Dems Continue to Rehabilitate and Unify With Bush-Era Neocons

What are the odds that anatta is a paid Russian shill?
bot. not Russian shill :rolleyes:

Hillary blames Russia and Macedonia for her election loss. ... They were connected to the bots.

http://theduran.com/hillary-clinton...r-election-loss-in-bizarre-onstage-interview/
So this was different because they went public, and they were conveying this weaponized information and the content of it, and they were running, y’know there’s all these stories, about y’know, guys over in Macedonia who are running these fake news sites, and you know I’ve seen them now, and you sit there and it looks like you know sort of low level CNN operation, or a fake newspaper.”

“That really influenced the information people were relying on. If you look at Facebook the vast majority of the news items posted were fake. They were connected to, as we now know, the 1000 Russian agents… They were connected to the bots. It was such a new experience. I understand why people on Facebook would think ‘oh Hillary Clinton did that. I did not know that.'”
 
ah, nobody really believes that silly shit.......wait, did you?......ROFL.......you did, didn't you.......

Trump's healthcare reform effort is entirely about shifting money to the top 1%. His tax reforms are aimed towards shifting money to the top 1%. Sounds great if you believe that money from the rich trickles down to the lower classes, but time has shown that it doesn't. The rich get richer and the middle class especially gets squeezed to make up the difference. Trump's cabinet is packed to the brim with Wall Streeters and billionaires. Don't you feel like a sucker to have believed Trump when he criticized Hillary for this?

Trump's hotel serves as a lobbying compound for lobbyists and foreign officials.
 
Trump's healthcare reform effort is entirely about shifting money to the top 1%. His tax reforms are aimed towards shifting money to the top 1%. Sounds great if you believe that money from the rich trickles down to the lower classes, but time has shown that it doesn't. The rich get richer and the middle class especially gets squeezed to make up the difference. Trump's cabinet is packed to the brim with Wall Streeters and billionaires. Don't you feel like a sucker to have believed Trump when he criticized Hillary for this?

Trump's hotel serves as a lobbying compound for lobbyists and foreign officials.

now you're just spouting 90's lib'rul memes without bothering to adjust them to the facts.......so tiresome.....
 
I haven't "missed it. I mentioned it's improving -read the article that give the short term forecast
the one's you posted are long term systemic problems..but their economy is still improving in 2017 over last year-again read that link i gave you.
I even mentioned it was an extraction economy, and I've showed Putin is now pressing into the Arctic along with Nordstream 2 .
if/when energy prices do come back up - and despite Russian systemic corruption-their economy will be back in the 2-2.5%GDP growth range.

?

of course he was right not to war over Crimea. Have I ever said otherwise?
Obama's crime was his negligence in NOT engaging Putin w/diplomacy, even though he didn't war.
as a result, and in combination w/Obama's idiotic sanction on Egypt, and his dithering with the Sunni states - while playing patsy w/ Iran; that played right into Putin's hands .
it gave Egypt and SA /Sunni states real reasons to start buying weapons from Moscow.

And it isn't just limited to weapons. Sisi has signed contracts for fertilizer and agriculture with Moscow.
It's not just about "ships" ( hard power ) it's letting Russia back into the ME as a trading partner as well as a security partner.
Obama did this by his inability to deal with Putin,as well as his stupid moves in the ME
COLD WAR NOT GOING TO WAR
Cold war 2. escalations . more battalions in Latvia/dangerous war games in the Baltics/increase tank battalions in Poland/permanent deployments in Finland ( all new)..
I could go on and on..and for what? not for 'security'
That makes the situation yet more tense/more expensive to deal with, and any "trip wire conflict" could set off a real shooting war.
This is not desirable to the USA/NATO or Russia -so what do we do?? add MORE SANCTIONS and make it impossible to de-escalate by Trump.. do you see how insane this is??
if nothing else please tell me you see the craziness of mindless escalations!

I don't "praise Putin. Bottom line he is a KGB thug. I'm am a American and I want us to win any conflicts -hard or soft.
But i do admire Putin ( this is what Trump was saying) because he has an inferior economy, an inferior military- yet he managed to make considerable gains without firing a shot.
He is one hell of a great geo-political chess player, while Obama wasn't even playing checkers.

