Talk about a regurgitation of talk radio rhetoric
Fist off, there is no “probably,” Obama doesn’t live at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, hasn’t for nearly eight years now, a fact
The fact is that Obama runs the shadow government behind Bought and Paid for Biden, a fact.
Second, did Trump do his best thru encouragement and scheme to stop the Constitutional transfer of power on and up to 1/6? One would have to drunk on the Kool Aid to think he wouldn’t do the same in 2028, especially since he’ll have the power of the Government and four years to plan another “peaceful protest”
Again, democrats sent Brown Shirts to burn, murder, loot, and rape from coast to coast for over a year prior to the 2020 election, including the armed invasion and occupation of Seattle Washington. Yet I should be concerned with a 3 hour protest with some minor rioting where the only deaths were protesters, including one murdered by a BLM affiliated CPO.
Third, seeing you want to deal in ancient history,
2016 is "ancient history?"
ROFL
those three or four phrases, not sentences or complete thoughts, but phrases, of Paige and Strzok texts and Emails were pulled from over 5,000+ texts and Emails. Once again, a half of dozen phrases, some as short as two words, were picked from over 5,000+ texts and Emails. Get the point or does it have to be explained to you
They are texts and mere examples of the coup that was staged by the top echelons of the STASI (formerly FBI), NSA, and CIA.
And lastly, the Trump campaign was working with the Russians,
That is a fucking lie - as even Weissman, ghost writing for the debilitated Mueller stated.
{The Office considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy-either under statutes that have their own conspiracy language (e.g. , 18 U.S.C. §§ 1349, 195l(a)), or under the general conspiracy statute (18 U.S.C. § 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law- including foreign-fnfluence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either under a specific statute or under Section 371 's offenses clause. The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under Section 371 's defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a lawful function of the U.S. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 861 (1966); Hammerschmidt v. United States, 265 U.S. 182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Concord Mgmt. & Consulting LLC, 34 7 F. Supp. 3d 38, 46 (D.D.C.2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officialsor between such officials and Russia-linked individuals-to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume I, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume I, Section II, supra. Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other U.S. person with conspiracy }
there were over two hundred direct contacts documented in the Mueller Report between Russians and the Trump campaign, that is documented, not something Sean or Billy Barr said, but actually documented, you really didn’t think that meeting in Trump Tower was really about adoptions did you
{The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume I, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal criminal law- including foreign-Influence and campaign-finance laws}
Your conspiracy theory and attempted coup failed - but it was certainly treason - no matter how we cut it.
Which goes back to the question, WILL Obama relinquish power in January 2025? His trained monkey Biden already said he would "never allow Donald Trump to assume the presidency." That sounds like the party will refuse the peaceful transition of power.