Why don't you Libtard/ Progressives/ Democrats just say it?

Southern Man said:
Since adoption records are secret, this ain't going to happen. And if the queers as as great parents as you say, they should be able to handle this easily. :)
Click to expand...

The only piece of info they will need is that the state only allows homosexuals to adopt the unwanted kids. They won't need to see any adoption records. They know who their adopted parents are.
 
Last edited:
Southern Man said:
If you're going to play that game, also not in the adoption papers, the queers collect child porn.
Click to expand...

Ok, take out both of the "not in the adoption papers", which couple do you think should be able to adopt?

Answer honestly.
 
RStringfield said:
The only piece of info they will need is that the state only allows homosexuals to adopt the unwanted kids. They want need to see any adoption records. They know who their adopted parents are.
Click to expand...
You queer enablers are making a mountain out of a mole hill. These are obscure policies of some adoption agency that the kid will never have contact with. Maybe by the time he's in college he'd get curious and do some research. And again, if the queer parents are as wonderful as you say they are, he won't care what some obscure policy says.
 
Southern Man said:
The Christian couple, obviously.
Click to expand...

So their religious belief is basically the only factor you needed anyway.

In other words, if you had to choose between the following:

A nice christian couple who have no college education, the husband works in construction as a bricklayer, and the mom works at a convenience store. They gross just under $60k a year, if he gets to work 12 months. It isn't in the adoption papers, but she has been seen with suspicious bruises on a few occasions. They are buying their home, but have gotten behind a few times on the mortgage. She has medical insurance thru her work.


A nice wiccan couple who both have college educations. He works for a Fortune 500 company in the accounting dept, and she is a freelance writer who works from home, which will guarantees someone is available for taking care of a sick child. They gross over $200k a year. They are active in their faith, volunteer in the community, and own their home. They want their child to go to private school to get the best possible education and can afford to send them there. The one who works for the Fortune 500 company has an excellent benefits package which includes medical, dental, and optical.




You would choose the christian couple?
 
Wow I can see you're playing the game again, so the queer couple once again collects child porn. What the fuck is your problem. :pke:
 
Southern Man said:
Wow I can see you're playing the game again, so the queer couple once again collects child porn. What the fuck is your problem. :pke:
Click to expand...

Try actually reading the question. I am glad you want to add the child porn to the mix, but since there was no queer couple, you are just trying to avoid answering the question.

I am not playing any game at all. I am simply asking questions and trying to clarify your position.

I simply made a change in the choices to make it a christian couple and a wiccan couple.
 
If you had to choose between the following:

A nice christian couple who have no college education, the husband works in construction as a bricklayer, and the mom works at a convenience store. They gross just under $60k a year, if he gets to work 12 months. It isn't in the adoption papers, but she has been seen with suspicious bruises on a few occasions. They are buying their home, but have gotten behind a few times on the mortgage. She has medical insurance thru her work.


A nice wiccan couple who both have college educations. He works for a Fortune 500 company in the accounting dept, and she is a freelance writer who works from home, which will guarantees someone is available for taking care of a sick child. They gross over $200k a year. They are active in their faith, volunteer in the community, and own their home. They want their child to go to private school to get the best possible education and can afford to send them there. The one who works for the Fortune 500 company has an excellent benefits package which includes medical, dental, and optical.



Which would you choose to allow to adopt?
 
WinterBorn said:
Try actually reading the question. I am glad you want to add the child porn to the mix, but since there was no queer couple, you are just trying to avoid answering the question.

I am not playing any game at all. I am simply asking questions and trying to clarify your position.

I simply made a change in the choices to make it a christian couple and a wiccan couple.
Click to expand...
Since you're continuing to pay the game "its not in the adoption papers but" then so am I. The wiccans are also queers and child pornographers. :pke:
 
Southern Man said:
Since you're continuing to pay the game "its not in the adoption papers but" then so am I. The wiccans are also queers and child pornographers. :pke:
Click to expand...

My mistake, I thought I had copied the other description.



