Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Leftist statistd care very much about rights, unless you're a Christian. So what!!
Dear CHRISTIANS-How will this marriage destroy traditional marriage?
- Thread starter zappasguitar
- Start date
LOL, via the 14th, which is why they should not be able to limit marriage and is the basis for the state law in question. Baking a cake is not a religious ritual or an establishment of religion.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Remember.....there is no war against culture and Christians.....
"Constitutional law" is why the Constitution has been usurped. I actually read the Constitution, along with the Federalist papers. Reading it as plain language is the best way to "interpret" it. Reading the words of its writers who "sold" it to the American public at the time is the best way to understand their intent. Anything else is bullshit.
You may want to read your links before posting them, they do not support your claim.
This sort of illogical non sequitur leaves no limit on government power.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Nope. Ignoring the constitution does, though.
"or free exersize thereof" it requires them condone that whi h they cannot condone.
This is a good example for use of irony:
They do support my claim.
How is that? You and your buddies are all supporters of big government and totalitarian state that would be empowered to dictate family arrangements in the interest of promoting a polite society.
like I said, read them. "by the government" from one and there is no proof that the decision was malicious etc from the other.
It does not. They are not forced to condone marriage between members of different races or religions.
When this bakery made a cake for a wedding of two dogs was that an exercise of their religion?
No, as a conservative "me and my buddies" want the federal government to be limited to the enumerated powers. We also want state governments to not be forced to license activities that, in the opinion of their citizens or legislatures, aren't beneficial to that state.
I have read the Constitution, DofI, Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers, as I am sure most of the Justices have. You are ignorant of the reasoning used by the courts and have little basis on which to criticize it. You are just another empty bag of wind.
Dogs cannot be party to contracts so no worries. As to the first sentence, yes it does and the rest is jibberish.
No, you don't. Where in the constitution is the state enumerated with a power to promote polite society or defend traditional definitions?
What the opposition thought regarding the Constitution as ratified may be interesting but basically meaningless. They lost the debate as surely as one who uses personal insults has.
What does the contract have to do with it? Is making a wedding cake an exercise of religion or not?
No one is forcing them to condone any marriage. Your arguments are worthless crap and will never succeed.
again, the Constitution limits the federal government. The states have their own constitutions.