That remark reveals your pure hate and it also reveals that you detest the idea of a peaceful settlement. Not even your president is willing to go that far publicly. You're literally hoping and maybe even praying that the Russian initiative for peace fails. Your politics are leading into an evil position. Be careful, it doesn't go unnoticed.
Will Obama's Syrian debacle blot his legacy?
- Thread starter Big Money
- Start date
That remark reveals your pure hate and it also reveals that you detest the idea of a peaceful settlement. Not even your president is willing to go that far publicly. You're literally hoping and maybe even praying that the Russian initiative for peace fails. Your politics are leading into an evil position. Be careful, it doesn't go unnoticed.
You mean Barack Obama is nothing more than a common oil whore?
evince
Truthmatters
dear fucking fact adverse idiot,
what do you know about the syrain oil fields?
do you KNOW they are a dwindling source of oil?
You Americans can argue among yourselves on which party is the most guilty all you like. But you should know that it's not one party or the other for the rest of the world. It's you and it's your country. We really don't care which party's president leads the world into war and slaughter of innocents. The dying under US bombs is always the same.
There were no cohorts fabricating lies on Iraq unless you want to impugn the entire Clinton Administration and Democrat leadership in the House and Senate.
All believed the WMD argument; yet it wasn't even the primary reason for going into Iraq as illustrated by the Joint Resolution on Iraq which apparently you and many others still refuse to read and which contained over 1,800 words of which on,y 250 were devoted to the WMD question.
Read; become informed instead of a parrot of moronic DNC talking points.
evince
Truthmatters
evince
Truthmatters
If you knew how to google, you would find that it was Johnson who started the combat role of American troops in Vietnam without congressional support for it.
But alas, you're not the anti-party, but rather anti-facts person. You're a Liberal and are too ashamed to admit it. I don't blame you, Liberals are stupid and uninformed, but your attempts to camaflouge it are not working. You're coming across as stupid and uninformed.
Damn; this commentary required a LOT of kool-aid.
We shall see; I think my perspective was closer to the truth.
True, Iraq was the result of immense bi-partisan approval based on a legal right through the UN and agreements broken be Saadam. Syria is merely the result of feckless bluster and a desperate unilateral attempt to back up Obamas moronic redline rhetoric, which he now claims was everyone else's, and yet he stands alone.
But there is some similarity here, Russia was against Bush on Iraq which morons on the left agreed with, and is mow against action on Syria, which morons on the left now disagree with. Why? Because this time it is their woefully inept Messiahs reputation on he line.
Carry on clueless wonder.
Sure, right after you explain how letting Saddam get away with it was better.
By the wy, your argument, as always, is a strawman. No one is suggesting Assad will get away "Scott free."
Where do you come up with this unadulterated crap?
How comedic; a clueless hyper partisan idiot calling others idiots. We call this irony.
You can't condemn Putin for taking a correct stand, it's just not credible. There are other issues you can blame him for.
Canada took the right stand on Iraq and stayed out. Jean Chretien, our PM at the time led our country into taking the right position in retrospect.
Preventing war is the UN's mandate and will always be preferable to going to war. War kills people. Stopping the Syrian war is the correct position to take. Going to war with Syria is the exact opposite of that. Why is it that you fail to accept that? Do you really want us to believe after all you have said that your concern is about the Syrian people?.
It's no more that than it was a concern about the people of Iraq. It all has to do with the reason why your country and any other country has an interest in the ME. It will never be anything more than that.
What makes this thing smell so bad to other people than AMericans is that you on the other side politically are still trying to throw some justification behind the Iraq war.
I know your motives are political and that's bad enough but I also know that your motives are in support of evil if you are still unable to come to terms with the obvious truth about Iraq. It was a criminal action waged for phony reasons and it brands your country as criminal.
Why should the world grant you the opportunity to do it all again in another country?
But your okay when despots, tyrants and dictators bomb innocents; got it.
As for America bombing innocents, it is very hard to take such an asinine offensive claim serious, but there you go again pretending that the nation who has done more to liberate nations from the chains of tyranny would target innocents while trying to liberate nations. It is beyond ignorant and stupid.
Perhaps it is because you are naive and incredibly stupid that compells you to parrot such moronic claims. But let me attempt to open that incredibly dull mind to a painful reality of the Middle East and dealing with terrorists; they don't care about civilian casualties. They have no moral dilemna using civilians as shields, killing them for their cause or hiding among them to commit atrocities. As soon as you are capable of getting that through your dullard mind, the sooner you wil be able to make more intelligent arguments rather than the mindless drivel and parroting leftist/terrorist propaganda that currently erupts from your keyboard.
Carry on fool.