comprehensive reform.' "
Click to expand...

Not to mention... who gutted Simpson-Mazzoli? Libs.

Who supports the Dream Act? Libs.

Who gives scholarships to illegals? Libs.

Who gives welfare to illegals? Libs.

Who gives housing to illegals? Libs.

Who won't close the border? Libs.

We could go on and on, but why bother? You always scream "LINK UP!", and when people do you run away.
 
Rune said:
Hey Retard! She asked for solid proof. Your word is not solid proof. Fucking moronic dweeb.
Click to expand...

How amusing, the forums Leftist retard thinks everyone else should provide solid proof except for the Liberal lefttards bombarding the forum with their off topic pabulum and typical Marxist anti-Capitalist rants. How expected!
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_illegal_immigrants_in_the_United_States

from the article:


Professor of Law Francine Lipman [54] writes that the belief that illegal migrants are exploiting the US economy and that they cost more in services than they contribute to the economy is "undeniably false". Lipman asserts that "illegal immigrants actually contribute more to public coffers in taxes than they cost in social services" and "contribute to the U.S. economy through their investments and consumption of goods and services; filling of millions of essential worker positions resulting in subsidiary job creation, increased productivity and lower costs of goods and services; and unrequited contributions to Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance programs."[55]
Aviva Chomsky, a professor at Salem State College, states that "Early studies in California and in the Southwest and in the Southeast...have come to the same conclusions. Immigrants, legal and illegal, are more likely to pay taxes than they are to use public services. illegal immigrants aren't eligible for most public services and live in fear of revealing themselves to government authorities. Households headed by illegal immigrants use less than half the amount of federal services that households headed by documented immigrants or citizens make use of."[56]
 
Oops.. :palm:

Eighteen other states have made E-Verify use a requirement for some or all employers.

California did the opposite, banning itself and local jurisdictions from mandating the program.

The bill by Assemblyman Paul Fong, D-Cupertino was backed by immigrant advocates.



http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_19223845?source=rss
 
Truth Detector said:
And you are a complete asshat if you think they do yet post nothing to support your emotional hysterics.

But of course, the Democrats in California are all for illegal immigration based on their rhetoric and legislation. Something you seem to be leaving out of your dimwitted anti-Company Marxist talking points.
Click to expand...

where do they honestly think all those vegetable pickers COME from? LOL
 
Truth Detector said:
It is easier for them to vote than find a job; only a dimwitted leftist fool thinks otherwise.
Click to expand...

but they don't bother coming north if they can't get a job, and they don't stay if the job goes away. Working legally in Mexico is a safer bet than trying to cheat and live on welfare in the US. I know... that is what all the men who built my home told me. They all came back when the housing boom dried up in California. They like to work. They're good at it. They go where the jobs are. Period.
 
some folks obviously think it is perfectly normal to get blowjobs from family members. The rest of us... not so much.
 
Truth Detector said:
No; you should be embarrassed for making asinine claims you cannot begin to back up and then use a case that is non-existent.

Go ahead dimwit; post a link that supports your moronic claim that Wal-Mart broke our immigration laws so you can remove all doubt what an incredibly dumb moron you really are.



Wal-Mart was not criminally prosecuted and could not have known that companies they contracted with employed aliens.
But then, facts are not relevant for low information partisan asshats who stupidly parrot DNC/Union talking points.

Wall-Mart was assaulted by this idiot Government in an effort to extract fines for something it did not do. As a good Corporation, it settled the “allegations” because paying off the Feds was less costly than a long drawn out struggle.

Wal-Mart is a deep pocketed business Liberal Democrats see as opportunity to blackmail and extract based on fraudulent claims. These businesses were contracted to provide janitorial services and not directly employed by Wal-Mart which is why no criminal prosecution was charged.

Of course in the dimwitted world of Liberal asshats like yourself who could care less about the truth, reality or the facts, dragging down a huge business like Wal-Mart that employs hundreds of thousands is a great way to create more jobs.

Now the real question is this; how many of those presumed illegal aliens that worked for these companies used forged documents and were immediately deported? Funny how asshats like you think that the case is satisfied when the “evil” big corporation is blackmailed by Democrat officials and think that is the end of the case or that it somehow solves a much larger problem in the US.

LITTLE ROCK — Wal-Mart Stores Inc. escaped criminal charges but agreed Friday to pay $11 million, a record fine in a civil immigration case, to end a federal probe into its use of illegal immigrants to clean floors at stores in 21 states.

A dozen contractors who actually hired the laborers for work inside stores for the world’s largest retailer agreed to plead guilty to criminal immigration charges and together pay an additional $4 million in fines.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2005/mar/19/wal-mart-fined-in-immigrant-case/

Facts are not your forte' dimwit; clueless parroting the dimwitted talking points of the left are.
Click to expand...

No, they are my friend, you are just twisting them to fit your agenda.
 
Truth Detector said:
When dimwitted idiots make false claims; it is incumbent for them to prove their claims, not the other way around.

But then, you are a dimwitted partisan asshat, how could you possibly comprehend the OBVIOUS?
Click to expand...

Okay, another dodge, you have nothing, so you provide nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top