So what's the best path forward? as well as SEEKING PEACE and detente' maybe we should give him his due that he is shrewd. But like you said he is hurting from sanctions.
That looks like an ideal situation to talk to him,and negotiate to better both our situations ( realpolitik)

You gotta get past this Russiaphobic mindset that is sweeping up everything into a "zero sum game" where anything we do to unscrew pressure is automatically considered a win for Putin.
That's how John McCain reacts.That's what neocons drive. and agenda to cripple Putin but also not to advantage
ourselves.
If we can ratchett down Cold War spending - even if Putin does the same -is that not a good thing for us to do??

PS. I appreciate you reaching out good brother. While we never agree on domestic politics, i have always valued your ideas on war/foreign relations.. I hope you consider what I say with an open mind.
There is a much better way forward for the world, then the set p we have now.

Sorry about the delay .. really busy yesterday.

We remain on opposite poles regarding Putin. He does not seek peace by any stretch of the imagination. You don't seek peace by interfering in your enemies election.

Putin can be controlled by sanctions and continued pressure on the Russian economy and his crony government. What is he going to do about it? Go to war? Expel a few diplomats? He lacks soft power.

Much has been made of Putin's outreach to Israel .. but it may be that the Israelis are just playing him to extort more money from US taxpayers to support the welfare state of Israel. Is Putin going to offer them money to replace what US taxpayers have been forking over?

We could go on and on about Putin and Russia, but in your praise of Putin, you've missed an awful lot of critical elements in your analysis.

The best way forward, continue the course of sanctions and pressure. Don't give him an inch .. consider him an enemy who cannot be trusted .. and attack the propaganda being spread that all news not favorable to Trump and Putin is 'fake news.'

I still consider your pro-Putin slant to be very dangerous.
 
Congress Reaches Deal on Russia Sanctions, Setting Up Tough Choice for Trump

WASHINGTON — Congressional leaders have reached an agreement on sweeping sanctions legislation to punish Russia for its election meddling and aggression toward its neighbors, they said Saturday, defying the White House’s argument that President Trump needs flexibility to adjust the sanctions to fit his diplomatic initiatives with Moscow.

The new legislation would sharply limit the president’s ability to suspend or terminate the sanctions — a remarkable handcuffing by a Republican-led Congress six months into Mr. Trump’s tenure. It is also the latest Russia-tinged turn for a presidency consumed by investigations into the Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian officials, including conversations between Trump advisers and Russian officials about prospective sanctions relief.

Now, Mr. Trump could soon face a decision he hoped to avoid: veto the bill — a move that would fuel accusations that he is doing the bidding of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia — or sign legislation imposing sanctions his administration has opposed.
“A nearly united Congress is poised to send President Putin a clear message on behalf of the American people and our allies,” said Senator Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “and we need President Trump to help us deliver that message.”

The bill aims to punish Russia not only for interference in the election but also for its annexation of Crimea, continuing military activity in eastern Ukraine and human rights abuses. Proponents of the measure seek to impose sanctions on people involved in human rights abuses, suppliers of weapons to the government of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria and those undermining cybersecurity, among others.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/22/us/politics/congress-sanctions-russia.html
 
EU sanctions hurting Russian firms, US says

EU and US economic sanctions are draining money from some Russian companies and from its state aid fund, according to US research.

The sanctions have, over the past two years, wiped out one third of the operating profit, half of the assets, and one third of the staff in some targeted Russian firms, a new study by the US state department said.

Russian oil firms, such as Rosneft have no access to short-term credit or high-end technology.

Russia’s foreign reserve fund, which is being used to prop up affected companies, is due to run dry in early 2017 at the current rate of spending, it also found.
https://euobserver.com/foreign/135256

Germany wants more EU sanctions on Russia over Siemens Crimea turbines - sources
July 24, 2017

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Germany is urging the European Union to add up to four more Russian nationals and companies to the bloc's sanctions blacklist over Siemens (SIEGn.DE) gas turbines delivered to Moscow-annexed Crimea, two sources in Brussels said.

The EU has barred its firms from doing business with Crimea since the 2014 annexation, imposed sanctions on Russian individuals and entities, and curbed cooperation with Russia in energy, arms and finance over its role in the crisis in Ukraine.

After it annexed Crimea from Kiev, Moscow threw its support behind a separatist rebellion in eastern Ukraine, which has killed more than 10,000 people and is still simmering.

The EU's blacklist comprises 150 people and 37 entities subject to an asset freeze and a travel ban. The restrictions are in place until Sept. 15.

"The regular review would normally be the moment to look at who is on the list. In the past, when there were good grounds, we've added entries to the list," an EU official said.

