evince
Truthmatters
It’s a Russian bot hole
Putin doesn’t hire the brightest Russians
They snuck out of the nation
White climate Nazis deface STONE HENGE - I will never support these self righteous authoritarian White Libs, They are pure EVIL
- Thread starter Bigdog
- Start date
Putin doesn’t hire the brightest Russians
They snuck out of the nation
ZenMode
Well-known member
The believed impact of CO2 on climate goes back way more than 2 decades. It goes back to the 1800's.
History of the greenhouse effect and global warming
History of the greenhouse effect and global warming
You are an uninformed fool.
List of Socialists in Congress:
List of socialist members of the United States Congress - Wikipedia
ZenMode
Well-known member
If one wants to use words correctly then it might be helpful to know what they mean.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Democratic socialism isn't the same as socialism. Democratic socialism(Bernie Sanders) really just means heavier wealth redistribution but the means of production are still privately owned and operated.You are an uninformed fool.
List of Socialists in Congress:
List of socialist members of the United States Congress - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
True socialism means the government own the means of production/businesses, which is why socialism is a recipe for failure - the government sucks at most everything it does.
No, Socialism is the control of goods and services. Communism is the ownership of goods and services.
So, a wet duck isn’t a duck. Too funny.
I posted the list of Socialists in Congress. You were wrong.
There are differences between socialism and communism, however. In fact, communism can be thought of as a strict and all-encompassing version of socialism. Under communism, all property is communally owned; private property doesn't exist. Under socialism, individuals can still own private property
A simple Google search but I learned about these two cancers, Socialism and Communism, in college,
A simple Google search but I learned about these two cancers, Socialism and Communism, in college,
ZenMode
Well-known member
You may be right about the government ownership being communism and public ownership being socialism. Either way, The people you listed are a part of a Democratic Socialist group, like Bernie Sanders. Democratic socialism just means heavier wealth redistribution, often through taxation. It is very, very different than socialism.
So, you admit that you were wrong, Socialism does not involve the ownership of goods and services.
So, a Socialist Democrat isn’t a Socialist. It’s a Democrat who is a Socialist.
A wet duck isn’t a duck, it’s just a duck that is wet. Too funny. A dead duck isn’t a duck, it’s just a duck that is dead.
You should quit while you are behind.
ZenMode
Well-known member
It involves the public ownership of business, not private or government owned, so yes I was wrong.
I've had no reason to refresh my memory on the differences between communism and socialism. Why would I or anyone?
Democratic Socialism keep ownership private, not government or public/workers, meaning that Democratic Socialism keeps capitalism in place. Socialism, in its true form, doesn't allow for capitalism.
ZenMode:
“True socialism means the government own the means of production/businesses, which is why socialism is a recipe for failure - the government sucks at most everything it does.”
This is a lie.
Troll elsewhere.
ZenMode
Well-known member
You really should work on recognizing the difference between lying and simply being wrong about something.... especially since I admitted I was wrong.
What I was wrong about didn't change what I was saying. It seems very unlikely that I would lie about something that doesn't hurt my argument.
The question is whether or not you can admit you thought Democratic socialism and socialism are the same thing and were wrong.
Except it is called "high level waste" by the NRC (HERE). The products include not only the original U but Cs-137 (which produces gammas) and Sr-90.
So it's not entirely alphas and betas.
You are downplaying a very serious issue.
I have heard that proposed. It has never actually been done and probably has quite a few additional issues other than your flippant proposal would suggest.
Can't solve problems by kicking the can down the road. That's how we got to where we are with storage facilities onsite at nuke plants now nearing capacity.
Yes, you were wrong to lie, now move along. I’ve wasted enough time tutoring you…free of charge.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
You're the expert on that being a dumb redneck, so you go ahead and explain it...
ZenMode
Well-known member
You tutored me on the difference between two things you thought were the same?
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
It gives off some gamma as each fragment decays, but the decay rate is so low that it isn't like deadly dangerous. It is simply sufficient that some precautions related to exposure and exposure time have to be taken to meet allowed levels of exposure.
I am being realistic about the issue. You are the one that is hyperbolic over it.
As for oceanic burial...
The Sub-Seabed Solution
Far from being embraced, a promising solution to the radioactive-waste problem faces stiff opposition from the federal government, the nuclear industry, and environmental interests
www.theatlantic.com
And a real case of the US back in the 50's sinking a ship full of radioactive waste off California
Radioactive WWII Aircraft Carrier Found Off The California Coast
The USS Independence — a World War II-era aircraft carrier — has been found in 2,600 feet of water off the coast of California's Farallon Islands. Surprisingly intact after 64 years, it was exposed to atomic blasts during the Bikini Atoll tests until it was deliberately sunk in 1951.
gizmodo.com
Sunken aircraft carrier rediscovered off California coast
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Scientists have rediscovered a mostly intact World War II aircraft carrier used in atomic bomb tests and then sunk at a secret location off the Northern California coast decades ago. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration located and recorded video of the U.S.S...
www.apnews.com
As for storage...
Nuclear Waste Is Piling Up. Does the U.S. Have a Plan?
We needs a permanent national nuclear waste disposal site now, before the spent nuclear fuel stored in 35 states becomes unsafe
All of the nuclear waste in the US today would fit inside a super Walmart (sans containers etc.). The problem is manageable, but fear mongering and ignorance are keeping anything permanent from happening.
So you're admitting that your comment about climate change being based on bullshit science was itself bullshit, because you have no idea whatsoever about the science behind it, so you choose instead to just parrot whatever the rest of the clueless rednecks of the right are regurgitating.
Got it.
I'm hardly hyperbolic. Please. I merely noted a longstanding and quite generally accepted issue with nuclear power. As I noted earlier I am in agreement with you that nuclear is probably the best, most scalable system to move us off of fossil fuels for electricity generation.