O.J. Simpson dies of cancer at age 76

Nomad said:
I say they were racist.

You say they weren't.

Rather than just leave it at that, you accuse me of racism for having an opinion you don't agree with.

Now who’s being racist here?

Don't answer.

It's YOU.
Click to expand...

Don’t lump my friend


We all have moments where we need to peal away scum that some racist relative planted in our little brains


Just peal it


No harm or shame in learning
 
domer76 said:
After many years of testifying in criminal trials, I have never questioned a jury’s verdict. I believe they take their duty very seriously and do the best they can given the evidence presented them. That is, until this trial.

This is the only case I can recall where I did. They simply didn’t do their duty to deliberate - to consider all the evidence. This was a long and complex trial. Deliberation should have taken days or weeks or longer. They hardly had time to choose a foreman and eat lunch. It took LESS THAN FOUR HOURS.

So, was there a racist underpinning? Sure appears to be.
Click to expand...

I think the police malfeasance was sufficiently blatant that the defendant had to be acquitted regardless of what the legitimate evidence suggested.
Four hours was plenty.

I've served on juries.
I don't share your confidence in them.
If I were innocent, I'd want a judge's verdict.
The judge went to law school and knows what he/she is doing..
I'd only opt for a jury trial if I were guilty hoping for a jury mistake.

In this case, however, I think the police sabotaged their own case enough to give the jury an easy job.
 
The Red Hot Chili Peppers came out in 1991 with the tune Under the Bridge


Some the lyrics in that tune viscerally take me back to the beating of Rodney King and then the OJ trial


I dont ever want to feel like I felt that day


Take me back to the place I love


Take me all the way
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I think the police malfeasance was sufficiently blatant that the defendant had to be acquitted regardless of what the legitimate evidence suggested.
Four hours was plenty.

I've served on juries.
I don't share your confidence in them.
If I were innocent, I'd want a judge's verdict.
The judge went to law school and knows what he/she is doing..
I'd only opt for a jury trial if I were guilty hoping for a jury mistake.

In this case, however, I think the police sabotaged their own case enough to give the jury an easy job.
Click to expand...

The science was perfectly sound

This poster doesn’t know the real facts
 
evince said:
Don’t lump my friend


We all have moments where we need to peal away scum that some racist relative planted in our little brains


Just peal it


No harm or shame in learning
Click to expand...

You insinuate constantly that black people are all perfect, innocent angels who cannot have the same human faults that everyone else has.

That is 1) absurd and 2) racist.

If I was black I'd be offended by people like you.

Seriously.

As if I would need your coddling.

Absolutely sickening.
 
Nomad said:
You insinuate constantly that black people are all perfect, innocent angels who cannot have the same human faults that everyone else has.

That is 1) absurd and 2) racist.

If I was black I'd be offended by people like you.

Seriously.

As if I need your coddling.

Absolutely sickening.
Click to expand...

I know it hurts


Take some time


Think it through
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I think the police malfeasance was sufficiently blatant that the defendant had to be acquitted regardless of what the legitimate evidence suggested.
Four hours was plenty.

I've served on juries.
I don't share your confidence in them.
If I were innocent, I'd want a judge's verdict.
The judge went to law school and knows what he/she is doing..
I'd only opt for a jury trial if I were guilty hoping for a jury mistake.

In this case, however, I think the police sabotaged their own case enough to give the jury an easy job.
Click to expand...

No doubt one uses a jury if you’re guilty.

And yeah, there were a lot of fuckups by the cops, the prosecution, and even the judge. But, 3 hours and change? Naw
 
domer76 said:
No doubt one uses a jury if you’re guilty.

And yeah, there were a lot of fuckups by the cops, the prosecution, and even the judge. But, 3 hours and change? Naw
Click to expand...

Deliberation was admittedly short. But how long was sequester?
These people weren't going to take more time than they needed.
Hotel food is good, but at some point, you just want to get the fuck home, no?
 
Here is a hint


I look at a person and make my self face that no matter how they physically present in front of me


As in wheelchair bound with a cleft lip



Inside they are as intelligent, loving and interesting as I feel my insides are


I had to teach myself that practice as I did have racist relatives who smeared scum on my insides


That is how I peal away the scum


Now once I have enough interaction with that one individual to deem them not worthy of my good graces I can chose to find them unworthy of further contact

I have to use the same process with their identical wheelchair bound twin or triplet


Get it



No lumping
 
When you find it inside you


Scrape it the fuck out


Dont insist everyone else see it as truth



You are harming you
 
I have had to scrape it out


I know how it feels


It’s icky


It’s humiliating


But once you scrape that scum some fool left in you thinking they were making you wiser



Man does it feel better


Your thoughts and feeling begin to actually get more in tune with that feeling of decency you get when you help someone who needs a hand


Scrape it out dudes


It’s easier Than you think it will be
 
Those twelve people wanted justice


I truly believe they were trying to be fair and just


They wanted justice to win the day


They were slipped the equivalent of “covid isn’t real”
 
evince said:
That is one of the eight idiot


He thought he just made progress for black rights


Perfectly legal and understandable if you believe you just returned some justice to the world

Not a fucking thing wrong with what he did
Click to expand...

Letting a killer go just to get back at whitey is OK?....got it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top