Siemens, trying to distance itself from the scandal, last week said it was halting deliveries of power equipment to Russian state-controlled customers and reviewing supply deals.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-crimea-siemens-eu-excl-idUSKBN1A9138

Admire Putin as some geo-political genius???

I think not.
 
Sorry about the delay .. really busy yesterday.

We remain on opposite poles regarding Putin. He does not seek peace by any stretch of the imagination. You don't seek peace by interfering in your enemies election.

Putin can be controlled by sanctions and continued pressure on the Russian economy and his crony government. What is he going to do about it? Go to war? Expel a few diplomats? He lacks soft power.

Much has been made of Putin's outreach to Israel .. but it may be that the Israelis are just playing him to extort more money from US taxpayers to support the welfare state of Israel. Is Putin going to offer them money to replace what US taxpayers have been forking over?

We could go on and on about Putin and Russia, but in your praise of Putin, you've missed an awful lot of critical elements in your analysis.

The best way forward, continue the course of sanctions and pressure. Don't give him an inch .. consider him an enemy who cannot be trusted .. and attack the propaganda being spread that all news not favorable to Trump and Putin is 'fake news.'

I still consider your pro-Putin slant to be very dangerous.

oh well too bad. you completely miss the points of realpolitik and sanctions do not change behavior.
also you miss the points that sanctions hurt the the EU ( which you missed in your Siemens post -i covered it yesterday talking to AMADEUS ) Siemens lost sales to Russia now, and a long term partnership.

We remain on opposite poles regarding Putin. He does not seek peace by any stretch of the imagination. You don't seek peace by interfering in your enemies election.
1996. Boris Yeltsin, the president of Russia, was up for re-election in the summer and the United States felt that he was easier to deal with than his opposition, Communist rival Gennadi Zyuganov. But Yeltsin, the hard-partying and affable leader, had health problems and his approval rating was dismal -- single digits. His chances did not look good.

Enter the United States, which, in a clandestine operation successfully helped Yeltsin pulled out a win.

"For four months, a group of American political consultants clandestinely participated in guiding Yeltsin's campaign, " Time magazine wrote in a cover story titled "Yanks To The Rescue — The Secret Story Of How American Advisers Helped Yeltsin Win." Here is the inside story of how these advisers helped Yeltsin achieve the victory that will keep reform in Russia alive."

The 6,000-word story tells a tale of how Felix Braynin, a close friend of some of Yeltsin's top aides, thought Yeltsin would need help to win.

Most of Yeltsin's confidants believed the President would be magically re-elected despite the Duma catastrophe, but Braynin thought otherwise. The President, he reasoned, could lose without the same kind of professional assistance U.S. office seekers employ as a matter of course. Braynin began a series of confidential discussions with Yeltsin's aides, including one with First Deputy Prime Minister Oleg Soskovets, who at the time was in charge of the President's nascent re-election effort. Finally, in early February, Braynin was instructed to "find some Americans" but to proceed discreetly. "Secrecy was paramount," says Braynin. "Everyone realized that if the Communists knew about this before the election, they would attack Yeltsin as an American tool. We badly needed the team, but having them was a big risk."

To "find some Americans," Braynin worked through Fred Lowell, a San Francisco lawyer with close ties to California's Republican Party. On Feb. 14, Lowell called Joe Shumate, a G.O.P. expert in political data analysis who had served as deputy chief of staff to California Governor Pete Wilson. Since Wilson's drive for the 1996 Republican presidential nomination had ended almost before it began, Lowell thought Shumate and George Gorton, Wilson's longtime top strategist, might be available to help Yeltsin. They were--and they immediately enlisted Richard Dresner, a New York-based consultant who had worked with them on many of Wilson's campaigns.

Dresner had another connection that would prove useful later on. In the late 1970s and early '80s, he had joined with Dick Morris to help Bill Clinton get elected Governor of Arkansas. As Clinton's current political guru, Morris became the middleman on those few occasions when the Americans sought the Administration's help in Yeltsin's re-election drive. So while Clinton was uninvolved with Yeltsin's recruitment of the American advisers, the Administration knew of their existence--and although Dresner denies dealing with Morris, three other sources have told Time that on at least two occasions the team's contacts with Morris were "helpful."

Then President Bill Clinton knew all about the effort. "So while Clinton was uninvolved with Yeltsin's recruitment of the American advisers, the Administration knew of their existence -- and although Dresner denies dealing with Morris, three other sources have told Time that on at least two occasions the team's contacts with Morris were 'helpful.' "

The team did plenty of nefarious things to keep their identities secret.

