If you say black people are "fooled" into voting dem you are a racist.
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
I'm Watermark
Diabetic
You're right. Because African-Americans turned out in large numbers for you guys.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You know how gals get, when they feel they're not getting attention.
They start lying?
Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
Great post. Cheers.
This was a Fox News driven movement and the sheeple repeat it. The problem is that some people can't envision things. Let me repeat that, because this is a HUGE importance in politics. Some people can't envision things beyond their own perspective. Some people can't even envision how a room will look with furniture situated a different way without moving it and require to move it to see the results. Others can get that mental picture of what it is like to be in the aftermath of a Hurricane and hope that the rest of America cares.
Envision yourself as an honest black man/woman trying to tell America that you are a responsible person. Imagine the uncomfortable looks you get from racists that lump you into that statistic of black crime. Imagine that response you get when you can't swim.....because your ancestors weren't allowed in pools..
I know this won't happen. As Newt Gingrich would say, "Only envision yourself in the skin of prosperity"......................
Now ask them what actions they are going to take to stop the black violence .................."This isn't the job of Government"
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
And from the way you talk on here, you have never had one and will never have one.
Lil' chick needed a big strong man to protect her. Unfortunately, Grind was the only one interested, so she thanked him anyway.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You want to see her head explode, use the word "cunt" and watch the fireworks.
cawacko
Well-known member
We need to have a drinking game for every time Anti-Party says Fox News. This is my favorite type of game because we get to drink a lot as he uses it in almost every post. There will be a lot of drunk posting on JPP.
It heavily influences the right.
cawacko
Well-known member
Yes, there was no right in this country prior to October 1996.
Today, Cawacko, today.
Drinking?
Yes, drinking influences the right on here as well.
poet
Banned
I'm saying just like you don't have the right to shout fire, in crowded theater, you cannot insult an entire group of
people, in a public setting, and not expect someone to knock your lights out. I know I would.
You presented no truths. Opinions aren't truths. Goober? That sounds like the white character on Mayberry, RFD.
I'm black and gay, and not afraid of you.
Robo
Verified User
Well then Goober you deny that the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus and the United Negro College Fund are “race specific” and “separatist” and anti-integration” institutions and telling the truth that they are all of that is “insulting an entire group of people?” In your world truth is insult. Then you wonder why I refer to you as “Goober?” You even attempt to make a “racial and separatist” inference about the name Goober. Actually Goober, that name could be relevant to a person of any skin color. I personally never noticed Goober’s skin color I only notice his moronic lack of rationality.
If you want to kick my ass Goober, come a shootin!
Well maybe that’s because I’ve never threatened you Goober. You have no reason to fear me. I don’t fear you either Goober even though you associate and talk a lot about ass kickin. You’ve even incorporated it into your signature. You only seek to prove that blacks are violent folks who commit most violent crimes. Thankfully all blacks are not like you and the majority of your race.
BTW, why did you think I needed to know you were gay? Why should I give a flying fuck about your sexual orientation and what does it have to do with your racism and separatist ideology?
poet
Banned
Gurrllll, please. Deny? It's not even up for discussion. How do you like that? Stopping you in mid-flight. Truth?
And some names are particular to certain groups, and/or races. You won't find any black folks named, Biff, Buffy, Sammie Jo, Dolly, Muffy, or Goober. Sorry.
And since you can't be respectful and address me by my ID, this will be my last engagement of you, because you're less than zero, and beneath me.
Any references to black folks committing more crimes than white folks, and them being more violent, are bald faced lies and made up statistics, to paint black people with a broad negative lying brush.
I referred to my sexual orientation to remind the board that it is a gay black man, "kicking your ass", literally and figuratively, succinctly, and decisively, all across this board.
You try to portray yourself as such a man, when you couldn't be more of a pussy. And I merely sought to illustrate that point. Now that it's done, I have no more need for you. Find a rock, and remain there, until someone sends for you.
poet
Banned
And to the point:
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/23/the_rights_obsession_with_black_crime/
There are a few black people up to no good in this country and Fox News is on it! So is Drudge Report. Vigilantly on the lookout, 24 hours a day, for stories about black youths behaving badly.
