anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Which would backfire.
Three ways for the Jury to convict Trump
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
Nothing worked against Clinton. In fact his poll numbers were better after his impeachment. I see the same thing happening with Trump.
Nothing will dissuade a trumpet, he can shoot someone on 5th ave, and they would support him.
anonymoose
Classical Liberal
The left has been going after Trump since before he was inaugurated continuously . You’re don’t think people are getting numb to it?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
not if it let's the jury make up the underlying crime....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
ironically demmycrats have been trying to shoot Trump on the streets of NY for seven years and they're still cheering each other on.......
They won't because the prosecution never told them what felony was committed to resurrect this nonsensical trial.
What evidence? The salacious Stormy testimony which once again she perjured herself with?
There was no evidence of a crime presented nor did the DA tell anyone what the felony crime was.
There was no evidence other than Cohen said so. There was no presentation of what felony Trump had to have committed.
Wishful thinking from a partisan hack.
How did they prove beyond a reasonable doubt when they presented no evidence of the crime nor state what it was?
I would be surprised if you knew what it was you are emotionally babbling about.
Cue the whining and crying from the left.
Triggered delusional loon. I cannot imagine how triggered and emotionally unsound NiftyNitWit will become with Trumps re-election.
Fairness? There was no fairness by this corrupt partisan jurist. That is why they know anything they do in this clown court will easily be overturned. Marchan didn't even allow the expert FEC witness. He censured another defense witness that destroyed Cohens lie filled narrative.
Everything this jurist did was anti-Constitutional and unfair.
There is zero legal precedence with this clown show. Saying there is is merely evidence of your complete ignorance of the law or your utter dishonesty bloviating about things you know nothing about which is standard MO for you.
Who threatened the jury? How was it tainted?
Why, because you say so? Try to form a coherent argument if that is even possible.
Well, that may be the case because they certainly didn't prove any crime had been committed or tell us what crime Trump is guilty of.
What laws has Trump broken and been convicted of?
Right after you tell us what crime was committed making accounting transactions felonies.
No, it is not. It is a misdemeanor whose statute of limitations have run out.
Lying makes for very bad arguments.
"Former President Donald Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, according to a grand jury indictment released Tuesday.
"The crime of falsifying business records is included in New York’s penal code. Falsifying records in the second degree is a misdemeanor, but it becomes a felony if the person falsified business records with an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission of a crime."
The Trump indictment: What the charges mean and what's next
Donald Trump has achieved many firsts. The first president to be impeached twice. The first president to inspire a riotwww.politifact.com
Per that bolded part; what other crime was there or crime that was concealed?
This is why it is hard to argue with uneducated and uninformed partisan hacks that only know how to parrot MSNBC talking points.
The correct verdict is not guilty. The possible verdict is a hung jury.
Leftist losers still parrot the moronic bullshit they are fed by the DNC.