ORDER
verb
1. give an authoritative direction or instruction to do something.
"she ordered me to leave"
synonyms: instruct, command, direct, enjoin, tell, require, charge
NYT: Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened
- Thread starter Nomad
- Start date
ORDER
verb
1. give an authoritative direction or instruction to do something.
"she ordered me to leave"
synonyms: instruct, command, direct, enjoin, tell, require, charge
so where is the attempt?
If Trump administration had ATTEMPTED any CORRUPT action -you'd be on to something..They didn't -you don't..
Trump ordering a cheeseburger and firing Mueller doesn't make either an attempt
if nobody went to McDonalds or attempted the firing
but there was no attempt to do the order. nothing was done, there was no action..
Trump orders up a cheeseburger
his staff talks him out of it
there was no order for a cheeseburger
your track record is less then stellar ..
You were going with CFR violations that Trump Jr. "solicited" the meeting with Russians..
there wasn't any solicitation there either.
Ordering that Mueller be fired, depending on the reason would clearly be an attempt.
Put it like this, If a Mob boss ordered that Lefty kill Bugsey, but Lefty decided not to do it... The Mob Boss still endeavored to have Bugsey killed.
If Trump orders a cheeseburger, but the staff refuses to get it for him.... Did Trump still order the burger?
Trump did not order the cheeseburger because staff objected.. there was nothing to get, because it wasn't ordered
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
The dishonest Jarod edits his post so he doesn't look like a retard. Thus is what he originally wrote and then after I schooled him, he edited his post:
Most crimes can be attempt crimes, there are not separate statutes for it.
And the fool cites a separate statutes to prove his point.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Poor Dumber
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Cite, you're a known liar.
Lefty orders Bugsey to commit act, Bugsey objects and talks Left out of it. there was no order to kill because Bugsey talked him out.
did you ever see those undercover stings? The undercover cop tries to talk the guy out of ordering the hit.
The guy ordering the hit still wants the hit and pays the money.. that's a crime.
But if the undercover cop were to talk him out of the hit, then the guy ordering the hit would not have a contract
to hit the target with the cop..no crime..
++
Besides POTUS ordering the firing is not an illegal act in itself, as it's it's purview ( unlike a contract )
there has to be a corrupted action/attempted or successful by POTUS
Ordering a hamburger? REALLY? lol
The law on soliciting is clear and Junior's actions were clear. By email and action.
He invited/asked/solicited foreign agents TO HIS HOUSE for the express purpose of obtaining dirt on Clinton. They required security clearance to even get in the building. Who do you think arranged that?
Twist it and distort i any way you wish. Those are the facts.
Last edited:
Notice it is a SEPERATE statute
But I am not wrong!
OMG
the solicitation was done by the da Russians. Junior accepted the invitation..where is Juniors solicitation?
Junior accepted the offer to meet only - but there was no collusion coming out of the meeting either.
no solicitation, no collusion in either case.
The dishonest Jarod edits his post so he doesn't look like a retard. Thus is what he originally wrote and then after I schooled him, he edited his post:
Most crimes can be attempt crimes, there are not separate statutes for it.
And the fool cites a separate statutes to prove his point.
777.04 Attempts, solicitation, and conspiracy.—
(1) A person who attempts to commit an offense prohibited by law and in such attempt does any act toward the commission of such offense, but fails in the perpetration or is intercepted or prevented in the execution thereof, commits the offense of criminal attempt, ranked for purposes of sentencing as provided in subsection (4). Criminal attempt includes the act of an adult who, with intent to commit an offense prohibited by law, allures, seduces, coaxes, or induces a child under the age of 12 to engage in an offense prohibited by law.
I was not incorrect, you were.
While you may hope and pray and really really badly want that to be the scenario, its not what the article said happened.
Fake News doesn't even try to use a legal analysis.. they put up some clowns for their opinions -
but never break it down to show the corrupted order ( because there was none)
The ACT of giving order itself was the ACTion, numbskull.
The obstruction was committed by Trump giving the order.
Welcome to Trumptardland, folks.
Trump gives an order, but there was no order.
