Trump Sexual Assault Allegations!
- Thread starter zappasguitar
- Start date
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Liar
I took the vow.
Where is the Canadian? He said he'd talk about hypocrisy if I took the same vow.
Seems he's another reneger like Zappacrite.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Show the forum your proof that Russell Walker is a "Trumpkin", as you claimed on August 24th, Zappacrite.
I've lost count of the times times I've asked you for some proof and E-V-E-R-Y time you've dodged the question!
We all know what that means!
Oops...you got NOTHING!
As I've explained.
You won't answer my questions so I won't answer yours.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
So you demanded that Ralph provide evidence but refuse to do so yourself?
Dance, Zappacrite, dance.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
I don't recall saying that, skank.
Go and get the quotes of mine that prove what you say.
Go and get these alleged statements skank.
Get them all. Every single one.
Get the statements they all supposedly made under oath that he didn't rape them.
Post the proof, skank.
Trump was never accused of what Democrat and big time Democrat donor Harvey the pervert did you lying hypocritical asshole. What is it with the liberal left and their propensity to just lie about everything?
Which ones?
One could argue that most of Weinstein's trysts were consensual then. Yet Clinton denied it anyway.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Zappacrite cannot name a single "crime" that Trump has been accused of, can he?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
He wouldn't be a sociopathic lying Zappacrite if he could right?
Liberals think that saying you could grab pussies and women would let you do it is "assault" and is the same as Weinstein supposedly did.
Yes, they are that pathetically stupid and repugnant.
Cancel 2018.1
New member
I don't know. I never raped a woman. I was technically raped by an older woman when I was 17, although I wouldn't call it rape.
Indeed it means you have ignored the links from the NY TIMES and other sources in order to pretend that you don't have to introduce the objective evidence that overrules the prima facie evidence of record. Its the same ole story from a leftist. As pointed out previously, simply because you refuse to accept the prima facie evidence does not indicate that it can be overcome by your personal biased opinion. Again END OF STORY.....unless you present the objective evidence that presents the prima facie evidence of this person's history as an impossibility of logical truth..i.e., A FACTUAL REASON TO DOUBT that history is truthful. And brother.....your personal opinion does not qualify as a fact.
How many posts have you presented demanding that those being accused by you.....prove that your opinion is correct? Laughable in the fact of your ignorance. Saul Alinsky is overcome by the simple truth. Repeating accusations ad nauseam does not make them any more truthful whether its the 2nd accusation or the 100th.
You are using the Alinsky Formula for Radicals. 1. Accuse 2. Attack based upon an undocumented subjective accusation as if it was truth being presented 3. (the stage you are now engaging) DEFLECTION away from having to prove those accusations as truth (the supposed double standard where Trump attackers have no evidence v. the historical evidence of someone engaging in such a perversion with at least 8 historical paid out settlements...there is no comparison and no double standard as to base your false premise).
your next step in the Alinsky formula...rules for radicals number 4. the personal ad hominem attack attempting to make your opponent angry and go off on some tangent. The last? Number 5. Run like hell away from the facts....or a circular repeat with No. 1 starting all over again. But I am sure there is at least one more attempt by you....as you received the proverbial pat on the back.....ACCOLADE...from one of your cohorts...that you were phising for.....please continue, ask us one more time to present evidence.
The problem you are having in presenting objective evidences? None exists or Trump would not be president. Another problem? The truth is not subject to refutation..thus your attempts at deflection....being laughed at expect by others that are more ignorant than you.
Last edited:
I'd call it getting lucky.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
So you demanded that Ralph provide evidence but refuse to do so yourself?
Dance, Zappacrite, dance.
Just like you demand I produce evidence yet refuse to provide any when I request it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Different levels of assault one. 2 Trump's accusers had little evidence, and waited until October of his election year to mention it. Trump had fewer accusers and didn't accuse him of any serious crime, like rape.
So once again a libtard is comparing apples to oranges and trying to make that apple stick.
So once again a libtard is comparing apples to oranges and trying to make that apple stick.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
ROFL!!
It's always so much fun watching GBA dance along the top of that fence, terrified of coming down on either side cuz then he'd have to take an actual position.
Either he believes the women who accused Trump of sexual assault...in which case he's deliberately covering for a serial sexual predator.
OR...
He believes Trump over the women who accuse him...in which case he's just another hypocrite who only believes women when they are accusing someone of sexual assault that he doesn't support .
Lets see if he's FINALLY ready to choose a side.