Dear CHRISTIANS-How will this marriage destroy traditional marriage?

[Cancel 2016.2]

Yes, they do.

So you think they can violate the law that says they cannot?

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

So you think they can violate the law that says they cannot?

When the law violates my constitutional rights, yes.

 

[Timshel]

I agree, the state has an agenda. That's why our founders gave us a constitution, which stands in your way. Forcing people to bow to the state's agenda is the goal.

You do not agree. The constitution is the state's proper agenda and you are at war with it.

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

You do not agree. The constitution is the state's proper agenda and you are at war with it.

Nope. Go for it. Show me.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

When the law violates my constitutional rights, yes.

Again... in NO way does it violate your rights or theirs.

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

Again... in NO way does it violate your rights or theirs.

When you force me to bake a cake I don't want to because of my religion, you have violated the constitution.

 

[Timshel]

Nope. Go for it. Show me.

14th amendment. Done.

 

[Timshel]

When you force me to bake a cake I don't want to because of my religion, you have violated the constitution.

Which part?

Nobody is being forced to bake a cake.

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

Which part?

Nobody is being forced to bake a cake.

You're gonna have to get up to speed.

 

[Timshel]

You're gonna have to get up to speed.

No one is being forced to bake a cake.

Which part of the Constitution is violated? Do you have an actual argument?

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

No one is being forced to bake a cake.

Which part of the Constitution is violated? Do you have an actual argument?

Yes, they were. Read the thread.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Nobody's forcing him to do anything.

so if a gay couple comes into his business and says we are married, may he say "no, you're not".....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You don't have to recognize the marriage of a gay couple as marriage.

so we can ignore those laws that the gays are seeking to enforce regarding marriage rights?......doesn't that sort of undermine their purpose in pursuing them?.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Nobody is being forced to bake a cake.

/boggle......

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

The gays are Christophobic bigots. Kinda mean spirited too. Bullies.

 

[Celticguy]

Pretty sure the Federal civil rights act covers this topic. A public business does not have the right to discriminate based on race, religion, gender or orientation. Most states have adopted similar, sometimes more stringent laws.

orientation, no.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Why not just say the thought of two guys having sex and getting married kills my boner? That's a more valid argument than anything posted in this thread so far.

 

[Ishmael Pequod]

Why not just say the thought of two guys having sex and getting married kills my boner? That's a more valid argument than anything posted in this thread so far.

Thread makes you uncomfortable? Are you a Christophobic, bigoted, mean spirited bully?

 

[MAGA MAN]

So what if it has had a traditional definition? Is it unchangeable?

Yes.

 

[MAGA MAN]

The state does not have an interest in protecting traditional definitions.

The discrimination is based on what two adults do in private.

1. Yes it does, since traditional married is the backbone of a polite society.
2. No it's not, since you don't have to be married to do whatever it is they do in private.