Is this the Hunter laptop that prosecutors say they are not using any information from it in his trial?
The laptop exists. The data on the laptop can not be confirmed well enough to be used in a court of law.
RUH ROH - Trump Lynching in Trouble.
- Thread starter Uncensored2008
- Start date
The laptop exists. The data on the laptop can not be confirmed well enough to be used in a court of law.
The FBI confirmed in a court of law not two weeks ago that the Laptop belongs to Hunter Biden and there is no evidence it was ever tampered with.
And STILL you continue lying.,
You Stalinists truly believe there is no issue so big that it can't be lied into oblivion.
As I said in the OP - this may go nowhere - but the little Goebbels of Politico having a tantrum and screaming "NUHN UHN" doesn't mean anything.
Take a hike, pendejo.
Pobre isn't too bright or informed.
LOL. No. They didn't confirm it hasn't been tampered with. They said the laptop serial number matched one that Hunter Biden had registered to his iCloud account. The FBI agent who was not a qualified computer expert, had done no analysis of the computer itself and only joined the case last year testified she had seen no evidence of it being tampered with. That is not the same thing as no evidence it was ever tampered with. It means someone that is unqualified testified they didn't see evidence. It would be like you testifying that you don't see evidence of Trump having early signs of dementia.
Prosecutors in their court filings stated that nothing they are using in court came from the laptop but instead came from Hunter's iCloud account.
Last edited:
I already took my morning hike. How about you? Just sitting on your ass all day again trying to pretend you aren't as stupid as you know you are.
Exact testimony "There is no evidence that the data contained on the hard drive was tampered with."
The laptop is confirmed. Your filthy fascist party and the little Goebbels of the DNC press lied, and lied, and lied - with 51 DNC thugs lying.
This is why no one believes anything from you - or any democrat, or any of the little Goebbels of the democrat press.
Which was automatically backed up from the harddrive.
The reason for using it was to thwart lies by you Stalinists of tampering. The laptop is fully verified - you lying is irrelevant,
The point of course is that only fool would accept a "NUHN UHN" from the party press on a Saturday when no new information was to be had. WE know the party press lies about everything. The juror may turn out to be nothing, or may torpedo the lynching - we simply don't know.
We will know soon - or maybe not.
NakedHunterBiden
“It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown”
God I love this for the maga morons!
What will you Stalinist simpletons do if this sinks your lynching? There would be wailing and gnashing of teeth...
NakedHunterBiden
“It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown”
This has already been debunked. But please do continue so I can laugh some more.
They will probably try to sink Hunter's lynching.
Why is Biden's justice department prosecuting Hunter in the first place, I though Biden was abusing the justice system ?
Poor Pobre, that’s redundant…that’s redundant, isn’t too bright and you proved him 100% wrong on the laptop.
He should try to inform himself instead of taking hikes…and lying.
They wouldn’t be prosecuting Cocaine Hunter except a judge shot the sweetheart deal down in flames.
Try to keep up, receptionist.
Just like Hunter's laptop.
A Party propaganda outlet saying "nuhn uhn" based on zero evidence just isn't convincing.
As I have stated from the start - though you are far too dull witted to follow along, IF this is as it seems, if will be bad news for the lynching. We don't know yet, Politico has no more information than I do - they are just flinging shit to try an cover up - which is what the little Goebbels of the party press do. The Court, and only the Court, will make a determination.
Current prosecutions:
Menendez (D)
Cuellar (D)
Hunter Biden (D)
Donald Trump (R)
Matt Gaetz (R) charges dismissed
Garland did all he could to stop prosecution - but was exposed.
It amusing that you try and spin this as upholding the law - after all the corruption the DOJ has engaged in to bury this.
So, the "crooked" Justice Department with the double standard chose to prosecute the president's son?
What did Garland do to stop prosecution? And, who exposed him? Link?
Did Garland stop the prosecution of Gaetz?
From FOX 10 Phoenix:
Note the passage: "The profile for "Michael Anderson" has little publicly available information, but the user identifies himself as a "Transabled & professional sh-- poster."
https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/trump-juror-facebook-post
Hmmmmmmmmm.......
It's fascinating watching Trump haters flail.