This isn’t a particularly new phenomenon, but it’s intensified noticeably in the past year for at least two reasons. Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, feel a burning urgency to find a racial counterweight to the aftermath of Trayvon Martin’s shooting (including President Obama’s public comments about the incident), a logical response to the argument that things like background checks and an assault weapons ban are appropriate ways to reduce the likelihood of another Sandy Hook-style massacre, and anecdotal justifications for indiscriminate policing of dangerous neighborhoods.
But these are hopeless pursuits. The incidents they draw attention to fail by definition to underscore the things they believe. They all require projecting motives or details or both into tragic events, to create false dichotomies between shootings perpetrated by whites and blacks. They have the unhealthy effect of creating dueling tallies of white-on-black and black-on-white crime. And ironically they all tend to underscore the argument that more “stand your ground” laws and more racial profiling are off-point responses to these incidents...........
the point, the events don’t even anecdotally augur for policies the right supports. The kids in Oklahoma weren’t “standing their ground,” and a “stand your ground” law wouldn’t have saved Chris Lane. Neither would a stop-and-frisk regime — the killers were trailing him in a car. By contrast, a “stand your ground” environment and a stop-and-frisk mentality were instrumental in Trayvon Martin’s death. Take either away, and there’s a good chance he’d be alive today. Martin in fact personified the statistical folly of stop-and-frisk. If Zimmerman had yielded to real police, they would have, in absence of any suspicious behavior, stopped Martin, frisked him and found only the skittles and iced tea that made his death that much more tragically poignant.
You could twist that into a claim that stop-and-frisk might have saved Martin’s life. But that gets the onus backward. Proponents of profiling policies need to do better than argue we have to violate the civil rights of minorities in order to protect them from hair-triggered vigilantes.
What might well have stopped both killings, though, is making it harder for people, legally or illegally, to come into possession of handguns. That’s a conversation the right is less obsessed with.
And there you have it.
http://www.salon.com/2013/08/23/the_rights_obsession_with_black_crime/
There are a few black people up to no good in this country and Fox News is on it! So is Drudge Report. Vigilantly on the lookout, 24 hours a day, for stories about black youths behaving badly.
This isn’t a particularly new phenomenon, but it’s intensified noticeably in the past year for at least two reasons. Conservatives, particularly white conservatives, feel a burning urgency to find a racial counterweight to the aftermath of Trayvon Martin’s shooting (including President Obama’s public comments about the incident), a logical response to the argument that things like background checks and an assault weapons ban are appropriate ways to reduce the likelihood of another Sandy Hook-style massacre, and anecdotal justifications for indiscriminate policing of dangerous neighborhoods.
But these are hopeless pursuits. The incidents they draw attention to fail by definition to underscore the things they believe. They all require projecting motives or details or both into tragic events, to create false dichotomies between shootings perpetrated by whites and blacks. They have the unhealthy effect of creating dueling tallies of white-on-black and black-on-white crime. And ironically they all tend to underscore the argument that more “stand your ground” laws and more racial profiling are off-point responses to these incidents...........
the point, the events don’t even anecdotally augur for policies the right supports. The kids in Oklahoma weren’t “standing their ground,” and a “stand your ground” law wouldn’t have saved Chris Lane. Neither would a stop-and-frisk regime — the killers were trailing him in a car. By contrast, a “stand your ground” environment and a stop-and-frisk mentality were instrumental in Trayvon Martin’s death. Take either away, and there’s a good chance he’d be alive today. Martin in fact personified the statistical folly of stop-and-frisk. If Zimmerman had yielded to real police, they would have, in absence of any suspicious behavior, stopped Martin, frisked him and found only the skittles and iced tea that made his death that much more tragically poignant.
You could twist that into a claim that stop-and-frisk might have saved Martin’s life. But that gets the onus backward. Proponents of profiling policies need to do better than argue we have to violate the civil rights of minorities in order to protect them from hair-triggered vigilantes.
What might well have stopped both killings, though, is making it harder for people, legally or illegally, to come into possession of handguns. That’s a conversation the right is less obsessed with.
And there you have it.
tekkychick
New member
That's a great article, Poet. Thanks for posting the link to it.