The American team hired two young men, Braynin's son Alan and Steven Moore, a public relations specialist from Washington, to assist them, and promptly established its office in a two-room suite at the President Hotel. The Americans lived elsewhere in the hotel and were provided with a car, a former KGB agent as a driver, and two bodyguards. They were told they should assume that their phones and rooms were bugged, that they should leave the hotel only infrequently, and that they should avoid the campaign's other staff members.

The Americans managed to hide their identity for many months. In interviewing various polling and focus-group companies before hiring three, they described themselves as representing Americans eager to sell thin-screen televisions in Russia. "That story held for far longer than it ever should have," says Shumate. The Americans carried multiple-entry visas identifying them as working for the "Administration of the President of the Russian Federation," a bit of obviousness that constantly threatened to undermine all the supposed secrecy surrounding their real work.

And Clinton was involved.

Communicating in code — Clinton was called the Governor of California, Yeltsin the Governor of Texas — the Americans sought Morris' help. They had earlier worked together to script Clinton's summit meeting with Yeltsin in mid-April. The main goal then was to have Clinton swallow hard and say nothing as Yeltsin lectured him about Russia's great-power prerogatives. "The idea was to have Yeltsin stand up to the West, just like the Communists insisted they would do if Zyuganov won," says a Clinton Administration official. "By having Yeltsin posture during that summit without Clinton's getting bent out of shape, Yeltsin portrayed himself as a leader to be reckoned with. That helped Yeltsin in Russia, and we were for Yeltsin."

The American team wanted Clinton to call Yeltsin to urge that he appear in his ads. The request reached Clinton — that much is known — but no one will say whether the call was made.

And, it worked.

A bit of relief came when a CNN correspondent reported that "the only thing voters we've spoken with like less than Yeltsin is the prospect of upheaval." Dresner howled. "It worked," he shouted. "The whole strategy worked. They're scared to death!" After months being cooped up in the President Hotel wearing blue jeans, sneakers and PETE WILSON FOR PRESIDENT T shirts, the Americans headed for the building where Russia's central election commission would be announcing the results as they came in. "The hell with security," Dresner said. "I want to see this." And there they sat near the back of the auditorium, six guys in suits with computer projections in their hands and a lap-top computer. The place was overrun with reporters, but Yeltsin's secret American advisers were never recognized.
http://www.dailywire.com/news/18593/flashback-time-magazine-1996-bragged-about-how-us-joseph-curl
So maybe the U.S. press corps, with all its feigned indignation over the supposed collusion between Russia and President Trump, need to brush up on their history. It's not the first time a nation has sought to influence another nation's election — and it won't be the last.
 
Putin can be controlled by sanctions and continued pressure on the Russian economy and his crony government
yet he has not been controlled

Now tell me why it makes any sense for Siemens to do any of the following from a business viewpoint:

Siemens to cut back Russia trade after generators end up in Crimea
Munich-based Siemens said it would freeze deliveries of power generation equipment to state-controlled Russian customers.

It will also divest its minority stake in Russian company Interautomatika, which sells power-plant control systems.

And it will terminate a licensing agreement for power generation equipment that it had signed with Russian firms.

"Siemens is implementing an additional controls regime that is exceeding legal requirements by far," it said.
https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/sie...d-up-in-crimea

it doesn't help Siemens or the people of Crimea, or the country of Germany, or Russia.
Again I tell you sanctions are about making us feel good, but they are ineffective,
and they come at a cost for ALL involved.
 
yet he has not been controlled



it doesn't help Siemens or the people of Crimea, or the country of Germany, or Russia.
Again I tell you sanctions are about making us feel good, but they are ineffective,
and they come at a cost for ALL involved.

Nonsense.

The sanctions are hurting Putin's tiny economy without question .. which is why he's running around the world crying about them.

The fact that sanctions are hurting Russia doesn't require geo-political genius to figure out .. yet, you still cling to the propaganda.

That's fine .. as long as the sanctions remain in place and even ratcheting them up when necessary.
 
..... top 1%...... trickles down........rich get richer......

Those are not memes.

anything there sound familiar?......

Yes. Your point?

Stagnant wages, even with productivity increases, is a by-product of the 1980s Reagan policies -- which largely continued and continues to this day. It is the product of neo-liberal economic principles, whereby tax cuts and deregulation creates economic prosperity. Which it does, but only for the super-upper-class. The middle class continues to get squeezed, and part of the reason Trump beat Hillary is because the Clintons bought into neo-liberal economics. Trump PROMISED a break from these policies, but he has continued them and in fact rolled full-steam ahead (except in the one area it actually made sense, TPP).

