"He still had to pay a huge judgement."
Wrong, with interest, it is over 100 million dollars now and I doubt it will ever be paid.
Ok, but my point still stands, he suffered legal consequences for the murders. A jury did find he was a murderer.
"He still had to pay a huge judgement."
Wrong, with interest, it is over 100 million dollars now and I doubt it will ever be paid.
"He still had to pay a huge judgement."
Wrong, with interest, it is over 100 million dollars now and I doubt it will ever be paid.
The murders by OJ occurred in 1994...30 years ago.
He even served jail time over the issues relating to that judgement as he was involved in a heist to try to get items back.
Using what standard? In my opinion, yes. In the civil courts, yes. In the criminal context, no.
Using the standard of low intelligence leftists. Trump was never criminally convicted of rape and leftists call him a rapist because of the civil suit. If it's true that trumps a rapist then OJ is a murderer correct?
He was sentenced to 33 years and served 9 years.
Some justice system...
God is his judge now.
After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point. Despite Carroll's claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense.
Using the standard of low intelligence leftists. Trump was never criminally convicted of rape and leftists call him a rapist because of the civil suit. If it's true that trumps a rapist then OJ is a murderer correct?
In my opinion, both are true. In the civil courts both are true.
In the criminal court neither are true yet.
You see, in this world there are different standards, the United States has a very high standard for Criminal culpability, and lower standards for other types of convictions. Individuals opinions have a standard set internally.
Less intelligent people often cannot see anything but black and white, but the world is full of grey.
In my opinion, Trump is a rapist and O.J. is a murderer. Do you agree?
I call Trump a rapist based on the evidence and my knowledge of his character.
Knowledge of one's character is not generally admissible in court and not generally a permissible reason in court to make findings.
I call OJ a murderer because he murdered his ex wife. With trump you me given me no reason to think you leftists actually care whether he's actually a rapist or not.
I call OJ a murderer because he murdered his ex wife. With trump you me given me no reason to think you leftists actually care whether he's actually a rapist or not.
I called Trump a rapist because he raped E Jean Carrol.
So, you believe people can be guilty before or without being proven guilty in a court of law?
What about all of Traitor Trump’s other crimes, Yak. Is he 100% Not Guilty in each of those too? Even the ones he’s admitted to committing?I call OJ a murderer because he murdered his ex wife. With trump you me given me no reason to think you leftists actually care whether he's actually a rapist or not.
I thought it was never recovered.He still had to pay a huge judgement.
They did, as described by NY law, in other states what they found him guilty of would have been rape.
In the vernacular what he was found guilty of is considered rape by most people. They found him guilty of inserting a body part into her vagina against her will.
If a man holds a woman down and shoves any body part into her vagina against her will, what do you call it?
I thought it was never recovered.