If you had to choose between the following:

A nice christian couple who have no college education, the husband works in construction as a bricklayer, and the mom works at a convenience store. They gross just under $60k a year, if he gets to work 12 months. They are buying their home, but have gotten behind a few times on the mortgage. She has medical insurance thru her work.


A nice wiccan couple who both have college educations. He works for a Fortune 500 company in the accounting dept, and she is a freelance writer who works from home, which will guarantees someone is available for taking care of a sick child. They gross over $200k a year. They are active in their faith, volunteer in the community, and own their home. They want their child to go to private school to get the best possible education and can afford to send them there. The one who works for the Fortune 500 company has an excellent benefits package which includes medical, dental, and optical.



Which would you choose to allow to adopt?
 
Southern Man said:
You queer enablers are making a mountain out of a mole hill. These are obscure policies of some adoption agency that the kid will never have contact with. Maybe by the time he's in college he'd get curious and do some research. And again, if the queer parents are as wonderful as you say they are, he won't care what some obscure policy says.
Click to expand...

How is it obscure? If you are not arguing that this "back of the line" stuff should be a standard policy for adoption, then what are you arguing? If it is a standard policy then it is easy to find out and many people will know of it.

No one is arguing that homosexuals make better parents. There is no reason to believe sexuality has anything to do with one's ability to be a parent.
 
WinterBorn said:
My mistake, I thought I had copied the other description.



If you had to choose between the following:

A nice christian couple who have no college education, the husband works in construction as a bricklayer, and the mom works at a convenience store. They gross just under $60k a year, if he gets to work 12 months. They are buying their home, but have gotten behind a few times on the mortgage. She has medical insurance thru her work.


A nice wiccan couple who both have college educations. He works for a Fortune 500 company in the accounting dept, and she is a freelance writer who works from home, which will guarantees someone is available for taking care of a sick child. They gross over $200k a year. They are active in their faith, volunteer in the community, and own their home. They want their child to go to private school to get the best possible education and can afford to send them there. The one who works for the Fortune 500 company has an excellent benefits package which includes medical, dental, and optical.



Which would you choose to allow to adopt?
Click to expand...

Wow you admit your mistake. I'm impressed that you're learning. :D

If I had a choice, which I don't, I'd choose the Christian couple for my kid. Money does not bring happiness. Being Catholic, I'd rely on the Church's decision since they have a huge adoption agency and places more kids then any other private concern. If it was a government agency and they couldn't consider religion then they'd obviously choose the wealthier couple.
 
RStringfield said:
How is it obscure? If you are not arguing that this "back of the line" stuff should be a standard policy for adoption, then what are you arguing? If it is a standard policy then it is easy to find out and many people will know of it.

No one is arguing that homosexuals make better parents. There is no reason to believe sexuality has anything to do with one's ability to be a parent.
Click to expand...

Again, I refer to my last post on this issue.

Since sexuality is an important component in the human experience (as you so demonstrate by your tenacity at arguing for queers) your argument does not hold water.
 
Southern Man said:
Again, I refer to my last post on this issue.

Since sexuality is an important component in the human experience (as you so demonstrate by your tenacity at arguing for queers) your argument does not hold water.
Click to expand...

Our arguments are that sexual orientation is not an important part of parenting. We are not arguing that gays make better parents. We are arguing that the fixation on sexuality is misplaced when determining who makes a good parent and who can be allowed to marry.
 
Last edited:
WinterBorn said:
Our arguments are that sexual orientation is not an important part of parenting. We are not arguing that gays make better parents. We are arguing that the fixation of sexuality is misplaced when determining who makes a good parent and who can be allowed to marry.
Click to expand...

Do you have a job, or are you retired?

I think the flaw is you have way too much time on your hands and an obsession with being right.
 
Southern Man said:
Why don't you let RS speak for himself? Who made you his spokesman?
Click to expand...

LMAO! Oh, so now you want to restrict who answers what questions or who posts on a given thread?

I post on the threads as I choose. You can deal with it or whine to the mods.
 
Southern Man said:
Along with many other posters, I'll just continue to selectively ignore you as usual. :)
Click to expand...

That makes it easier when you have no answer for the points I make, and you know you will lose the debate.

I understand completely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top