anonymoose
Classical Liberal
. U.S. Deficit, Pegged at $1.7 Trillion, Effectively Doubled in 2023
www.NYTimes.com
This is not good. No good at all.
Last edited:
The U.S. national debt exceeded $33 trillion for the first time ever
- Thread starter ptif219
- Start date
www.NYTimes.com
This is not good. No good at all.
Not one success at all. You can't even point to "capitalism" because you fuck that up...S&L bailouts at the end of Reagan, a recession at the end of Bush the Elder, TWO recessions during Bush the Dumber, and a Trump recession that started the month before COVID lockdowns.
I can totally get why you won't defend your policy; it fails every time it's tried.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Indeed but I think I’m prepared, at least better than most. I’ve been seeing this coming for a while.
Wait - it's given by force to people? You're not making any sense. You're flaming out because you ran out of ways to defend yourself.
Then what is Medicare reimbursing providers for?
Not sure how you got that from my question so I'll ask it again since you're deflecting and dodging: Do you know what pay-go means, because I don't believe you do.
But how does it undermine itself? Do you know what "undermine" means? Or are you just repeating that word like a mantra because I used it effectively against you, so you thought you could copy me?
LMAO! So now that you're caught your strategy is now to parse out a game of semantics rather than just admitting you're wrong.
Yes they do, it's in the Constitution. The part where the executive signs and executes all laws.
Otherwise, show me where in the Constitution it says a bill can be enacted into law without a President's signature or an overriding of their veto?
And no, you can't use RQAA because you've never explained it before...for obvious reasons.
You've never read the Constitution because if you had, you'd know how a bill becomes a law.
NO! Congress writes laws, the EXECUTIVE BRANCH executes them.
The Omnibus Budget is a bill that has to be voted on and then executed by the President in order to become law.
You are now lying about this because you are too lazy to learn anything about it.
I know it's not a policy, which is what I've been saying this entire time.
The problem is that Conservatives can't think of any policies because you're not smart enough to have any good ideas.
Did you plan on currency going away and it being illegal to barter or use precious metals as a means for payment as you are watched 24/7? It might be even worse, remember that the WEF/CCP promise is that you will own nothing and you will be happy.
China put tariffs in place on the US soybean exports in retaliation and that's why we had to spend $30B to bail out those farmers.
China to this day has not paid ONE SINGLE CENT in tariffs because China doesn't pay tariffs, importers do. And those importers are almost all domestic. And they pass the cost of those tariffs onto us.
Nope, that is entirely 100% true.
Trump lost 300,000 manufacturing jobs in 2019 and we ended up spending $30B to bail out the MAGA farmers who thought that tariffs would be a good idea.
No there isn't. You're lying again. There are currently 221 Republicans and 212 Democrats. 0 Independents.
Incorrect, US farmers are the ones who pay the tariffs in China, that's why they all fuckin' failed.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
This is a stupid statement; it says nothing beyond you not knowing what capitalism is. It would have been much easier, quicker for you to write "I hate conservatives, although I don't know what that means exactly."
This is another mindless quip, packaged for regurgitation by those who've had it reamed into them when they were bent over furniture by their slave-masters. It doesn't say anything other than "I hate conservatives, although I don't know what means that exactly."
The only way for this to be accurate is for you to be operating under your own hijacked definition of "success." If you were to explain the definition you are using, i.e. converted the earth into a Utopian Dyson sphere that will have virtually limitless resources for tens of billions of years to come and transformed humanity genetically to live, on average, six-hundred year lifespans, ... it would become readily apparent that no human has ever had any success by your definition that was contrived just to express "I hate conservatives, although I don't know what that means exactly."
... and then you mistake leftists for conservatives and bash them in your signature. Too funny.
Then you take great pride in your inability to distinguish between different users. Way too funny.
Say it with me: "I hate conservatives, although I don't know what that means exactly."
... one more time: "I hate conservatives, although I don't know what that means exactly."
Of course you see it this way. You don't know what capitalism is. How embarrassing.
This has only become the case since the DNC took over the RNC. Republicans aren't conservative anymore.
That's not an inversion fallacy. IN fact, what you're doing here is an inversion fallacy. Also, neither you or he have bothered to explain anything thoroughly enough for you to invoke RQAA.
You seem to think China pays tariffs on their products but they don't, and that's because you don't know what a tariff is and who actually pays them.
So you don't think corporations should be as profitable as possible?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
There is one libertarian who is registered Republican. It's like the word "conservative." It doesn't necessarily refer to a political party.
Not one single Conservative policy that you can point to as a success.
Every time you get power, you end up fucking up the economy.
Every time.
It just happened with Trump, but it also happened with Bush the Dumber, Bush the Elder, Reagan, Ford, and Nixon.
Failure after failure after failure.
You can't even think of ONE LAW Conservatives passed that actually succeeded.
Fucking losers.
All I see is you scrambling to get the microscope off your constant and inevitable failures.
NOT ONE SINGLE POLICY SUCCESS.
Nothing, Nothing to run on. You can't even run on capitalism because every single time you get power we end up with an economic collapse.
Worthless losers.
If you don't understand what success means, then you've never known it.
The debt doesn't matter.
The debt is merely a scorecard of government spending.
So we spent $30T but we have things to show for it like a military, or Medicare, or Social Security...but we don't have things to show for tax cuts. Well, we do have one thing to show for tax cuts: debt.
Every single time taxes have been cut or lowered the last 43 years, household debt has increased and personal savings have decreased.
The dogma is believing that lower taxes somehow unleash economic growth despite the fact that we have 43 years of data that prove the opposite.
So what? It's not like any bondholder is going to show up at Congress with a gun to the head of Yellowstone National Park if they don't get their bond payment.