I'm not throwing talking points at you. I'm hitting you with reality.
 
Nonsense.

The sanctions are hurting Putin's tiny economy without question .. which is why he's running around the world crying about them.

The fact that sanctions are hurting Russia doesn't require geo-political genius to figure out .. yet, you still cling to the propaganda.

That's fine .. as long as the sanctions remain in place and even ratcheting them up when necessary.

Putin hasn't been controlled, but he has certainly been influenced. The oligarchs are DESPERATE to get the sanctions lifted. Putin is surviving the sanctions, but he is not thriving by any stretch of the imagination. Like a muscle, an economy either grows or atrophies. Russia is in a state of economic atrophy, and the notion that Putin isn't feeling that hurt is beyond ludicrous.
 
Putin hasn't been controlled, but he has certainly been influenced. The oligarchs are DESPERATE to get the sanctions lifted. Putin is surviving the sanctions, but he is not thriving by any stretch of the imagination. Like a muscle, an economy either grows or atrophies. Russia is in a state of economic atrophy, and the notion that Putin isn't feeling that hurt is beyond ludicrous.

I completely agree.
 
Those are not memes.

lol.....

Stagnant wages, even with productivity increases, is a by-product of the 1980s Reagan policies -- which largely continued and continues to this day. It is the product of neo-liberal economic principles, whereby tax cuts and deregulation creates economic prosperity. Which it does, but only for the super-upper-class. The middle class continues to get squeezed, and part of the reason Trump beat Hillary is because the Clintons bought into neo-liberal economics. Trump PROMISED a break from these policies, but he has continued them and in fact rolled full-steam ahead (except in the one area it actually made sense, TPP).
here are some more.....
 
Nonsense.

The sanctions are hurting Putin's tiny economy without question .. which is why he's running around the world crying about them.

The fact that sanctions are hurting Russia doesn't require geo-political genius to figure out .. yet, you still cling to the propaganda.

That's fine .. as long as the sanctions remain in place and even ratcheting them up when necessary.
are you even reading what I write?
What good is "hurting Russia" ( and also the EU countries too don't forget) if it doesn't change Putin's behavior?
You consistently miss this..maybe you're happy enough "hurting Russia"
whacking Putin like a dog with a rolled up newspaper- but how is that helpful?
Where has it changed Putin's behavior? whacking a dog at least changes behavior!

Seimens is hurt by putting in sanctions, so is Russia, but does it change Crimea?? how does this help either Germany or Russia? Straining relations just leads to more dysfunction

Germany warns Russia of straining ties over Siemens scandal, report says
https://www.dailysabah.com/energy/2...raining-ties-over-siemens-scandal-report-says
 
are you even reading what I write?
What good is "hurting Russia" ( and also the EU countries too don't forget) if it doesn't change Putin's behavior?
You consistently miss this..maybe you're happy enough "hurting Russia"

If Putin wasn't influenced, he wouldn't have a legion of lobbyists and agents pushing for sanctions relief. If he wants to hurt Russia, that's on him and not America. The Russian people will either tolerate or they won't.

The alternative is basically ZERO consequences and endless enabling of Putin -- one saggy-titted bald man with delusions of grandeur.
 
are you even reading what I write?
What good is "hurting Russia" ( and also the EU countries too don't forget) if it doesn't change Putin's behavior?
You consistently miss this..maybe you're happy enough "hurting Russia"
whacking Putin like a dog with a rolled up newspaper- but how is that helpful?
Where has it changed Putin's behavior? whacking a dog at least changes behavior!

Seimens is hurt by putting in sanctions, so is Russia, but does it change Crimea?? how does this help either Germany or Russia? Straining relations just leads to more dysfunction

Germany warns Russia of straining ties over Siemens scandal, report says
https://www.dailysabah.com/energy/2...raining-ties-over-siemens-scandal-report-says

None of this is about trying to convince you about anything Putin. You seem to prefer his way over your own country .. your words.

Sanctions are meant to punish .. and ..

The sanctions have, over the past two years, wiped out one third of the operating profit, half of the assets, and one third of the staff in some targeted Russian firms, a new study by the US state department said.

If you think that doesn't hurt .. that's on you.

My posts on this are meant to contradict what you say about Putin and Russia. Not meant to convince you of anything.
 
Back
Top