Notice how this allows for the CCP computer hacking theory.
I note that as we are told that this was not terrorism investigators still have no idea why power was lost.
Power loss on transport ships is not a terrorist plan. They are huge complicated ships and nothing blew up and nobody was shot. You are a Russian, right-wing conspiracy nut.
Notice how this allows for the CCP computer hacking theory.
I seriously doubt that the ship's engineering systems computer was hooked to the internet.
I seriously doubt that the ship's engineering systems computer was hooked to the internet.
The pictures are devastating.... Unbelievable how the bridge could completely collapse like that...so sad...
I am a Truth Teller, who lives amongst the most brainwashed people that have ever been, and the most ignorant.
Good call, Hawkeye. I should've known this was no accident.I really want to know more about the smoke:
Just finished reading part of an article on this disaster here:
Baltimore Bridge Strike Another Bizarre Disaster | Courageous Discourse
Here's an interesting bit of information from the article:
**
Reports about rudder control are conflicting, with some stating that the ship lost rudder control when it lost power. However, a detailed CNN report states the following:
The pilot of the ship did “everything that he could have done” to both slow the vessel down and keep it from drifting toward the bridge, according to Clay Diamond, executive director and general counsel of the American Pilots Association.
Diamond told CNN he has been in close communication with the Association of Maryland Pilots regarding what unfolded on the Dali cargo ship in the moments leading up to the crash.
“Just minutes before the bridge, there was a total blackout on the ship, meaning that the ship lost engine power and electrical power, it was a complete blackout,” Diamond said.
The pilot quickly gave a string of orders, calling for a hard rudder to port – as far left as possible – and for the anchor to be dropped. The pilot was the one who contacted the pilot dispatch office to shut down traffic to the bridge, Diamond said.
Again, why didn’t the pilot simply hold his course? And if he called for a hard rudder to port, why in hell did he also drop an anchor, which nullified the course correction from the port rudder input? This was basically the same error made by the pilot of the Titanic, who turned the rudder hard to port while simultaneously reversing the engines.
View attachment 26037
The above shows the ship’s position just before it struck the pier, having continued its turn to starboard and out of the channel.
In short, the maritime disaster appears to be yet another huge head-scratcher. Lord, there are so many these days!
And what are we to make of those “thirteen damaged containers—some with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] and/or hazardous materials [HAZMAT] contents”?
**
Good call, Hawkeye. I should've known this was no accident.
By law the ship master (captain) is required to have a port pilot aboard when entering and leaving port. It may mean nothing but the ship's captain was Ukrainian.Another side story is that there were two pilots aboard....which almost certainly means that one was a trainee...which easily could have been part of how things went so wrong...could not have gone worse.
By law the ship master (captain) is required to have a port pilot aboard when entering and leaving port. It may mean nothing but the ship's captain was Ukrainian.