Trump Admits Collusion

Bigdog said:
the president tweeted. "This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics – and it went nowhere. I did not know about it!" ( Trump Tweet)

:dunno:
Click to expand...


You caught trump's tweet as if there's some sort of value to it. The guy is a liar and we all know that. The fact that you quoted as if it means something just says a lot about what kind of person you are
 
Micawber said:
" didn't use false information to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on a political opponent during an election."

Factually false, too vague, lacks knowledge, lacks causation, lacks intent.

That's why they call him "Forgettingeverything"
Click to expand...

your being stupid or in denial does not change facts, please don't forget that

using false information to obtain a FISA warrant to spy is "vague", "lacks knowledge" "lacks intent"?
are you really this^^^^ stupid

you just think of the biggest words you know and type them, thinking it may sound coherent

you can't fix stupid, and I'm not going to try
 
Lesh said:
In a tweet this morning, Trump admitted that the infamous Trump Tower meeting with Russian agents WAS about getting information damaging to his political opponent from a foreign power.

He had written a statement saying the meeting was about adoption policies so we now know that was a lie.

He claims that this collusion meeting was legal. It was not.

He claims he did not know about the meeting in advance. Considering the lies he has already told about this meeting...there is no reason to believe that claim.

At the very least he just threw his son and son in law under the bus
Click to expand...

No link, no facts and zero intelligence. I am calling BULL SHIT on this one of course. Cry harder snowflake.

giphy.gif
 
moon said:
He meant to say ' Didn't collude '. These vicious attacks on American dyslexics must cease.
Click to expand...

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence included Germany, Estonia and Poland ... Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.

It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.
. . . .

The Guardian has been told the FBI and the CIA were slow to appreciate the extensive nature of contacts between Trump’s team and Moscow ahead of the US election. This was in part due to US law that prohibits US agencies from examining the private communications of American citizens without warrants. “They are trained not to do this,” the source stressed.

“It looks like the [US] agencies were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying: ‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’

“The message was: ‘Watch out. There’s something not right here.’”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia
 
Jarod said:
Why is it so important to him that we think he did not know about it?
Click to expand...

Why do you moronically think the meeting was so important? It is a NOTHING BURGER.

Why don't you think the Hillary camps purchase of Russian information in a FAKE dossier isn't important?
 
Tump is hanging his Jr. out to dry, he admitted his son is guilty of illegal collusion, and in the same Tweet denies he himself was a part of it.


Classic
 
Darth Omar said:
Collusion requires the mutual cooperation of at least two parties.

What did they cooperate on? And where is your evidence they did?
Click to expand...

The meeting itself was a clear conspiracy to violate 11 USC 110.20(b) and 11 USC 110.20(g)
 
Jarod said:
Last week they changed the narrative to say that Collusion is not a crime.... Yesterday the president admits there was collusion.

What do you think the grand plan is here, clearly they dont care about the truth, but only lying.
Click to expand...

Let's see how many times the losers on the left have changed the narrative; first it was collusion, then it was illegal contributions, then it was corruption, now it is back to illegal contributions. You morons on the left are too stupid to comprehend how moronic this all looks.
 
Jarod said:
Tump is hanging his Jr. out to dry, he admitted his son is guilty of illegal collusion, and in the same Tweet denies he himself was a part of it.

Classic
Click to expand...

You're bloviating like a moron without a clue of what it is your are bloviating about; CLASSIC.

giphy.gif
 
Jarod said:
Tump is hanging his Jr. out to dry, he admitted his son is guilty of illegal collusion, and in the same Tweet denies he himself was a part of it.


Classic
Click to expand...

That’s misinformative, to put it diplomatically.

What did they collude on? Be specific. What were the details of the collusion? If they colluded, there was an objective and a plan to accomplish it.

Let’s hear it, finally.
 
Jarod said:
The meeting itself was a clear conspiracy to violate 11 USC 110.20(b) and 11 USC 110.20(g)
Click to expand...

No it wasn't; and attempting to suggest that it was proves what a shitty and dumb lawyer you actually are. That and the FACT that you are a whiny low information partisan hack on steroids.
 
Darth Omar said:
That’s misinformative, to put it diplomatically.

What did they collude on? Be specific. What were the details of the collusion? If they colluded, there was an objective and a plan to accomplish it.

Let’s hear it, finally.
Click to expand...

Collusion was accomplished by simply attending the meeting after the invitation promised damaging information on Hillary.

11 USC 110.20(b) and 11 USC 110.20(g)
 
Jarod said:
Collusion was accomplished by simply attending the meeting after the invitation promised damaging information on Hillary.
Click to expand...

:lolup:Moron doesn't know what collusion means. So of you meet someone, get nothing, pay nothing, you are guilty of what shit-for-brains? Gawd you're a fucking moron. :rofl2:
 
Truth Detector said:
Let's see how many times the losers on the left have changed the narrative; first it was collusion, then it was illegal contributions, then it was corruption, now it is back to illegal contributions. You morons on the left are too stupid to comprehend how moronic this all looks.
Click to expand...
:thumbsup:
 
Hit Man: (Calling a guy he knows wants his brother dead) Hey Billy, Its BobbyRey, I will kill your brother for you, come to my office tomorrow at 8:00AM, we can discuss.

BillyRay: If its what you say it is, I say hell ya.... Ill be there at 8:00AM.

FBI: (listening to the wire tap) Ok, if Billy shows up at 8:00AM arrest him for conspiracy to kill his brother.
 
Darth Omar said:
Omg lol.

Two parties that had their wires crossed met: one was led to believe it was for oppo dirt and the other wanted to talk about Russian adoption.

Result: meeting quickly adjourned with nothing at all accomplished. At. All. No collusion and no Russian adoption. Period. End of Story.

The most plausible explanation for it: The Russian lawyer knew Junior wouldn’t take a meeting to talk about Russian adoption in the midst of a busy campaign, so he was deceived into thinking he was going to get dirt on Hillary.

If that’s all Mullet has, you might as well stick a fork in it.
Click to expand...
taking a meeting is now a violation of Solicitation, acceptance, or receipt of contributions and donations from foreign nationals. except it's not , the following is CLEARLY about funding!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.20
1 CFR 110.20 - Prohibition on contributions, donations, expenditures, independent expenditures, and disbursements by foreign nationals
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top