Arks&sparka
Verified User
Show the evidence. And by the way, he was qualified both by education and experience to be a lobbyist.
No. Believe you candidate is the Messiah. It's better that way.
Show the evidence. And by the way, he was qualified both by education and experience to be a lobbyist.
Of course there is...using money allocated by Congress to extract political favors.
What would you call it?
It must really have hurt!
Makes my day.
And I suppose you think there are no differences between agnostics and atheists???
C'mon. Don't make it easy for me.
Show me specifically in the transcript where he said you will not get this money unless you do a favor for me.
right. atheists are definitely tools of evil. whereas agnostics are just young or compulsive fence sitters because they think that indicates intelligence.
Well, the House voted to Impeach, and the GOP voted to acquit.
Except for the "though".
What were they talking about right before he asked for that favor, Mr. "I've Read the Transcript"?
It depends. Biden is an excellent example of a "Yes" answer.You think it's the President's job to get other countries to investigate US citizens?
Nope. Zalenskyy cleared that up in a jiffy.And yes, it was extortion:
TrumppersLiberals have no dignity.
They make up all kinds of shit for their man, only to find he will admit the opposite readily when it serves him.
Biden did that though. That idiot even boasted about it. And when he got caught he tried to blame Trump for what he did.
Zalenskyy can have any person investigated in Ukraine. I shouldn't have to teach you this.Well Biden is a US citizen, so....
But those prerequisites weren't in the legislation. They appeared afterwards, ad-hoc, and then were quickly abandoned once the whistleblower went public.
Had there been no whistleblower, the aid would have never gotten there or Zalensky would have announced a fake investigation into Biden.
What's obvious is that you have no fucking idea what you're talking about, and if I were to hold what you're saying to greater scrutiny, you would abandon the thread or devolve it to something boring.
Show me where in the Constitution it says the President can hold up aid to a foreign country unless they do him a favor?
OK, so now you're going to step in it.
How does getting Zalensky to announce an investigation into a US citizen help the federal government?
Why isn't the federal government doing that investigation?
Why outsource it to Ukraine?
Show the evidence. And by the way, he was qualified both by education and experience to be a lobbyist.
"I would like you to do us a favor, though..."
Joe Biden bragged about it.There is no evidence Biden strongarmed anyone into doing anything for his family.
Nope. Zalenskyy gave Trump an air-tight alibi on that.There is evidence that Trump strongarmed Zalensky into doing something for him, though...
Trumppers have no dignity.
They make up all kinds of shit for their man, only to find he will admit the opposite readily when it serves him.
Show the evidence. And by the way, he was qualified both by education and experience to be a lobbyist.
The argument he was making was that agnostics weren't atheist. Meaning her thinks they are theists.
Just ask, although I shouldn't have to teach you this.OK, so show us the regulation. Go ahead. What are you waiting for?
There is ZERO executive authority in Congress. Congress decides that there is money for aid to Ukraine. The President EXECUTES that law, including building the timetable (OMB).US Constitution, Article. II., Section. 1.
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
Now it's your turn: Show me this supposedly Congressionally-mandated timetable for delivery of those funds to Ukraine.No. No no no. You are wrong. He does not control the process.
right. atheists are definitely tools of evil. whereas agnostics are just young or compulsive fence sitters because they think that indicates intelligence.